• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较机器学习模型在预测 ICU 中非计划性拔管患者死亡率的应用。

Comparison of machine learning models for the prediction of mortality of patients with unplanned extubation in intensive care units.

机构信息

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.

Department of Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Science, Poznan, Poland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 20;8(1):17116. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35582-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-35582-2
PMID:30459331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6244193/
Abstract

Unplanned extubation (UE) can be associated with fatal outcome; however, an accurate model for predicting the mortality of UE patients in intensive care units (ICU) is lacking. Therefore, we aim to compare the performances of various machine learning models and conventional parameters to predict the mortality of UE patients in the ICU. A total of 341 patients with UE in ICUs of Chi-Mei Medical Center between December 2008 and July 2017 were enrolled and their demographic features, clinical manifestations, and outcomes were collected for analysis. Four machine learning models including artificial neural networks, logistic regression models, random forest models, and support vector machines were constructed and their predictive performances were compared with each other and conventional parameters. Of the 341 UE patients included in the study, the ICU mortality rate is 17.6%. The random forest model is determined to be the most suitable model for this dataset with F 0.860, precision 0.882, and recall 0.850 in the test set, and an area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.910 (SE: 0.022, 95% CI: 0.867-0.954). The area under ROC curves of the random forest model was significantly greater than that of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II (0.779, 95% CI: 0.716-0.841), Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS) (0.645, 95% CI: 0.564-0.726), and Glasgow Coma scales (0.577, 95%: CI 0.497-0.657). The results revealed that the random forest model was the best model to predict the mortality of UE patients in ICUs.

摘要

非计划性拔管(UE)可导致致命后果;然而,目前缺乏预测 ICU 中 UE 患者死亡率的准确模型。因此,我们旨在比较各种机器学习模型和常规参数在预测 ICU 中 UE 患者死亡率方面的性能。

共纳入 2008 年 12 月至 2017 年 7 月在奇美医疗中心 ICU 中发生 UE 的 341 例患者,收集其人口统计学特征、临床表现和结局进行分析。

构建了包括人工神经网络、逻辑回归模型、随机森林模型和支持向量机在内的 4 种机器学习模型,并比较了它们的预测性能。

在研究的 341 例 UE 患者中,ICU 死亡率为 17.6%。随机森林模型被确定为最适合该数据集的模型,在测试集中 F 值为 0.860、精度为 0.882、召回率为 0.850,接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为 0.910(SE:0.022,95%CI:0.867-0.954)。随机森林模型的 ROC 曲线下面积显著大于急性生理学和慢性健康评估(APACHE)II 评分(0.779,95%CI:0.716-0.841)、治疗干预评分系统(TISS)评分(0.645,95%CI:0.564-0.726)和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(0.577,95%CI:0.497-0.657)。

结果表明,随机森林模型是预测 ICU 中 UE 患者死亡率的最佳模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe54/6244193/35ffaa585ec1/41598_2018_35582_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe54/6244193/3e7d41869621/41598_2018_35582_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe54/6244193/35ffaa585ec1/41598_2018_35582_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe54/6244193/3e7d41869621/41598_2018_35582_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe54/6244193/35ffaa585ec1/41598_2018_35582_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of machine learning models for the prediction of mortality of patients with unplanned extubation in intensive care units.比较机器学习模型在预测 ICU 中非计划性拔管患者死亡率的应用。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 20;8(1):17116. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35582-2.
2
Development and Validation of Unplanned Extubation Prediction Models Using Intensive Care Unit Data: Retrospective, Comparative, Machine Learning Study.基于 ICU 数据的非计划性拔管预测模型的开发和验证:回顾性、对比、机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 11;23(8):e23508. doi: 10.2196/23508.
3
Risk Factors and Predictive Models for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Unplanned Extubation in Patients With Cancer: Prospective, Machine Learning Study.癌症患者外周置入中心静脉导管非计划性拔管的风险因素和预测模型:前瞻性、机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 16;25:e49016. doi: 10.2196/49016.
4
Prognostic factors and outcomes of unplanned extubation.计划性拔管的预后因素和结果。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 17;7(1):8636. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08867-1.
5
Early hospital mortality prediction of intensive care unit patients using an ensemble learning approach.基于集成学习方法的重症监护病房患者早期住院病死率预测。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Dec;108:185-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
6
Comparison of the APACHE III, APACHE II and Glasgow Coma Scale in acute head injury for prediction of mortality and functional outcome.急性颅脑损伤中APACHE III、APACHE II和格拉斯哥昏迷量表对死亡率及功能转归预测的比较
Intensive Care Med. 1997 Jan;23(1):77-84. doi: 10.1007/s001340050294.
7
Predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with acute kidney injury in the ICU using random forest model.应用随机森林模型预测 ICU 中急性肾损伤患者的院内死亡率。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 May;125:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
8
Revisiting Unplanned Endotracheal Extubation and Disease Severity in Intensive Care Units.重症监护病房中计划外气管插管与疾病严重程度的再探讨
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 20;10(10):e0139864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139864. eCollection 2015.
9
Machine learning-based mortality prediction model for heat-related illness.基于机器学习的与热相关疾病相关的死亡率预测模型。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 4;11(1):9501. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88581-1.
10
Comparison of APACHE III, II and the Glasgow Coma Scale for prediction of mortality in a neurosurgical intensive care unit.在神经外科重症监护病房中,比较急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅲ(APACHE III)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHE II)及格拉斯哥昏迷量表对死亡率的预测能力。
Clin Intensive Care. 1995;6(1):9-14.

