• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

党派利益塑造:外党影响、地域选择与伴侣选择。

Partisan niche construction: Out-party affect, geographic sorting, and mate selection.

机构信息

Rice University, Houston, TX, USA,

出版信息

Politics Life Sci. 2023 Nov;42(2):254-276. doi: 10.1017/pls.2023.19.

DOI:10.1017/pls.2023.19
PMID:37987571
Abstract

Partisans in the American electorate are affectively polarized, which coincides with the tendency for partisan geographic sorting. Could mate selection pressures contribute to this geographic tendency, and how might they interact with out-party affect? I propose a model in which an individual's perception of their mate success in a niche is key. I argue that perceived mate success is a function of a niche's partisanship and one's out-party affect, which in turn, incentivizes sorting. The model is partially tested with conjoint experiments on multiple U.S. samples. Results show that partisans perceive a lower probability of mate success in niches with greater shares of out-partisans and that mate success interacts with negative out-party affect. I also replicate findings on political mate choice preferences with a more appropriate method. Lastly, this project links instrumentality and affect, which is a departure from past work. In doing so, it contributes to research on the consequences of mate pressures for political behavior.

摘要

美国选民中的党派人士在情感上存在两极分化,这与党派地理分化的趋势相吻合。配偶选择压力是否会导致这种地理倾向,以及它们如何与党外情感相互作用?我提出了一个模型,其中个体在利基市场中对配偶成功的感知是关键。我认为,感知到的配偶成功是利基市场的党派性和个体党外情感的函数,这反过来又激励了这种分化。该模型部分通过对多个美国样本的联合实验进行了测试。结果表明,党派人士认为在党外人士比例较高的利基市场中,找到配偶的成功概率较低,而且配偶的成功与负面的党外情感相互作用。我还通过更合适的方法复制了关于政治配偶选择偏好的发现。最后,该项目将工具性和情感联系起来,这与过去的工作有所不同。这样做有助于研究配偶压力对政治行为的影响。

相似文献

1
Partisan niche construction: Out-party affect, geographic sorting, and mate selection.党派利益塑造:外党影响、地域选择与伴侣选择。
Politics Life Sci. 2023 Nov;42(2):254-276. doi: 10.1017/pls.2023.19.
2
Mixed partisan households and electoral participation in the United States.美国混合党派家庭与选举参与。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 10;13(10):e0203997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203997. eCollection 2018.
3
Migration and political polarization in the U.S.: An analysis of the county-level migration network.美国的移民与政治极化:对县级移民网络的分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 22;14(11):e0225405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225405. eCollection 2019.
4
Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion.不受约束的党派人士:美国政治极化与公众舆论趋势
AJS. 2008 Jan 28;114(2):408-446. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1010098.
5
Negative partisanship is not more prevalent than positive partisanship.负面党派偏见并不比正面党派偏见更普遍。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Jul;6(7):951-963. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01348-0. Epub 2022 May 19.
6
Perceiver and target partisanship shift facial trustworthiness effects on likability.感知者和目标党派转移对面部可信度的影响,从而影响喜好度。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 15;13(1):6130. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33307-8.
7
How warm are political interactions? A new measure of affective fractionalization.政治互动有多热烈?情感碎片化的新衡量标准。
PLoS One. 2024 May 14;19(5):e0294401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294401. eCollection 2024.
8
Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.感知美国的政治极化:党派认同强度和态度极端性加剧了感知到的党派分歧。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;10(2):145-58. doi: 10.1177/1745691615569849.
9
The July 2024 Trump assassination attempt was followed by lower in-group support for partisan violence and increased group unity.2024 年 7 月针对特朗普的刺杀未遂事件发生后,群体内部支持党派暴力的比例下降,群体团结度上升。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Dec 3;121(49):e2414689121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2414689121. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
10
Issue alignment and partisanship in the American public: Revisiting the 'partisans without constraint' thesis.美国公众的议题一致性与党派偏见:重新审视“肆无忌惮的党派人士”论点。
Soc Sci Res. 2021 Feb;94:102498. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102498. Epub 2020 Nov 27.