Suppr超能文献

穿透性颈部损伤:选择性探查的经验

Penetrating neck injuries: experience with selective exploration.

作者信息

Cohen E S, Breaux C W, Johnson P N, Leitner C A

出版信息

South Med J. 1987 Jan;80(1):26-8. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198701000-00006.

Abstract

Although many authors have stated that surgical exploration should be mandatory for all neck wounds that penetrate the platysma, recent reports from many centers now claim that selective exploration is both safe and reasonable. A policy of selective exploration based on clinical presentation, anatomic location, and results of diagnostic studies has been followed at The Cooper Green Hospital in Birmingham, Alabama, for the past 13 years. We report a study of penetrating neck wounds in 136 consecutive patients admitted to The Cooper Green Hospital from 1972 to 1984. Seventy-seven patients (57%) had exploration immediately, with one death, while the remaining 59 (43%) were admitted and observed. Of these 59 patients, ten had arch aortography and nine had esophagography, all of which yielded normal results. The remainder of the patients observed had no clinical signs or symptoms to suggest a major injury. There were no deaths or complications related to the neck wounds in the 59 patients observed. Results of 27 explorations (35%) were negative. We conclude that selective exploration of penetrating neck wounds is both safe and reasonable.

摘要

尽管许多作者指出,对于所有穿透颈阔肌的颈部伤口都应进行手术探查,但现在许多中心的最新报告称,选择性探查既安全又合理。在过去13年里,阿拉巴马州伯明翰市的库珀·格林医院一直遵循基于临床表现、解剖位置和诊断研究结果的选择性探查策略。我们报告了一项对1972年至1984年连续入住库珀·格林医院的136例穿透性颈部伤口患者的研究。77例患者(57%)立即接受了探查,其中1例死亡,其余59例(43%)入院观察。在这59例患者中,10例行主动脉弓造影,9例行食管造影,所有结果均正常。其余观察的患者没有提示严重损伤的临床体征或症状。在观察的59例患者中,没有因颈部伤口导致的死亡或并发症。27例(35%)探查结果为阴性。我们得出结论,穿透性颈部伤口的选择性探查既安全又合理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验