• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

噪音不平等会影响城市野生动物。

Inequalities in noise will affect urban wildlife.

机构信息

Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Ecology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA.

出版信息

Nat Ecol Evol. 2024 Jan;8(1):163-174. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02257-9. Epub 2023 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1038/s41559-023-02257-9
PMID:37985897
Abstract

Understanding how systemic biases influence local ecological communities is essential for developing just and equitable environmental practices that prioritize both human and wildlife well-being. With over 270 million residents inhabiting urban areas in the United States, the socioecological consequences of racially targeted zoning, such as redlining, need to be considered in urban planning. There is a growing body of literature documenting the relationships between redlining and the inequitable distribution of environmental harms and goods, green space cover and pollutant exposure. However, it remains unknown whether historical redlining affects the distribution of urban noise or whether inequitable noise drives an ecological change in urban environments. Here we conducted a spatial analysis of how urban noise corresponds to the distribution of redlining categories and a systematic literature review to summarize the effects of noise on wildlife in urban landscapes. We found strong evidence to indicate that noise is inequitably distributed in redlined urban communities across the United States, and that inequitable noise may drive complex biological responses across diverse urban wildlife, reinforcing the interrelatedness of socioecological outcomes. These findings lay a foundation for future research that advances relationships between acoustic and urban ecology through centring equity and challenging systems of oppression in wildlife studies.

摘要

了解系统性偏见如何影响当地生态群落,对于制定公正和公平的环境实践至关重要,这些实践既要优先考虑人类福祉,也要重视野生动物的福祉。美国有超过 2.7 亿居民居住在城市地区,因此需要在城市规划中考虑到种族针对性分区(如红线政策)带来的社会生态后果。越来越多的文献记录了红线政策与环境危害和资源分配不均、绿地覆盖和污染物暴露之间的关系。然而,目前尚不清楚历史上的红线政策是否会影响城市噪声的分布,或者不公平的噪声是否会导致城市环境中的生态变化。在这里,我们进行了一项空间分析,以了解城市噪声与红线政策分类的分布之间的关系,并进行了系统的文献综述,以总结噪声对城市景观中野生动物的影响。我们有强有力的证据表明,在美国的红线政策城市社区中,噪声分布不均,不公平的噪声可能会导致各种城市野生动物产生复杂的生物反应,从而强化了社会生态结果的相互关联性。这些发现为未来的研究奠定了基础,这些研究通过关注公平性和挑战野生动物研究中的压迫制度,推进了声学与城市生态学之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Inequalities in noise will affect urban wildlife.噪音不平等会影响城市野生动物。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2024 Jan;8(1):163-174. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02257-9. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
2
A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife.二十年来有关噪声对野生动物影响的研究综述。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016 Nov;91(4):982-1005. doi: 10.1111/brv.12207. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
3
Historical redlining is associated with disparities in wildlife biodiversity in four California cities.历史上的红线划定与加利福尼亚州四个城市的野生动物生物多样性差异有关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 18;121(25):e2321441121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2321441121. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
4
Modeling the Relationships Between Historical Redlining, Urban Heat, and Heat-Related Emergency Department Visits: An Examination of 11 Texas Cities.模拟历史上的红线划分、城市热岛效应与与热相关的急诊科就诊之间的关系:对德克萨斯州11个城市的考察。
Environ Plan B Urban Anal City Sci. 2022 Mar;49(3):933-952. doi: 10.1177/23998083211039854. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
5
The ecological and evolutionary consequences of systemic racism in urban environments.城市环境中系统性种族主义的生态和进化后果。
Science. 2020 Sep 18;369(6510). doi: 10.1126/science.aay4497. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
6
Historical redlining is associated with increasing geographical disparities in bird biodiversity sampling in the United States.历史上的红线划定与美国鸟类生物多样性采样的地理差异不断扩大有关。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Nov;7(11):1869-1877. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01688-5. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
7
Systemic racism alters wildlife genetic diversity.系统性种族主义改变了野生动物的遗传多样性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 25;119(43):e2102860119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102860119. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
8
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
9
A review of the effects of aircraft noise on wildlife and humans, current control mechanisms, and the need for further study.飞机噪音对野生动物和人类的影响、当前的控制机制以及进一步研究的必要性综述。
Environ Manage. 2003 Oct;32(4):418-32. doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-3024-4.
10
Historical Redlining Is Associated with Disparities in Environmental Quality across California.历史上的红线划定与加利福尼亚州各地的环境质量差异有关。
Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2024 Jan 19;11(2):54-59. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00870. eCollection 2024 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Restoring landscapes and communities: Insights from critical, urban, and plant ecology.恢复景观与社区:来自批判生态学、城市生态学和植物生态学的见解
Environ Sci Ecotechnol. 2025 Jul 12;27:100601. doi: 10.1016/j.ese.2025.100601. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Association of Historical Redlining With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: The Mediating Role of BMI and Area Deprivation Index.历史上的红线划定与妊娠期糖尿病的关联:BMI和地区贫困指数的中介作用
Diabetes Care. 2025 May 1;48(5):711-718. doi: 10.2337/dc24-2147.
3
Evaluation of noise pollution impact on health in Dhaka city, Bangladesh.

