From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.M.O., F.B., R.V.M., N.K., W.Q., B.K.M., M.G.).
Department of Radiology (J.M.O.), University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022 Jan;43(1):93-97. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7361. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
Accurate and reliable detection of medium-vessel occlusions is important to establish the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke and initiate appropriate treatment with intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy. However, medium-vessel occlusions are often challenging to detect, especially for unexperienced readers. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy and interrater agreement of the detection of medium-vessel occlusions using single-phase and multiphase CTA.
Single-phase and multiphase CTA of 120 patients with acute ischemic stroke (20 with no occlusion, 44 with large-vessel occlusion, and 56 with medium-vessel occlusion in the anterior and posterior circulation) were assessed by 3 readers with varying levels of experience (session 1: single-phase CTA; session 2: multiphase CTA). Interrater agreement for occlusion type (large-vessel occlusion versus medium-vessel occlusion versus no occlusion) and for detailed occlusion sites was calculated using the Fleiss κ with 95% confidence intervals. Accuracy for the detection of medium-vessel occlusions was calculated for each reader using classification tables.
Interrater agreement for occlusion type was moderate for single-phase CTA (κ = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.56-0.62) and almost perfect for multiphase CTA (κ = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.78-0.83). Interrater agreement for detailed occlusion sites was moderate for single-phase CTA (κ = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.53-0.56) and substantial for multiphase CTA (κ = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.67-0.74). On single-phase CTA, readers 1, 2, and 3 classified 33/56 (59%), 34/56 (61%), and 32/56 (57%) correctly as medium-vessel occlusions. On multiphase CTA, 48/56 (86%), 50/56 (89%), and 50/56 (89%) medium-vessel occlusions were classified correctly.
Interrater agreement for medium-vessel occlusions is moderate when using single-phase CTA and almost perfect with multiphase CTA. Detection accuracy is substantially higher with multiphase CTA compared with single-phase CTA, suggesting that multiphase CTA might be a valuable tool for assessment of medium-vessel occlusion stroke.
准确可靠地检测中等血管闭塞对于急性缺血性脑卒中的诊断以及及时进行静脉溶栓或血管内取栓治疗至关重要。然而,中等血管闭塞的检测往往具有挑战性,尤其是对经验不足的读者而言。本研究旨在评估单期和多期 CTA 检测中等血管闭塞的准确性和观察者间一致性。
对 120 例急性缺血性脑卒中患者(20 例无闭塞,44 例大血管闭塞,56 例前循环和后循环中等血管闭塞)的单期和多期 CTA 进行评估,由 3 名具有不同经验水平的观察者(第 1 次评估:单期 CTA;第 2 次评估:多期 CTA)进行。采用 Fleiss κ 计算观察者间对闭塞类型(大血管闭塞与中等血管闭塞与无闭塞)和详细闭塞部位的一致性,置信区间为 95%。使用分类表计算每位观察者检测中等血管闭塞的准确性。
单期 CTA 观察者间对闭塞类型的一致性为中等(κ=0.58;95%CI,0.56-0.62),多期 CTA 的一致性为近乎完美(κ=0.81;95%CI,0.78-0.83)。单期 CTA 观察者间对详细闭塞部位的一致性为中等(κ=0.55;95%CI,0.53-0.56),多期 CTA 的一致性为显著(κ=0.71;95%CI,0.67-0.74)。在单期 CTA 上,观察者 1、2 和 3 分别正确分类 33/56(59%)、34/56(61%)和 32/56(57%)为中等血管闭塞。在多期 CTA 上,48/56(86%)、50/56(89%)和 50/56(89%)的中等血管闭塞被正确分类。
使用单期 CTA 时,中等血管闭塞的观察者间一致性为中等,而使用多期 CTA 时几乎为完美。与单期 CTA 相比,多期 CTA 的检测准确性显著更高,提示多期 CTA 可能是评估中等血管闭塞性脑卒中的一种有价值的工具。