Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA and Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC,
Politics Life Sci. 2023 Nov;42(2):277-290. doi: 10.1017/pls.2023.14.
Partisans have biased perceptions of objective conditions. At first glance, the COVID-19 pandemic would appear to be an example of this phenomenon. Noting that most citizens have consistently about the pandemic, I argue that we have overlooked pre-political factors that are as influential as partisanship in shaping citizens' responses to the pandemic. I identify one such construct in perceived vulnerability to infectious disease (PVD). In one cross-sectional study and one panel study, I find that the influence of PVD on citizens' perceptions of COVID-19 equals that of partisanship. I also find that PVD can moderate the influence of partisanship on perceptions of harmfulness, nearly erasing the impact of being a Republican on perceiving COVID-19 as a threat. When led by PVD as well as partisanship to accurately perceive harm, citizens, including Republicans, attribute more responsibility to former president Donald Trump for his failed handling of the crisis.
游击队员对客观条件存在偏见。乍一看,COVID-19 大流行似乎就是这种现象的一个例子。注意到大多数公民一直对大流行持悲观态度,我认为我们忽视了政治前因素,这些因素在塑造公民对大流行的反应方面与党派偏见一样有影响力。我确定了一个这样的结构,即对传染病易感性的感知(PVD)。在一项横断面研究和一项面板研究中,我发现 PVD 对公民对 COVID-19 的看法的影响与党派偏见相当。我还发现,PVD 可以调节党派偏见对危害性的影响,几乎消除了作为共和党人对 COVID-19 作为威胁的看法的影响。当 PVD 和党派偏见引导人们准确感知危害时,包括共和党人在内的公民将更多的责任归咎于前总统唐纳德·特朗普,因为他未能处理这场危机。