• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血液细胞差异计数离散化建模预测急诊成人患者的生存情况:一项回顾性队列研究。

Blood cell differential count discretisation modelling to predict survival in adults reporting to the emergency room: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Dipartimento Emergenza Accettazione, Pronto Soccorso, Ospedale Alessandro Manzoni, Lecco, LC, Italy.

Klinik für Angiologie, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 22;13(11):e071937. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071937.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071937
PMID:37993167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10668290/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the survival predictivity of baseline blood cell differential count (BCDC), discretised according to two different methods, in adults visiting an emergency room (ER) for illness or trauma over 1 year.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of hospital records.

SETTING

Tertiary care public hospital in northern Italy.

PARTICIPANTS

11 052 patients aged >18 years, consecutively admitted to the ER in 1 year, and for whom BCDC collection was indicated by ER medical staff at first presentation.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Survival was the referral outcome for explorative model development. Automated BCDC analysis at baseline assessed haemoglobin, mean cell volume (MCV), red cell distribution width (RDW), platelet distribution width (PDW), platelet haematocrit (PCT), absolute red blood cells, white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils and platelets. Discretisation cut-offs were defined by benchmark and tailored methods. Benchmark cut-offs were stated based on laboratory reference values (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute). Tailored cut-offs for linear, sigmoid-shaped and U-shaped distributed variables were discretised by maximally selected rank statistics and by optimal-equal HR, respectively. Explanatory variables (age, gender, ER admission during SARS-CoV2 surges and in-hospital admission) were analysed using Cox multivariable regression. Receiver operating curves were drawn by summing the Cox-significant variables for each method.

RESULTS

Of 11 052 patients (median age 67 years, IQR 51-81, 48% female), 59% (n=6489) were discharged and 41% (n=4563) were admitted to the hospital. After a 306-day median follow-up (IQR 208-417 days), 9455 (86%) patients were alive and 1597 (14%) deceased. Increased HRs were associated with age >73 years (HR=4.6, 95% CI=4.0 to 5.2), in-hospital admission (HR=2.2, 95% CI=1.9 to 2.4), ER admission during SARS-CoV2 surges (Wave I: HR=1.7, 95% CI=1.5 to 1.9; Wave II: HR=1.2, 95% CI=1.0 to 1.3). Gender, haemoglobin, MCV, RDW, PDW, neutrophils, lymphocytes and eosinophil counts were significant overall. Benchmark-BCDC model included basophils and platelet count (area under the ROC (AUROC) 0.74). Tailored-BCDC model included monocyte counts and PCT (AUROC 0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline discretised BCDC provides meaningful insight regarding ER patients' survival.

摘要

目的

评估根据两种不同方法离散的基线血细胞差异计数(BCDC)在 1 年以上因疾病或外伤就诊于急诊室(ER)的成年人中的生存预测能力。

设计

医院记录的回顾性队列研究。

地点

意大利北部的三级保健公立医院。

参与者

11052 名年龄大于 18 岁的患者,连续 1 年在 ER 就诊,并且 ER 医务人员在首次就诊时表明需要采集 BCDC。

主要结局

生存是探索性模型开发的参考结果。基线时的自动 BCDC 分析评估了血红蛋白、平均细胞体积(MCV)、红细胞分布宽度(RDW)、血小板分布宽度(PDW)、血小板血细胞比容(PCT)、绝对红细胞、白细胞、中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、单核细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞、嗜碱性粒细胞和血小板。离散截止值通过基准和定制方法定义。基准截止值基于实验室参考值(临床和实验室标准协会)。对于线性、S 形和 U 形分布变量,通过最大选择秩统计和最佳相等 HR 分别对定制截止值进行离散化。使用 Cox 多变量回归分析解释变量(年龄、性别、SARS-CoV2 激增期间和住院期间的 ER 入院)。为每种方法绘制了接收者操作曲线,方法是将 Cox 显著变量相加。

结果

在 11052 名患者中(中位数年龄 67 岁,IQR 51-81,48%为女性),59%(n=6489)出院,41%(n=4563)住院。在中位数为 306 天的随访(IQR 208-417 天)后,9455 名(86%)患者存活,1597 名(14%)死亡。较高的 HR 与年龄>73 岁(HR=4.6,95%CI=4.0 至 5.2)、住院(HR=2.2,95%CI=1.9 至 2.4)、SARS-CoV2 激增期间的 ER 入院(波 I:HR=1.7,95%CI=1.5 至 1.9;波 II:HR=1.2,95%CI=1.0 至 1.3)相关。性别、血红蛋白、MCV、RDW、PDW、中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞计数总体上均有意义。基准-BCDC 模型包括嗜碱性粒细胞和血小板计数(ROC 下面积(AUROC)为 0.74)。定制-BCDC 模型包括单核细胞计数和 PCT(AUROC 为 0.79)。

