Lee So-Ryoung, Lee Ji Hyun, Choi Eue-Keun, Jung Eun-Kyung, You So-Jeong, Oh Seil, Lip Gregory Yh
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean Circ J. 2024 Jan;54(1):13-27. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2023.0084. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
Comprehensive epidemiological data are lacking on the incident atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). This study aimed to examine the incidence, risk factors, and AF-related adverse outcomes of patients with CIEDs.
This was an observational cohort study that analyzed patients without prevalent AF who underwent CIED implantation in 2009-2018 using a Korean nationwide claims database. The subjects were divided into three groups by CIED type and indication: pacemaker (n=21,438), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)/cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with heart failure (HF) (n=3,450), and ICD for secondary prevention without HF (n=2,146). The incidence of AF, AF-associated predictors, and adverse outcomes were evaluated.
During follow-up, the incidence of AF was 4.3, 7.3, and 5.1 per 100 person-years in the pacemaker, ICD/CRT with HF, and ICD without HF cohorts, respectively. Across the three cohorts, older age and valvular heart disease were commonly associated with incident AF. Incident AF was consistently associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke (3.8-11.4-fold), admission for HF (2.6-10.5-fold), hospitalization for any cause (2.4-2.7-fold), all-cause death (4.1-5.0-fold), and composite outcomes (3.4-5.7-fold). Oral anticoagulation rates were suboptimal in patients with incident AF (pacemaker, 51.3%; ICD/CRT with HF, 51.7%; and ICD without HF, 33.8%, respectively).
A substantial proportion of patients implanted CIED developed newly diagnosed AF. Incident AF was associated with a higher risk of adverse events. The importance of awareness, early detection, and appropriate management of AF in patients with CIED should be emphasized.
缺乏关于心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)患者新发心房颤动(AF)的全面流行病学数据。本研究旨在调查CIED患者的发病率、危险因素以及与AF相关的不良结局。
这是一项观察性队列研究,利用韩国全国性索赔数据库分析了2009年至2018年接受CIED植入且无既往AF的患者。根据CIED类型和适应证将受试者分为三组:起搏器(n = 21438)、植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)/伴有心力衰竭(HF)的心脏再同步治疗(CRT)(n = 3450)以及无HF的二级预防ICD(n = 2146)。评估AF的发病率、AF相关预测因素和不良结局。
在随访期间,起搏器组、伴有HF的ICD/CRT组和无HF的ICD组中AF的发病率分别为每100人年4.3、7.3和5.1例。在这三组中,年龄较大和患有心脏瓣膜病通常与新发AF相关。新发AF一直与缺血性卒中风险增加(3.8至11.4倍)、因HF入院(2.6至10.5倍)、因任何原因住院(2.4至2.7倍)、全因死亡(4.1至5.0倍)以及复合结局(3.4至5.7倍)相关。新发AF患者的口服抗凝率不理想(起搏器组为51.3%;伴有HF的ICD/CRT组为51.7%;无HF的ICD组为33.8%)。
相当一部分植入CIED的患者出现新诊断的AF。新发AF与更高的不良事件风险相关。应强调对CIED患者AF的认识、早期检测和适当管理的重要性。