引用本文的文献

1
Intensive Care Unit Patient Outcome Prediction Using ν-Support Vector Classification and Stochastic Signal Processing-Based Feature Extraction Techniques: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.使用ν支持向量分类和基于随机信号处理的特征提取技术预测重症监护病房患者的预后:算法开发与验证研究
JMIR AI. 2025 Aug 26;4:e72671. doi: 10.2196/72671.
2
Prediction model for unplanned extubation of thoracoabdominal drainage tube in postoperative inpatients: a retrospective study.术后住院患者胸腹引流管非计划拔管的预测模型:一项回顾性研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jun 9;30(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02748-4.
3
Risk Prediction of Unplanned Extubation in Inpatients Using Random Forest and Logistic Regression Models.

本文引用的文献

1
An Artificial Neural Network Model for Predicting Successful Extubation in Intensive Care Units.一种用于预测重症监护病房成功拔管的人工神经网络模型。
J Clin Med. 2018 Aug 25;7(9):240. doi: 10.3390/jcm7090240.
2
Prognostic factors and outcomes of unplanned extubation.计划性拔管的预后因素和结果。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 17;7(1):8636. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08867-1.
3
Multidisciplinary interventions and continuous quality improvement to reduce unplanned extubation in adult intensive care units: A 15-year experience.多学科干预及持续质量改进以降低成人重症监护病房非计划拔管率:15年经验总结
使用随机森林和逻辑回归模型对住院患者非计划拔管的风险预测
J Patient Saf. 2025 Sep 1;21(6):386-392. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001365. Epub 2025 May 27.
4
Enhancing machine learning performance in cardiac surgery ICU: Hyperparameter optimization with metaheuristic algorithm.提高心脏手术重症监护病房中的机器学习性能:使用元启发式算法进行超参数优化。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 10;20(2):e0311250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311250. eCollection 2025.
5
FIT calculator: a multi-risk prediction framework for medical outcomes using cardiorespiratory fitness data.FIT 计算器:一种基于心肺健康数据的医疗结果多风险预测框架。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 16;14(1):8745. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59401-z.
6
Impact of delay extubation on the reintubation rate in patients after cervical spine surgery: a retrospective cohort study.颈椎手术后患者延迟拔管对再插管率的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Aug 2;18(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04008-9.
7
Developing a machine-learning model for real-time prediction of successful extubation in mechanically ventilated patients using time-series ventilator-derived parameters.利用呼吸机衍生的时间序列参数,开发用于机械通气患者成功拔管实时预测的机器学习模型。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 9;10:1167445. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1167445. eCollection 2023.
8
Prediction of Prednisolone Dose Correction Using Machine Learning.使用机器学习预测泼尼松龙剂量校正
J Healthc Inform Res. 2023 Feb 15;7(1):84-103. doi: 10.1007/s41666-023-00128-3. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
An artificial intelligence system to predict the optimal timing for mechanical ventilation weaning for intensive care unit patients: A two-stage prediction approach.一种用于预测重症监护病房患者机械通气撤机最佳时机的人工智能系统:一种两阶段预测方法。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 18;9:935366. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.935366. eCollection 2022.
10
Predicting prediction: A systematic workflow to analyze factors affecting the classification performance in genomic biomarker discovery.预测预测:分析影响基因组生物标志物发现分类性能因素的系统工作流程。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 9;17(11):e0276607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276607. eCollection 2022.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jul;96(27):e6877. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006877.
4
Deep learning.深度学习。
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44. doi: 10.1038/nature14539.
5
Clinical outcomes after unplanned extubation in a surgical intensive care population.外科重症监护人群中计划性拔管后的临床结果。
World J Surg. 2014 Jan;38(1):203-10. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2249-5.
6
A Comparison of Intensive Care Unit Mortality Prediction Models through the Use of Data Mining Techniques.通过数据挖掘技术对重症监护病房死亡率预测模型的比较
Healthc Inform Res. 2011 Dec;17(4):232-43. doi: 10.4258/hir.2011.17.4.232. Epub 2011 Dec 31.
7
Risk factors and outcomes after unplanned extubations on the ICU: a case-control study.ICU 中非计划性拔管的风险因素和结局:一项病例对照研究。
Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R19. doi: 10.1186/cc9964. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
8
Clinical review: scoring systems in the critically ill.临床综述:危重症患者的评分系统。
Crit Care. 2010;14(2):207. doi: 10.1186/cc8204. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
9
Using random forest for reliable classification and cost-sensitive learning for medical diagnosis.使用随机森林进行可靠分类并采用成本敏感学习进行医学诊断。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Jan 30;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-S1-S22.
10
The drive to survive: unplanned extubation in the ICU.求生的本能:重症监护病房中的意外拔管
Chest. 2005 Aug;128(2):560-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.2.560.