• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆结石:CT评估

Cholelithiasis: evaluation with CT.

作者信息

Barakos J A, Ralls P W, Lapin S A, Johnson M B, Radin D R, Colletti P M, Boswell W D, Halls J M

出版信息

Radiology. 1987 Feb;162(2):415-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.162.2.3797654.

DOI:10.1148/radiology.162.2.3797654
PMID:3797654
Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is often the first imaging modality used in the diagnosis of patients with suspected abdominal disease. While it is known that early generation CT scanners often detect gallstones, the detection rate of newer equipment is not widely known. Abdominal CT scans of 226 patients who had undergone ultrasonographic (US) studies of the gallbladder were reviewed in a blinded study to determine the accuracy of state-of-the-art CT scanning equipment in the detection of cholelithiasis. Of 110 patients with US or surgical evidence of cholelithiasis, gallstones were demonstrated on CT images of 87 (79.1% sensitivity). Overall accuracy was 89.8%, while specificity was 100%. On CT images stones could appear densely (48.3%) or slightly (11.5%) calcified, as an area with a rim of increased density (21.8%), as an area of soft-tissue density (14.9%), or as an area of low density (3.4%). Stone size, stone density, section incrementation, and the pericholecystic anatomy affected the detection rate. Understanding the spectrum of findings and the other factors involved can optimize success of diagnosis of cholelithiasis on the basis of CT examinations.

摘要

计算机断层扫描(CT)通常是疑似腹部疾病患者诊断中首先使用的成像方式。虽然已知早期的CT扫描仪经常能检测到胆结石,但新型设备的检测率并不广为人知。在一项盲法研究中,对226例接受过胆囊超声(US)检查的患者的腹部CT扫描进行了回顾,以确定最先进的CT扫描设备检测胆结石的准确性。在110例有超声或手术证据证明患有胆结石的患者中,87例(敏感性为79.1%)的CT图像上显示有胆结石。总体准确率为89.8%,特异性为100%。在CT图像上,结石可表现为高密度(48.3%)或低密度(11.5%)钙化,表现为密度增加边缘的区域(21.8%),表现为软组织密度区域(14.9%),或表现为低密度区域(3.4%)。结石大小、结石密度、层厚增量和胆囊周围解剖结构会影响检测率。了解发现的范围和其他相关因素可以优化基于CT检查的胆结石诊断成功率。

相似文献

1
Cholelithiasis: evaluation with CT.胆结石:CT评估
Radiology. 1987 Feb;162(2):415-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.162.2.3797654.
2
False-positive CT diagnosis of gallstones due to thickening of the gallbladder wall.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Nov;149(5):941-4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.149.5.941.
3
Computed tomography of the gallbladder.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978 Jun;130(6):1059-67. doi: 10.2214/ajr.130.6.1059.
4
[Diagnostic imaging of cholelithiasis--CT & MRI].[胆结石的诊断成像——CT与MRI]
Nihon Rinsho. 1993 Jul;51(7):1773-8.
5
Role of oral cholecystography, real-time ultrasound, and CT in evaluation of gallstones and gallbladder function.
Gastrointest Radiol. 1992 Summer;17(3):257-61. doi: 10.1007/BF01888562.
6
CT evaluation of acute cholecystitis: findings and usefulness in diagnosis.急性胆囊炎的CT评估:诊断中的发现及应用价值
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 May;166(5):1085-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.166.5.8615248.
7
Computed tomography density of gallbladder stones may aid in predicting the rate of stone fragmentation with extracorporeal lithotripsy.
Radiat Med. 1990 Sep-Oct;8(5):179-83.
8
[Imaging procedures prior to the extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of gallstones].[胆结石体外冲击波碎石术前的影像学检查]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1991 Jan 25;116(4):128-33. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1063591.
9
The imaging evaluation of cholelithiasis in the obese patient-ultrasound vs CT cholecystography: our experience with the bariatric surgery population.肥胖患者胆石症的影像学评估——超声与CT胆囊造影:我们在肥胖症手术人群中的经验
Obes Surg. 2009 Feb;19(2):207-210. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9582-z. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
10
[Role of computerized tomography in the densitometric assessment of lithiasis of the gallbladder].
Radiol Med. 1992 Oct;84(4):387-92.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiological diagnosis of gallstone sigmoid ileus or coleus: Case report and literature review.胆结石致乙状结肠节段性肠梗阻或结肠壁缺血的放射学诊断:病例报告及文献综述
SA J Radiol. 2025 Aug 19;29(1):3149. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v29i1.3149. eCollection 2025.
2
Cholecystocolonic Fistula: A Case of Chronic Diarrhoea and Hidden Stones.胆囊结肠瘘:一例慢性腹泻与隐匿结石病例
Cureus. 2024 Nov 6;16(11):e73129. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73129. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Noncalcified Gallstone Ileus in Computed Tomography (CT) Abdomen and Pelvis With Contrast.
腹部和盆腔增强计算机断层扫描(CT)显示的非钙化性胆石性肠梗阻
Cureus. 2024 Sep 30;16(9):e70524. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70524. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Prevalence and risk factors for gallstone and renal stone formation in patients with intestinal Behçet's disease.肠白塞病患者胆囊结石和肾结石形成的患病率及危险因素。
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Sep;39(5):770-782. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2024.006. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
5
Accuracy of Ultrasound and Computed Tomography in Diagnosing Acute Cholecystitis Patients in a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯一家三级医疗中心中超声和计算机断层扫描在诊断急性胆囊炎患者中的准确性
Cureus. 2023 Sep 9;15(9):e44934. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44934. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Gallstones Detection on Dual-Energy Computerized Tomography-Is It Ready for Real-World Use? A Retrospective Observational Study.双能计算机断层扫描检测胆囊结石:是否已准备好应用于实际?一项回顾性观察研究。
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2024;48(1):35-41. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001535. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
7
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2021.2021 年胆石病循证临床实践指南。
J Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep;58(9):801-833. doi: 10.1007/s00535-023-02014-6. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
8
Focal incidental upper abdominal findings on unenhanced chest computed tomography that do not require further imaging: a roadmap for the thoracic radiologist.未增强胸部计算机断层扫描上的局灶性偶然上腹部发现,无需进一步影像学检查:胸科放射科医生的路线图。
Radiol Bras. 2022 May-Jun;55(3):173-180. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2021.0106.
9
Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) Findings of Complications of Acute Cholecystitis. A Pictorial Essay.多排螺旋 CT 对急性胆囊炎并发症的诊断价值(附病例分析)
Tomography. 2022 Apr 18;8(2):1159-1171. doi: 10.3390/tomography8020095.
10
Computed tomography findings of ceftriaxone-associated biliary pseudocholelithiasis in adults.成人头孢曲松相关胆道假性胆石症的计算机断层扫描表现。
Jpn J Radiol. 2019 Dec;37(12):826-831. doi: 10.1007/s11604-019-00893-5. Epub 2019 Oct 25.