Suppr超能文献

混合使用景观中土地利用、土地覆被、植物属和传粉媒介丰度的关系。

Association between land use, land cover, plant genera, and pollinator abundance in mixed-use landscapes.

机构信息

School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Nov 22;18(11):e0294749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294749. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Pollinators are threatened by land-use and land-cover changes, with the magnitude of the threat depending on the pollinating taxa, land-use type and intensity, the amount of natural habitat remaining, and the ecosystem considered. This study aims to determine the effect of land use (protected areas, plantations, pastures), land cover (percentage of forest and open areas within buffers of different sizes), and plant genera on the relative abundance of nectivorous birds (honeyeaters), bees (native and introduced), and beetles in the mixed-use landscape of the Tasman Peninsula (Tasmania, Australia) using mixed-effect models. We found the predictor selected (through model selection based on R2) and the effect of the predictors varied depending on the pollinating taxa. The land-use predictors were selected for only the honeyeater abundance model with protected areas and plantations having substantive positive effects. Land-cover predictors were selected for the honeyeater and native bee abundance models with open land cover within 1500 m and 250 m buffers having substantive negative and positive effects on honeyeaters and native bees respectively. Bees and beetles were observed on 24 plant genera of which only native plants (and not invasive/naturalised) were positively associated with pollinating insects. Pultenaea and Leucopogon were positively associated with native bees while Leucopogon, Lissanthe, Pimelea, and Pomaderris were positively associated with introduced bees. Leptospermum was the only plant genus positively associated with beetles. Our results highlight that one size does not fit all-that is pollinator responses to different landscape characteristics vary, emphasising the importance of considering multiple habitat factors to manage and support different pollinator taxa.

摘要

传粉媒介受到土地利用和土地覆盖变化的威胁,其威胁程度取决于传粉类群、土地利用类型和强度、自然栖息地的剩余数量以及所考虑的生态系统。本研究旨在使用混合效应模型确定土地利用(保护区、种植园、牧场)、土地覆盖(不同大小缓冲区中森林和开阔地的百分比)和植物属对塔斯曼半岛(塔斯马尼亚州,澳大利亚)混合用途景观中花蜜鸟(吸蜜鸟)、蜜蜂(本地和引入)和甲虫相对丰度的影响。我们发现,所选预测因子(通过基于 R2 的模型选择)以及预测因子的影响因传粉类群而异。只有保护区和种植园的土地利用预测因子被选为吸蜜鸟丰度模型的选择,它们具有实质性的正效应。土地覆盖预测因子被选为吸蜜鸟和本地蜜蜂丰度模型的选择,1500 米和 250 米缓冲区的开阔土地覆盖对吸蜜鸟和本地蜜蜂分别具有实质性的负向和正向影响。在 24 个植物属中观察到蜜蜂和甲虫,其中只有本地植物(而非入侵/归化)与传粉昆虫呈正相关。Pultenaea 和 Leucopogon 与本地蜜蜂呈正相关,而 Leucopogon、Lissanthe、Pimelea 和 Pomaderris 与引入蜜蜂呈正相关。Leptospermum 是唯一与甲虫呈正相关的植物属。我们的结果强调,一种方法并不适用于所有情况——即传粉媒介对不同景观特征的反应不同,这强调了考虑多种生境因素来管理和支持不同传粉媒介类群的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9152/10664889/b962de84af09/pone.0294749.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验