Suppr超能文献

临终症状评估:家庭成员与医疗保健专业人员。

Symptom assessment in the dying: family members versus healthcare professionals.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

Department of Nursing, Campus Skellefteå, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Nov 20;14(4):428-433. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004382.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Symptom management and support of the family members (FMs) are considered essential aspects of palliative care. During end of life, patients are often not able to self-report symptoms. There is little knowledge in the literature of how healthcare professionals (HCPs) assess symptoms compared with FMs. The objective was to compare the assessment of symptoms and symptom relief during the final week of life between what was reported by FMs and what was reported by HCPs.

METHODS

Data from the Swedish Register of Palliative Care from 2021 and 2022 were used to compare congruity of the assessments by the FMs and by HCPs regarding occurrence and relief of three symptoms (pain, anxiety and confusion), using Cohen's kappa.

RESULTS

A total of 1131 patients were included. The agreement between FMs and HCPs was poor for occurrence of pain and confusion (kappa 0.25 and 0.16), but fair for occurrence of anxiety (kappa 0.30). When agreeing on a symptom being present, agreement on relief of that symptom was poor (kappa 0.04 for pain, 0.10 for anxiety and 0.01 for confusion). The trend was that HCPs more often rated occurrence of pain and anxiety, less often occurrence of confusion and more often complete symptom relief compared with the FMs.

CONCLUSIONS

The views of FMs and HCPs of the patients' symptoms differ in the end-of-life context, but both report important information and their symptom assessments should be considered both together and individually. More communication between HCPs and FMs could probably bridge some of these differences.

摘要

目的

症状管理和对家庭成员(家属)的支持被认为是姑息治疗的重要方面。在生命末期,患者通常无法自我报告症状。关于医护人员(医护人员)与家属相比如何评估症状,文献中知之甚少。目的是比较家属和医护人员在生命最后一周报告的症状和症状缓解情况。

方法

使用 2021 年和 2022 年瑞典姑息治疗登记处的数据,使用 Cohen's kappa 比较家属和医护人员对三种症状(疼痛、焦虑和混乱)发生和缓解的评估是否一致。

结果

共纳入 1131 例患者。家属和医护人员对疼痛和混乱发生的一致性较差(kappa 分别为 0.25 和 0.16),但对焦虑发生的一致性较好(kappa 为 0.30)。当就某一症状存在达成一致时,对该症状缓解的一致性较差(疼痛的 kappa 为 0.04,焦虑的 kappa 为 0.10,混乱的 kappa 为 0.01)。趋势是医护人员更常报告疼痛和焦虑的发生,较少报告混乱的发生,且更常报告完全缓解症状。

结论

在生命末期的背景下,家属和医护人员对患者症状的看法存在差异,但两者都报告了重要信息,他们的症状评估应同时考虑,并分别考虑。医护人员和家属之间更多的沟通可能会弥合其中的一些差异。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Dying from ALS in Sweden: clinical status, setting, and symptoms.瑞典肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者的临终情况:临床状态、环境及症状
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2023 May;24(3-4):237-245. doi: 10.1080/21678421.2022.2096411. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
10
Improved data validity in the Swedish Register of Palliative Care.瑞典姑息治疗登记处数据有效性的提高。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 19;12(10):e0186804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186804. eCollection 2017.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验