• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

历史上的红线划定与美国鸟类生物多样性采样的地理差异不断扩大有关。

Historical redlining is associated with increasing geographical disparities in bird biodiversity sampling in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Nov;7(11):1869-1877. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01688-5. Epub 2023 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1038/s41562-023-01688-5
PMID:37679441
Abstract

Historic segregation and inequality are critical to understanding modern environmental conditions. Race-based zoning policies, such as redlining in the United States during the 1930s, are associated with racial inequity and adverse multigenerational socioeconomic levels in income and education, and disparate environmental characteristics including tree canopy cover across urban neighbourhoods. Here we quantify the association between redlining and bird biodiversity sampling density and completeness-two critical metrics of biodiversity knowledge-across 195 cities in the United States. We show that historically redlined neighbourhoods remain the most undersampled urban areas for bird biodiversity today, potentially impacting conservation priorities and propagating urban environmental inequities. The disparity in sampling across redlined neighbourhood grades increased by 35.6% over the past 20 years. We identify specific urban areas in need of increased bird biodiversity sampling and discuss possible strategies for reducing uncertainty and increasing equity of sampling of biodiversity in urban areas. Our findings highlight how human behaviour and past social, economic and political conditions not just segregate our built environment but may also leave a lasting mark on the digital information we have about urban biodiversity.

摘要

历史上的种族隔离和不平等现象是理解现代环境状况的关键。基于种族的分区政策,如 20 世纪 30 年代美国的“红线政策”,与种族不平等以及收入和教育方面的代际不利社会经济水平有关,也与包括城市社区树冠覆盖率在内的不同环境特征有关。在这里,我们量化了红线政策与鸟类生物多样性采样密度和完整性(生物多样性知识的两个关键指标)之间的关系,该研究在美国 195 个城市进行。结果表明,历史上被红线政策划分为低等社区的地区仍然是当今鸟类生物多样性采样最不足的城市地区,这可能会影响保护重点,并使城市环境不平等现象进一步恶化。在过去的 20 年里,红线政策划定的社区等级之间的采样差距增加了 35.6%。我们确定了需要增加鸟类生物多样性采样的特定城市地区,并讨论了减少城市地区生物多样性采样不确定性和增加采样公平性的可能策略。我们的研究结果表明,人类行为以及过去的社会、经济和政治条件不仅使我们的建筑环境隔离,而且可能还会对我们拥有的有关城市生物多样性的数字信息留下持久的印记。

相似文献

1
Historical redlining is associated with increasing geographical disparities in bird biodiversity sampling in the United States.历史上的红线划定与美国鸟类生物多样性采样的地理差异不断扩大有关。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Nov;7(11):1869-1877. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01688-5. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
2
Historical redlining is associated with disparities in wildlife biodiversity in four California cities.历史上的红线划定与加利福尼亚州四个城市的野生动物生物多样性差异有关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 18;121(25):e2321441121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2321441121. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
3
Race, historical redlining, and contemporary transportation noise disparities in the United States.美国的种族、历史上的红线划定以及当代交通噪音差异
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;35(1):50-61. doi: 10.1038/s41370-024-00682-x. Epub 2024 May 17.
4
Linking environmental injustices in Detroit, MI to institutional racial segregation through historical federal redlining.将密歇根州底特律的环境不公正与历史上的联邦红线制度下的制度性种族隔离联系起来。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2024 May;34(3):389-398. doi: 10.1038/s41370-022-00512-y. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
5
Structural Racism, Historical Redlining, and Incidence of Kidney Failure in US Cities, 2012-2019.结构性种族主义、历史上的红线政策与 2012-2019 年美国城市的肾衰竭发病率
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023 Sep 1;34(9):1493-1503. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000165. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
6
Historical redlining and food environments: A study of 102 urban areas in the United States.历史上的红线划定与食品环境:对美国 102 个城市地区的研究。
Health Place. 2022 May;75:102775. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102775. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
7
Association of Redlining and Natural Environment with Depressive Symptoms in Women in the Sister Study.红区划定与自然环境对姐妹研究中女性抑郁症状的关联。
Environ Health Perspect. 2023 Oct;131(10):107009. doi: 10.1289/EHP12212. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
8
Historical Redlining and Heart Failure Outcomes Following Hospitalization in the Southeastern United States.美国东南部地区历史上的红线划定与住院后心力衰竭结局。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Apr 16;13(8):e032019. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032019. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
9
The relationship between wealth and biodiversity: A test of the Luxury Effect on bird species richness in the developing world.财富与生物多样性的关系:对发展中国家鸟类物种丰富度的奢侈品效应的检验。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Sep;25(9):3045-3055. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14682. Epub 2019 May 30.
10
Historical redlining and park use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from big mobility data.历史上的红线划定与新冠疫情期间的公园使用:来自大移动数据的证据。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2024 May;34(3):399-406. doi: 10.1038/s41370-023-00569-3. Epub 2023 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping Environmental Inequalities: Using MapReader to Uncover Mid-Century Industrial Burdens.绘制环境不平等地图:使用MapReader揭示世纪中叶的工业负担。
Imago Mundi. 2024;76(2):284-290. doi: 10.1080/03085694.2024.2453333. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
2
Birdwatching in the digital age: how technologies shape relationships to birds.数字时代的观鸟:技术如何塑造人与鸟类的关系。
Bioscience. 2025 May 15;75(7):534-544. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biaf047. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Restoring landscapes and communities: Insights from critical, urban, and plant ecology.

