Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Centre Ressource de Réhabilitation Psychosociale et de Remédiation Cognitive, Pôle Centre rive gauche, Hôpital Le Vinatier, UMR 5229, CNRS & Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Sci Rep. 2022 May 30;12(1):8994. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12790-5.
While Republican states have been criticized for their limited efforts to contain the spread of COVID-19, it is important to consider that political orientation can modify human behaviour via complex effects that are still poorly understood. During the first period of the pandemic, we found that the association of Republican partisanship with US citizens' mobility varied depending on the nature of the exposure being considered. First, Republican partisanship was associated with increased mobility when the stringency of anti-COVID measures increased. Second, Republican partisanship was associated with decreased mobility when COVID-related deaths increased. Third, Republican partisanship was associated with increased mobility over time, i.e. as time went by, citizens living in Republican states were more mobile than those in Democratic states. These findings raise caution on any over-interpretation of the impact of polarization in US politics on COVID-related behaviour. They prompt consideration of persuasive tools that emphasize risk perception to promote social distancing in Republican states, rather than relying heavily on stringent anti-COVID interventions.
虽然共和党州因控制 COVID-19 传播的努力有限而受到批评,但重要的是要考虑到政治取向可以通过复杂的、尚未被充分理解的效应来改变人类行为。在疫情的第一阶段,我们发现,共和党的党派倾向与美国公民的流动性之间的关联因所考虑的暴露性质而异。首先,当抗 COVID 措施的严格程度增加时,共和党的党派倾向与更高的流动性相关联。其次,当 COVID 相关死亡人数增加时,共和党的党派倾向与更低的流动性相关联。第三,共和党的党派倾向与随时间推移的流动性增加相关联,即随着时间的推移,居住在共和党州的公民比居住在民主党州的公民更具流动性。这些发现提醒人们不要过度解释美国政治中的两极分化对 COVID 相关行为的影响。它们促使人们考虑使用强调风险感知的说服工具,以促进共和党州的社交距离,而不是严重依赖严格的抗 COVID 干预措施。