Elsherif Salah, Legere Brittney, Mohamed Ahmed, Saqqur Razan, Fatima Nida, Saqqur Maher, Shuaib Ashfaq
Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Department of Applied Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Int J Stroke. 2025 Mar;20(3):278-288. doi: 10.1177/17474930241292915. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
Non-contrast cranial computed tomography (NCCT) and CT angiogram (CTA) have become essential for endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute stroke. Patient selection may improve when CT perfusion (CTP) imaging is also added for patient selection. We aimed to analyze the effects of implementing CTP in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients' treatment to assess whether stroke outcomes differ in the late window.
We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Sciences databases to obtain articles related to CTA and CTP in EVT. Collected patient data were split into two groups: the CTP and control (NCCT + CTA) cohorts. Primary outcomes evaluated were modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages (sICHs), mortality, and successful recanalization.
There were 14 studies with 5809 total patients in the final analysis: 2602 received CTP and 3202 were in the control group. CTP/CTA patients showed significantly lower rates of 90-day stroke-related mortality (odds ratio (OR) = 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.60-0.87, < 0.01) and significantly higher successful recanalization (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.06-1.94, < 0.01) compared with CTA-only patients. Analysis of other outcomes including functional independence (mRS = 0-2), critical times, and intracranial hemorrhages was non-significant ( > 0.05).
The study highlights the usefulness of CTP-guided therapy as a supplementary tool in EVT selection in the late window. Although the addition of CTP resulted in lower mortality, the favorable outcomes did not improve. Further evidence is required to establish a clearer understanding of the potential advantages or limitations of incorporating CTP in stroke imaging.
非增强头颅计算机断层扫描(NCCT)和CT血管造影(CTA)已成为急性卒中血管内治疗(EVT)的重要手段。在进行患者选择时,若增加CT灌注(CTP)成像,可能会改善患者的选择情况。我们旨在分析在急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者治疗中应用CTP的效果,以评估晚期时间窗内卒中结局是否存在差异。
我们检索了PubMed、Embase和Web of Sciences数据库,以获取与EVT中CTA和CTP相关的文章。收集的患者数据被分为两组:CTP组和对照组(NCCT + CTA)。评估的主要结局指标包括改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分、症状性颅内出血(sICH)、死亡率和成功再通。
最终分析纳入了14项研究,共5809例患者:2602例接受了CTP检查,3202例在对照组。与仅接受CTA检查的患者相比,接受CTP/CTA检查的患者90天卒中相关死亡率显著降低(优势比(OR)= 0.72,95%置信区间(CI)= 0.60 - 0.87,P < 0.01),成功再通率显著更高(OR = 1.42,95% CI = 1.06 - 1.94,P < 0.01)。对包括功能独立性(mRS = 0 - 2)、关键时间和颅内出血在内的其他结局指标的分析无显著差异(P > 0.05)。
该研究强调了CTP引导治疗作为晚期时间窗内EVT选择辅助工具的有用性。虽然增加CTP可降低死亡率,但并未改善良好结局。需要更多证据来更清楚地了解在卒中成像中纳入CTP的潜在优势或局限性。