结论

基线离散 BCDC 为 ER 患者的生存提供了有意义的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1f/10668290/0065f1671381/bmjopen-2023-071937f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1f/10668290/5dc25cc3561e/bmjopen-2023-071937f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1f/10668290/0065f1671381/bmjopen-2023-071937f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1f/10668290/5dc25cc3561e/bmjopen-2023-071937f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b1f/10668290/0065f1671381/bmjopen-2023-071937f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Blood cell differential count discretisation modelling to predict survival in adults reporting to the emergency room: a retrospective cohort study.血液细胞差异计数离散化建模预测急诊成人患者的生存情况:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 22;13(11):e071937. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071937.
2
Diagnostic value of red blood cell distribution width, platelet distribution width, and red blood cell distribution width to platelet ratio in children with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.红细胞分布宽度、血小板分布宽度和红细胞分布宽度与血小板比值对噬血细胞性淋巴组织细胞增生症患儿的诊断价值。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2021 Sep;35(9):e23909. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23909. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
3
Prognostic significance of red cell distribution width and other red cell parameters in patients with chronic heart failure during two years of follow-up.慢性心力衰竭患者红细胞分布宽度及其他红细胞参数在两年随访期间的预后意义
Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(7):657-64. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2016.0004. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
4
[Prognostic value of hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio in patients with cardiopulmonary resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest].[血红蛋白与红细胞分布宽度比值对院外心脏骤停心肺复苏患者的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Sep;35(9):958-962. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230207-00066.
5
Mean Platelet Volume (MPV), Platelet Distribution Width (PDW), Platelet Count and Plateletcrit (PCT) as predictors of in-hospital paediatric mortality: a case-control Study.平均血小板体积(MPV)、血小板分布宽度(PDW)、血小板计数和血小板压积(PCT)作为儿科住院死亡率的预测指标:一项病例对照研究。
Afr Health Sci. 2016 Jun;16(2):356-62. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v16i2.3.
6
COVID-19 disease-Temporal analyses of complete blood count parameters over course of illness, and relationship to patient demographics and management outcomes in survivors and non-survivors: A longitudinal descriptive cohort study.COVID-19 疾病-疾病过程中全血细胞计数参数的时间分析,以及与幸存者和非幸存者患者人口统计学和管理结果的关系:一项纵向描述性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0244129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244129. eCollection 2020.
7
Association between platelet indices and the severity of the disease and mortality in patients with COVID-19.血小板指标与 COVID-19 患者疾病严重程度和死亡率的关系。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Nov;25(21):6731-6740. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202111_27118.
8
Full blood count values as a predictor of poor outcome of pneumonia among HIV-infected patients.全血细胞计数值可预测 HIV 感染患者肺炎的不良预后。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Apr 19;18(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3090-0.
9
Clinical usefulness of mean platelet volume and red blood cell distribution width to platelet ratio for predicting the severity of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B virus patients.平均血小板体积和红细胞分布宽度与血小板比值对预测慢性乙型肝炎病毒患者肝纤维化严重程度的临床实用性。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Dec;26(12):1320-4. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000203.
10
A Retrospective Cohort Study on the Association between Red Cell Distribution Width and All-Cause Mortality of Patients with Cholecystitis at ICU Admission.回顾性队列研究:入院时 ICU 胆囊炎患者红细胞分布宽度与全因死亡率的关系。
Dis Markers. 2021 Oct 13;2021:9625220. doi: 10.1155/2021/9625220. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
The 'analysis of gene expression and biomarkers for point-of-care decision support in Sepsis' study; temporal clinical parameter analysis and validation of early diagnostic biomarker signatures for severe inflammation andsepsis-SIRS discrimination.用于脓毒症即时决策支持的基因表达和生物标志物分析研究;严重炎症和脓毒症-全身炎症反应综合征鉴别诊断的即时临床参数分析和早期诊断生物标志物特征验证。
Front Immunol. 2024 Jan 25;14:1308530. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1308530. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
High Red Cell Distribution Width and Low Absolute Lymphocyte Count Associate With Subsequent Mortality in HCV Infection.红细胞分布宽度高和绝对淋巴细胞计数低与丙型肝炎病毒感染后的死亡率相关。
Pathog Immun. 2021 Oct 7;6(2):90-104. doi: 10.20411/pai.v6i2.467. eCollection 2021.
2
Parameters of the complete blood count predict in hospital mortality.全血细胞计数参数可预测住院死亡率。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2022 Feb;44(1):88-95. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13684. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
3
Lymphopenia in hospitalized patients and its relationship with severity of illness and mortality.
住院患者的淋巴细胞减少症及其与疾病严重程度和死亡率的关系。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 13;16(8):e0256205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256205. eCollection 2021.
4
Eosinopenia is a reliable marker of severe disease and unfavourable outcome in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.嗜酸性粒细胞减少症是 COVID-19 肺炎患者严重疾病和不良预后的可靠标志物。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Jul;75(7):e14047. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14047. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
5
Eosinopenia in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Analysis.新冠病毒肺炎患者的嗜酸性粒细胞减少症:一项回顾性分析。
Microorganisms. 2020 Dec 4;8(12):1929. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8121929.
6
Lymphopenia and mortality among patients undergoing coronary angiography: Long-term follow-up study.行冠状动脉造影术患者的淋巴细胞减少症与死亡率:长期随访研究。
Cardiol J. 2022;29(4):637-646. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0141. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
7
Incidental lymphopenia and mortality: a prospective cohort study.偶然发现的淋巴细胞减少症与死亡率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
CMAJ. 2020 Jan 13;192(2):E25-E33. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.191024.
8
Association of Lymphopenia With Risk of Mortality Among Adults in the US General Population.淋巴细胞减少与美国普通人群中成年人死亡率风险的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1916526. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16526.
9
Perioperative lymphocytopenia predicts mortality and severe complications after intestinal surgery.围手术期淋巴细胞减少可预测肠道手术后的死亡率和严重并发症。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Jul;7(14):311. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.06.46.
10
A novel approach to determine two optimal cut-points of a continuous predictor with a U-shaped relationship to hazard ratio in survival data: simulation and application.一种新方法,用于确定与生存数据中危害比呈 U 形关系的连续预测因子的两个最佳切点:模拟和应用。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 May 9;19(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0738-4.