Liang H, Si Y M, Lin S B, Shen J J, Guan W
Department of General Surgery, Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Nov 25;26(11):1051-1057. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230817-00056.
To compare the 1-year effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y duodenal bypass (SG+RYDJB) on weight loss, remission of diabetes, and postoperative complications in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes. A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2020 to December 2020. Sixty-four patients with type 2 diabetes and body mass index (BMI) of 27.5-40.0 kg/m were included in this study and divided into the RYGB group (=34) and the SG+RYDJB group (=30). In both procedures, the biliopancreatic branch was measured 100 cm distal to the Treitz ligament, and the food branch was measured 100 cm distal to the gastric or duodenojejunal anastomosis. Patients were followed up by telephone or WeChat, a free messaging and calling app at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively to determine their weight loss and remission of diabetes. The primary outcomes were the weight loss and reduction in blood glucose concentrations at 1 year after surgery and postoperative complications. Other postoperative changes, including body weight, BMI, percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and fasting blood glucose at 1 year after surgery were also assessed. There were no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups (all >0.05). No conversion to open surgery or death occurred in either group. Operation time was longer in the SG+RYDJB than the RYGB group (137.8±22.1 minutes vs. 80.0±24.9 minutes, =9.779, <0.001) and the incidence of perioperative complications was higher in the SG+RYDJB than the RYGB group (20% [6/30] vs. 2.9% [1/34], χ=4.761, =0.029). However, the postoperative hospital stay was similar between the two groups [3.0 (3.0, 4.3) days vs. 3.0 (4.0, 6.0) days, =641.500, =0.071]. Perioperative complications comprised small gastric pouch anastomotic leakage in one patient in the RYGB group and leakage (three patients) and bleeding (two patients with gastrointestinal bleeding and one with trocar site bleeding) in the SG+RYDJB group. Long-term complications were as follows. The incidence of anemia was significantly higher in the RYGB than the SG+RYDJB group (26.5% [9/34] vs. 3.3% [1/30], χ=6.472, =0.011). However, there were no significant differences in incidences of postoperative reflux, dumping syndrome, alopecia, diarrhea, constipation or foul-smelling flatus between the two groups (all >0.05). Compared with 1 year before surgery, the body weights and fasting plasma glucose concentrations of patients in the SG+RYDJB and RYGB group (72.4±10.6 kg vs. 98.5±14.2 kg, respectively; 68.2±10.0 kg vs. 91.9±14.8 kg, respectively), BMI (25.2±2.9 kg/m vs. 34.3±4.2 kg/m, respectively; 24.3±2.4 kg/m vs. 32.7±3.7 kg/m, respectively) (5.5±1.6 vs. 10.6±3.3, respectively; 5.8±2.1 vs. 9.0±3.4, respectively); HbA1c (5.7±0.8 vs. 9.7±1.2, respectively; 9.1±1.9 vs. 5.9±0.9, respectively) were significantly lower at 1 year after surgery (all <0.05). However, the % TWL (26.5%±6.0% vs. 25.6%±4.4%, =0.663, =0.510) and % EWL (109.1%±38.2% vs. 109.4%±40.3%, =-0.026, =0.026), rate of complete remission of diabetes at 1 year (80.0% [24/30] vs. 82.4% [28/34], χ=0.058, =0.810] did not differ significantly between the two groups (all >0.05). Although SG+RYDJB surgery compared with RYGB is more difficult to perform, it can achieve similar weight loss and remission of diabetes and is associated with a lower incidence of anemia because of the preservation of the pylorus.
比较Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)和袖状胃切除术联合Roux-en-Y十二指肠旁路术(SG+RYDJB)对肥胖合并2型糖尿病患者体重减轻、糖尿病缓解及术后并发症的1年影响。于2020年1月至2020年12月在南京医科大学第一附属医院开展一项单中心回顾性队列研究。本研究纳入64例2型糖尿病且体重指数(BMI)为27.5-40.0kg/m²的患者,分为RYGB组(n=34)和SG+RYDJB组(n=30)。在两种手术中,均于屈氏韧带远端100cm处测量胆胰支,于胃或十二指肠空肠吻合口远端100cm处测量食物支。术后1、3、6和12个月通过电话或微信(一款免费的即时通讯和通话应用程序)对患者进行随访,以确定其体重减轻情况和糖尿病缓解情况。主要结局指标为术后1年的体重减轻、血糖浓度降低及术后并发症。还评估了其他术后变化,包括术后1年的体重、BMI、总体重减轻百分比(%TWL)、超重减轻百分比(%EWL)、糖化血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)和空腹血糖。两组基线数据无显著差异(均P>0.05)。两组均未发生转为开放手术或死亡情况。SG+RYDJB组手术时间长于RYGB组(137.8±22.1分钟vs.80.0±24.9分钟,t=9.779,P<0.001),SG+RYDJB组围手术期并发症发生率高于RYGB组(20%[6/30]vs.2.9%[1/34],χ²=4.761,P=0.029)。然而,两组术后住院时间相似[3.0(3.0,4.3)天vs.3.0(4.0,6.0)天,Z=641.500,P=0.071]。围手术期并发症包括RYGB组1例患者小胃囊吻合口漏,SG+RYDJB组漏(3例)和出血(2例胃肠道出血和1例套管针穿刺部位出血)。长期并发症如下。RYGB组贫血发生率显著高于SG+RYDJB组(26.5%[9/34]vs.3.3%[1/30],χ²=6.472,P=0.011)。然而,两组术后反流、倾倒综合征、脱发、腹泻、便秘或排气恶臭发生率无显著差异(均P>0.05)。与术前1年相比,SG+RYDJB组和RYGB组患者术后1年的体重和空腹血糖浓度(分别为72.4±10.6kg vs.98.5±14.2kg;68.2±10.0kg vs.91.9±14.8kg)、BMI(分别为25.2±2.9kg/m² vs.34.3±4.2kg/m²;24.3±2.4kg/m² vs.32.7±3.7kg/m²)、%TWL(分别为5.5±1.6 vs.10.6±3.3;5.8±2.1 vs.9.0±3.4)、HbA1c(分别为5.7±0.8 vs.9.7±1.2;9.1±1.9 vs.5.9±0.9)均显著降低(均P<0.05)。然而,两组的%TWL(26.5%±6.0% vs.25.6%±4.4%,t=0.663,P=0.510)和%EWL(109.1%±38.2% vs.109.4%±40.3%,t=-0.026,P=0.026)、术后1年糖尿病完全缓解率(80.0%[24/30]vs.82.4%[28/34],χ²=0.058,P=0.810)差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。尽管与RYGB相比,SG+RYDJB手术操作难度更大,但它能实现相似的体重减轻和糖尿病缓解,且因保留幽门而贫血发生率较低。