• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

忠诚分歧与关系暧昧。

Divided loyalties and ambiguous relationships.

作者信息

Toulmin S

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 1986;23(8):783-7. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90276-5.

DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(86)90276-5
PMID:3798158
Abstract

The author argues that conflicts of obligation may, but need not, give rise to issues of divided loyalties. Given this, the question then becomes under what circumstances and conditions a simple internal conflict may escalate into the problem of divided loyalties or fiduciary ambiguities. After discussing conflicts of obligation, it is asserted that loyalties are divided only when the demands of the various relationships involved are irreconcilable. As this is an extreme, the major problematic issues fall, then, in between, on multiple loyalties and ambiguous loyalties. How and where multiple loyalties arise, and under what conditions they may become ambiguous loyalties lead to the recognition that moral problems are created by leaving in ambiguity things about the relationships involved that would be better sorted out. Finally the author looks at situations in which physicians are systematically exposed to irresoluble ambiguity.

摘要

作者认为,义务冲突可能,但不一定会引发忠诚分歧问题。鉴于此,问题就变成了在何种情况和条件下,简单的内部冲突可能升级为忠诚分歧问题或信托义务模糊问题。在讨论了义务冲突之后,有人断言,只有当所涉及的各种关系的要求无法协调时,忠诚才会出现分歧。由于这是一种极端情况,那么主要的问题就介于两者之间,即多重忠诚和模糊忠诚。多重忠诚如何以及在何处产生,以及在何种条件下它们可能变成模糊忠诚,这导致人们认识到,对所涉及关系中本应更好厘清的事情含糊其辞会引发道德问题。最后,作者审视了医生系统性地面临无法解决的模糊性的情况。

相似文献

1
Divided loyalties and ambiguous relationships.忠诚分歧与关系暧昧。
Soc Sci Med. 1986;23(8):783-7. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90276-5.
2
Divided loyalties for physicians: social context and moral problems.
Soc Sci Med. 1986;23(8):827-32. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90281-9.
3
Divided loyalties in medicine: the ambivalence of occupational medical practice.
Soc Sci Med. 1986;23(8):789-96. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90277-7.
4
'Role' as a moral concept in health care.“角色”作为医疗保健中的一个道德概念。
J Med Philos. 1982 Feb;7(1):57-63. doi: 10.1093/jmp/7.1.57.
5
Physicians and patients: moral agency in a pluralistic world.
J Med Humanit Bioeth. 1986 Spring-Summer;7(1):57-68. doi: 10.1007/BF01115177.
6
Ethical issues regarding mixed agency of military physicians.军事医生双重身份的伦理问题。
Soc Sci Med. 1986;23(8):803-15. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90279-0.
7
The internal morality of clinical medicine: a paradigm for the ethics of the helping and healing professions.临床医学的内在道德:帮助与治愈职业伦理的一种范式。
J Med Philos. 2001 Dec;26(6):559-79. doi: 10.1076/jmep.26.6.559.2998.
8
Establishing the moral basis of medicine: Edmund D. Pellegrino's philosophy of medicine.确立医学的道德基础:埃德蒙·D·佩莱格里诺的医学哲学
J Med Philos. 1990 Jun;15(3):245-67. doi: 10.1093/jmp/15.3.245.
9
Physical therapists as double agents. Ethical dilemmas of divided loyalties.物理治疗师作为双重角色。忠诚冲突带来的伦理困境。
Phys Ther. 1987 Mar;67(3):383-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.3.383.
10
Divided loyalties: a physician's responsibilities in an information age.忠诚分歧:信息时代医生的责任
Soc Sci Med. 1986;23(8):817-26. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90280-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The regulation of clinical research: What's love got to do with it?临床研究的监管:这与爱有何关系?
Learn Health Syst. 2017 Dec 5;2(1):e10048. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10048. eCollection 2018 Jan.
2
Fairer sex: the ethics of determining gender for athletic eligibility: commentary on "Beyond the Caster Semenya controversy: the case of the use of genetics for gender testing in sport".女性:确定运动员参赛资格性别的伦理问题:评《超越卡斯特·塞门亚争议:体育中利用遗传学进行性别检测的案例》
J Genet Couns. 2010 Dec;19(6):549-50. doi: 10.1007/s10897-010-9322-0. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
3
Balancing rationalities: gatekeeping in health care.
平衡合理性:医疗保健中的把关
J Med Ethics. 2001 Feb;27(1):25-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.1.25.
4
Physician perspectives on the ethical aspects of disability determination.医生对残疾判定伦理问题的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Sep;11(9):525-32. doi: 10.1007/BF02599599.