Department of Medical Microbiology, Shi-Gan International College of Science and Technology, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Department of Microbiology, Nepal Armed Police Force Hospital, Balambu, Kathmandu, Nepal.
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 22;18(11):e0294646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294646. eCollection 2023.
The lack of standardized methods for detecting biofilms continues to pose a challenge to microbiological diagnostics since biofilm-mediated infections induce persistent and recurrent infections in humans that often defy treatment with common antibiotics. This study aimed to evaluate diagnostic parameters of four in vitro phenotypic biofilm detection assays in relation to antimicrobial resistance in aerobic clinical bacterial isolates.
In this cross-sectional study, bacterial strains from clinical samples were isolated and identified following the standard microbiological guidelines. The antibiotic resistance profile was assessed through the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Biofilm formation was detected by gold standard tissue culture plate method (TCPM), tube method (TM), Congo red agar (CRA), and modified Congo red agar (MCRA). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 17.0, with a significant association considered at p<0.05.
Among the total isolates (n = 226), TCPM detected 140 (61.95%) biofilm producers, with CoNS (9/9) (p<0.001) as the predominant biofilm former. When compared to TCPM, TM (n = 119) (p<0.001) showed 90.8% sensitivity and 70.1% specificity, CRA (n = 88) (p = 0.123) showed 68.2% sensitivity and 42% specificity, and MCRA (n = 86) (p = 0.442) showed 65.1% sensitivity and 40% specificity. Juxtaposed to CRA, colonies formed on MCRA developed more intense black pigmentation from 24 to 96 hours. There were 77 multi-drug-resistant (MDR)-biofilm formers and 39 extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-biofilm formers, with 100% resistance to ampicillin and ceftazidime, respectively.
It is suggested that TM be used for biofilm detection, after TCPM. Unlike MCRA, black pigmentation in colonies formed on CRA declined with time. MDR- and XDR-biofilm formers were frequent among the clinical isolates.
由于生物膜介导的感染会导致人类持续和反复感染,而这些感染通常对抗生素治疗无效,因此缺乏标准化的生物膜检测方法仍然是微生物诊断的一个挑战。本研究旨在评估四种体外表型生物膜检测方法的诊断参数与需氧临床细菌分离株的抗生素耐药性的关系。
在这项横断面研究中,按照标准微生物学指南从临床标本中分离和鉴定细菌株。通过 Kirby-Bauer 纸片扩散法评估抗生素耐药谱。通过金标准组织培养平板法(TCPM)、管法(TM)、刚果红琼脂(CRA)和改良刚果红琼脂(MCRA)检测生物膜形成。使用 SPSS 版本 17.0 进行统计分析,p<0.05 为差异有统计学意义。
在总分离株(n=226)中,TCPM 检测到 140 株(61.95%)生物膜形成菌,其中凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CoNS)(9/9)(p<0.001)是主要的生物膜形成菌。与 TCPM 相比,TM(n=119)(p<0.001)的灵敏度为 90.8%,特异性为 70.1%,CRA(n=88)(p=0.123)的灵敏度为 68.2%,特异性为 42%,MCRA(n=86)(p=0.442)的灵敏度为 65.1%,特异性为 40%。与 CRA 相比,MCRA 上形成的菌落从 24 小时到 96 小时形成更强烈的黑色色素沉着。有 77 株多药耐药(MDR)-生物膜形成菌和 39 株广泛耐药(XDR)-生物膜形成菌,对氨苄西林和头孢他啶的耐药率分别为 100%。
建议在 TCPM 之后使用 TM 进行生物膜检测。与 MCRA 不同,CRA 上形成的菌落的黑色色素沉着随时间减少。MDR 和 XDR 生物膜形成菌在临床分离株中较为常见。