Neuroscience Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Scientific Computing, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Jun;9(2):356-365. doi: 10.1177/23969873231214218. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
Neurology senior residents and stroke fellows are first to clinically assess and interpret imaging studies of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute stroke. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of brain CT angiography (CTA) with and without CT perfusion (CTP) between neurology senior residents and stroke fellows.
In this neuroimaging study, nine practitioners (four senior neurology residents (SNRs) and five stroke fellows (SFs)) clinically assessed and interpreted the imaging data of 50 cases (15 normal images, 21 large vessel occlusions (LVOs) and 14 medium vessel occlusions (MeVOs) in two sessions, 1 week apart in comparison to final diagnosis of experienced neuroradiologist and experienced stroke neurologist consensus. Interrater agreement of CTA alone and CTA with CTP was quantified using kappa statistics, sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy.
Overall, arterial occlusions were correctly identified in 221/315 (70.1%) with CTA alone and in 266/315 (84.4%) with CTA and CTP ( < 0.001). The sensitivity of overall arterial occlusions detection with CTA alone was 94.2% (95% CI: 90.8%-96.6%) while with addition of CTP was 98% (95% CI: 95.6%-99.3%), The specificity of CTA alone was 74.7% (95% CI: 67.2%-81.3%) which increased with CTP to 84.4% (95% CI: 77.7%-89.8%). The likelihood of correct identification with CTA alone was 156/189 (82.54%) for LVOs and 65/126 (51.59%) for MeVOs. This increased to 169/189 (89.42%; = 0.054) for LVOs and 97/126 (76.98%; < 0.001) for MeVOs when the CTA images with CTP were viewed. There was good overall interrater agreement between readers when using CTA alone ( 0.71, 95% CI, 0.62-0.80) and almost perfect ( 0.85, 95% CI, 0.76-0.94) when CTP was added to the image for interpretation. CTA and CTP had a significantly lower median interquartile range (IQR) interpretation time than CTA alone (114 [IQR, 103-120] s vs 156 [IQR, 133-160] s, < 0.001).
In cerebral arterial occlusions, the rate of LVO and MeVOs detections increases when adding CTP to CTA. The accuracy and time for diagnosing arterial occlusion can be significantly improved if CTP is added to CTA. As MeVOs are commonly missed by front-line neurology senior residents or stroke fellows, cases with significant deficits and no apparent arterial occlusions need to be reviewed with neuroradiological expertise.
神经科住院医师和卒中研究员是最先对急诊科出现急性卒中的患者进行临床评估和解读影像研究的人。本研究的目的是比较神经科住院医师和卒中研究员在使用和不使用 CT 灌注(CTP)的情况下,对脑部 CT 血管造影(CTA)的诊断准确性。
在这项神经影像学研究中,9 名医生(4 名神经科住院医师(SNR)和 5 名卒中研究员(SF))在两次评估中对 50 例患者的影像数据进行了临床评估和解读,两次评估相隔 1 周,与经验丰富的神经放射科医生和经验丰富的卒中神经科医生的共识最终诊断进行比较。使用 Kappa 统计、敏感性、特异性和总体准确性来量化 CTA 单独和 CTA 加 CTP 的一致性。
总的来说,动脉闭塞在 CTA 单独使用时正确识别了 221/315 例(70.1%),在 CTA 加 CTP 时正确识别了 266/315 例(84.4%)(<0.001)。CTA 单独检测整体动脉闭塞的敏感性为 94.2%(95%CI:90.8%-96.6%),而加用 CTP 时为 98%(95%CI:95.6%-99.3%)。CTA 单独的特异性为 74.7%(95%CI:67.2%-81.3%),而加用 CTP 时为 84.4%(95%CI:77.7%-89.8%)。在 CTA 单独使用时,LVOs 的正确识别率为 156/189(82.54%),MeVOs 为 65/126(51.59%)。当观察 CTA 加 CTP 图像时,LVOs 的正确识别率增加到 169/189(89.42%;=0.054),MeVOs 的正确识别率增加到 97/126(76.98%;<0.001)。当使用 CTA 单独时,读者之间的总体评分一致性良好(0.71,95%CI,0.62-0.80),当添加 CTP 进行解释时,几乎完美(0.85,95%CI,0.76-0.94)。CTA 和 CTP 的中位数四分位距(IQR)解读时间明显低于 CTA 单独使用(114 [IQR,103-120] s 与 156 [IQR,133-160] s,<0.001)。
在大脑动脉闭塞中,添加 CTP 可增加 LVO 和 MeVOs 的检测率。如果将 CTP 添加到 CTA 中,诊断动脉闭塞的准确性和时间可以显著提高。由于 MeVOs 通常被一线神经科住院医师或卒中研究员遗漏,如果有明显的缺陷且没有明显的动脉闭塞,需要由神经放射学专家进行复查。