本文引用的文献

1
Systemic racism alters wildlife genetic diversity.系统性种族主义改变了野生动物的遗传多样性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 25;119(43):e2102860119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102860119. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
2
Socio-ecological gap analysis to forecast species range contractions for conservation.用于预测物种范围收缩以进行保护的社会生态差距分析。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Sep 27;120(7):e2201942119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2201942119.
3
Outreach and Partnership Programs for Conservation Education Where Endangered Species Conservation and Research Occur.
恢复景观与社区:来自批判生态学、城市生态学和植物生态学的见解
Environ Sci Ecotechnol. 2025 Jul 12;27:100601. doi: 10.1016/j.ese.2025.100601. eCollection 2025 Sep.
4
Harmful Algae Forecasting through an Ocean Data Justice Lens.透过海洋数据正义视角进行有害藻类预测。
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Jun 24;59(24):11964-11973. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c10838. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
5
Some birds are left behind in a race to beat the heat.一些鸟类在竞相避暑的过程中掉队了。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1038/s41559-025-02727-2.
6
A systematic review of historic neighborhood redlining and contemporary health outcomes.对历史街区红线划定与当代健康结果的系统评价。
Public Health. 2025 Jan;238:181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.022. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
7
Historical redlining is associated with disparities in wildlife biodiversity in four California cities.历史上的红线划定与加利福尼亚州四个城市的野生动物生物多样性差异有关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 18;121(25):e2321441121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2321441121. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
8
Urban inequalities.城市不平等现象。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2024 Jan;8(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02311-6.
濒危物种保护与研究所在地的保护教育外展及伙伴关系项目。
Conserv Biol. 2002 Feb;16(1):4-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01613.x.
4
Colonial history and global economics distort our understanding of deep-time biodiversity.殖民历史和全球经济扭曲了我们对远古时期生物多样性的理解。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2022 Feb;6(2):145-154. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01608-8. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
5
Estimating experienced racial segregation in US cities using large-scale GPS data.利用大规模 GPS 数据估算美国城市的经验种族隔离程度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 16;118(46). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2026160118.
6
An ecosystem service perspective on urban nature, physical activity, and health.从生态系统服务角度看城市自然、身体活动与健康。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 1;118(22). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2018472118.
7
Redlines and Greenspace: The Relationship between Historical Redlining and 2010 Greenspace across the United States.红线与绿地:美国历史红线与 2010 年绿地之间的关系。
Environ Health Perspect. 2021 Jan;129(1):17006. doi: 10.1289/EHP7495. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
8
Overcoming Blind Spots to Promote Environmental Justice Research.克服盲点,促进环境正义研究。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2021 Apr;36(4):269-273. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.12.011. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
9
Improving big citizen science data: Moving beyond haphazard sampling.提高公民科学大数据质量:超越随意采样。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Jun 27;17(6):e3000357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000357. eCollection 2019 Jun.
10
Optimizing the conservation of migratory species over their full annual cycle.优化迁徙物种全年周期的保护。
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 15;10(1):1754. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09723-8.