Wang Xinjuan, Tu Meng, Jia Hongxia, Liu Hongping, Wang Yan, Wang Yibo, Jiang Nan, Lu Chunya, Zhang Guojun
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China.
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2023 Sep 20;26(9):659-668. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2023.101.26.
The SMARCA4 mutation has been shown to account for at least 10% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the present, conventional radiotherapy and targeted therapy are difficult to improve outcomes due to the highly aggressive and refractory nature of SMARCA4-deficient NSCLC (SMARCA4-DNSCLC) and the absence of sensitive site mutations for targeted drug therapy, and chemotherapy combined with or without immunotherapy is the main treatment. Effective SMARCA4-DNSCLC therapeutic options, however, are still debatable. Our study aimed to investigate the efficacy and prognosis of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with chemotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with stage III-IV SMARCA4-DNSCLC.
46 patients with stage III-IV SMARCA4-DNSCLC were divided into two groups based on their treatment regimen: the chemotherapy group and the PD-1 ICIs plus chemotherapy group, and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Efficacy assessment and survival analysis were performed in both groups, and the influencing factors for prognosis were explored for patients with SMARCA4-DNSCLC.
Male smokers are more likely to develop SMARCA4-DNSCLC. There was no significant difference in the objective response rate (76.5% vs 69.0%, P=0.836) between chemotherapy and the PD-1 ICIs plus chemotherapy or the disease control rate (100.0% vs 89.7%, P=0.286). The one-year overall survival rate in the group with PD-1 ICIs plus chemotherapy was 62.7%, and that of the chemotherapy group was 46.0%. The difference in median progression-free survival (PFS) between the PD-1 ICIs plus chemotherapy group and the chemotherapy group was statistically significant (9.3 mon vs 6.1 mon, P=0.048). The results of Cox regression analysis showed that treatment regimen and smoking history were independent influencing factors of PFS in patients with stage III-IV SMARCA4-DNSCLC, and family history was an individual influencing factor of overall survival in patients with stage III-IV SMARCA4-DNSCLC.
Treatment regimen may be a prognostic factor for patients with SMARCA4-DNSCLC, and patients with PD-1 ICIs plus chemotherapy may have a better prognosis.
SMARCA4突变已被证实至少占非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的10%。目前,由于SMARCA4缺陷型NSCLC(SMARCA4-DNSCLC)具有高度侵袭性和难治性,且缺乏靶向药物治疗的敏感位点突变,传统放疗和靶向治疗难以改善预后,化疗联合或不联合免疫治疗是主要治疗方法。然而,有效的SMARCA4-DNSCLC治疗方案仍存在争议。我们的研究旨在探讨程序性细胞死亡1(PD-1)免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)联合化疗与单纯化疗在III-IV期SMARCA4-DNSCLC患者中的疗效和预后。
46例III-IV期SMARCA4-DNSCLC患者根据治疗方案分为两组:化疗组和PD-1 ICI联合化疗组,并对其临床资料进行回顾性分析。对两组进行疗效评估和生存分析,并探讨SMARCA4-DNSCLC患者预后的影响因素。
男性吸烟者更易发生SMARCA4-DNSCLC。化疗与PD-1 ICI联合化疗的客观缓解率(76.5%对69.0%,P=0.836)或疾病控制率(100.0%对89.7%,P=0.286)无显著差异。PD-1 ICI联合化疗组的1年总生存率为62.7%,化疗组为46.0%。PD-1 ICI联合化疗组与化疗组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)差异有统计学意义(9.3个月对6.1个月,P=0.048)。Cox回归分析结果显示,治疗方案和吸烟史是III-IV期SMARCA4-DNSCLC患者PFS的独立影响因素,家族史是III-IV期SMARCA4-DNSCLC患者总生存的个体影响因素。
治疗方案可能是SMARCA4-DNSCLC患者的预后因素,PD-1 ICI联合化疗的患者可能预后更好。