本文引用的文献

1
A global meta-analysis reveals contrasting impacts of air, light, and noise pollution on pollination.一项全球荟萃分析揭示了空气污染、光照污染和噪音污染对授粉的不同影响。
Ecol Evol. 2023 Apr 18;13(4):e9990. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9990. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Green gentrification in European and North American cities.欧洲和北美的绿色绅士化。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 2;13(1):3816. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31572-1.
3
Community daytime noise pollution and socioeconomic differences in Chicago, IL.伊利诺伊州芝加哥市社区日间噪声污染与社会经济差异
孟加拉国达卡市噪声污染对健康影响的评估。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 15;12:1477684. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1477684. eCollection 2024.
4
Historical redlining is associated with disparities in wildlife biodiversity in four California cities.历史上的红线划定与加利福尼亚州四个城市的野生动物生物多样性差异有关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 18;121(25):e2321441121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2321441121. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
5
Race, historical redlining, and contemporary transportation noise disparities in the United States.美国的种族、历史上的红线划定以及当代交通噪音差异
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;35(1):50-61. doi: 10.1038/s41370-024-00682-x. Epub 2024 May 17.
6
Historical Redlining Is Associated with Disparities in Environmental Quality across California.历史上的红线划定与加利福尼亚州各地的环境质量差异有关。
Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2024 Jan 19;11(2):54-59. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00870. eCollection 2024 Feb 13.
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 4;16(8):e0254762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254762. eCollection 2021.
4
A synthesis of health benefits of natural sounds and their distribution in national parks.自然声音的健康益处及其在国家公园中的分布综述。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 6;118(14). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013097118.
5
Redlines and Greenspace: The Relationship between Historical Redlining and 2010 Greenspace across the United States.红线与绿地:美国历史红线与 2010 年绿地之间的关系。
Environ Health Perspect. 2021 Jan;129(1):17006. doi: 10.1289/EHP7495. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
6
Sensory pollutants alter bird phenology and fitness across a continent.感官污染物会改变鸟类的物候和适应能力,这种影响跨越整个大陆。
Nature. 2020 Nov;587(7835):605-609. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2903-7. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
7
The ecological and evolutionary consequences of systemic racism in urban environments.城市环境中系统性种族主义的生态和进化后果。
Science. 2020 Sep 18;369(6510). doi: 10.1126/science.aay4497. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
8
The balancing act of urban conservation.城市保护的平衡艺术。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 29;11(1):3773. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17539-0.
9
Trends and knowledge gaps in field research investigating effects of anthropogenic noise.人为噪声影响的野外研究中的趋势和知识空白
Conserv Biol. 2021 Feb;35(1):115-129. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13510. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
10
Why conservation biology can benefit from sensory ecology.为什么保护生物学可以受益于感觉生态学。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Apr;4(4):502-511. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1135-4. Epub 2020 Mar 16.