The Korea Cardiovascular Stent Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
The Cardiovascular Convergence Research Center of Chonnam National University Hospital Designated by Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare, Gwangju, Korea.
Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2024 Jan;21(1):53-64. doi: 10.1007/s13770-023-00608-y. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
Current polymer-based drug-eluting stents (DESs) have fundamental issues about inflammation and delayed re-endothelializaton of the vessel wall. Substance-P (SP), which plays an important role in inflammation and endothelial cells, has not yet been applied to coronary stents. Therefore, this study compares poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA)-based everolimus-eluting stents (PLGA-EESs) versus 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC)-based SP-eluting stents (MPC-SPs) in in-vitro and in-vivo models.
The morphology of the stent surface and peptide/drug release kinetics from stents were evaluated. The in-vitro proliferative effect of SP released from MPC-SP is evaluated using human umbilical vein endothelial cell. Finally, the safety and efficacy of the stent are evaluated after inserting it into a pig's coronary artery.
Similar to PLGA-EES, MPC-SP had a uniform surface morphology with very thin coating layer thickness (2.074 μm). MPC-SP showed sustained drug release of SP for over 2 weeks. Endothelial cell proliferation was significantly increased in groups treated with SP (n = 3) compared with the control (n = 3) and those with everolimus (n = 3) (SP: 118.9 ± 7.61% vs. everolimus: 64.3 ± 12.37% vs. the control: 100 ± 6.64%, p < 0.05). In the animal study, the percent stenosis was higher in MPC-SP group (n = 7) compared to PLGA-EES group (n = 7) (MPC-SP: 28.6 ± 10.7% vs. PLGA-EES: 16.7 ± 6.3%, p < 0.05). MPC-SP group showed, however, lower inflammation (MPC-SP: 0.3 ± 0.26 vs. PLGA-EES: 1.2 ± 0.48, p < 0.05) and fibrin deposition (MPC-SP: 1.0 ± 0.73 vs. PLGA-EES: 1.5 ± 0.59, p < 0.05) around the stent strut. MPC-SP showed more increased expression of cluster of differentiation 31, suggesting enhanced re-endothelialization.
Compared to PLGA-EES, MPC-SP demonstrated more decreased inflammation of the vascular wall and enhanced re-endothelialization and stent coverage. Hence, MPC-SP has the potential therapeutic benefits for the treatment of coronary artery disease by solving limitations of currently available DESs.
目前基于聚合物的药物洗脱支架(DES)在炎症和血管壁的延迟再内皮化方面存在根本问题。P 物质(SP)在炎症和内皮细胞中发挥重要作用,但尚未应用于冠状动脉支架。因此,本研究比较了聚乳酸-共-羟基乙酸(PLGA)载依维莫司洗脱支架(PLGA-EES)与 2-甲基丙烯酰氧乙基磷酸胆碱(MPC)载 P 物质洗脱支架(MPC-SP)在体外和体内模型中的作用。
评估支架表面形态和支架中肽/药物的释放动力学。采用人脐静脉内皮细胞评价 MPC-SP 释放的 SP 的体外增殖作用。最后,将支架插入猪冠状动脉后,评估支架的安全性和疗效。
与 PLGA-EES 类似,MPC-SP 具有均匀的表面形态和非常薄的涂层厚度(2.074 μm)。MPC-SP 显示 SP 的药物释放可持续超过 2 周。与对照组(n=3)和依维莫司组(n=3)相比,用 SP 处理的组(n=3)的内皮细胞增殖明显增加(SP:118.9±7.61% vs. 依维莫司:64.3±12.37% vs. 对照组:100±6.64%,p<0.05)。在动物研究中,与 PLGA-EES 组(n=7)相比,MPC-SP 组的狭窄率更高(MPC-SP:28.6±10.7% vs. PLGA-EES:16.7±6.3%,p<0.05)。然而,MPC-SP 组显示炎症程度较低(MPC-SP:0.3±0.26 vs. PLGA-EES:1.2±0.48,p<0.05)和支架支柱周围的纤维蛋白沉积较少(MPC-SP:1.0±0.73 vs. PLGA-EES:1.5±0.59,p<0.05)。MPC-SP 显示更多的 CD31 簇表达增加,提示再内皮化增强。
与 PLGA-EES 相比,MPC-SP 显示出血管壁炎症减轻、再内皮化和支架覆盖率增加。因此,MPC-SP 通过解决现有 DES 的局限性,具有治疗冠状动脉疾病的潜在治疗益处。