School of Education, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
University of Cincinnati Evaluation Services Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 2024 Jun;73(3-4):360-377. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12723. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
School-based law enforcement (SBLE) have become increasingly common in U.S. schools over recent decades despite the controversy surrounding their presence and lack of consensus around their associated benefits and harms. Drawing on the history and evidence base regarding SBLE, we advocate for an end to SBLE programs. Grounding our argument in principles of Community Psychology and positive youth development, we outline how the presence and actions of SBLE negatively affect individual students as well as school systems, with particularly harmful outcomes for students with minoritized and marginalized identities. Research on SBLE and school crime does not provide consistent evidence of positive impacts, and many studies find null effects for the relationship between SBLE and school crime or increases in crime and violence in schools. Though funding for SBLE is often prompted by high-profile acts of gun violence in schools, evidence suggests that SBLE neither prevents these incidents, nor lessens the severity when they do occur. Thus, we advocate for removing law enforcement from school settings and redirecting resources into inclusive, evidence-informed responses that are generally safer and more effective than SBLE. We close by outlining the policy landscape governing SBLE programs and ways communities can lobby for change.
尽管美国学校的执法(SBLE)存在争议,且其相关的利益和危害也缺乏共识,但近几十年来,SBLE 在美学校中已变得越来越普遍。本文借鉴了 SBLE 的历史和证据基础,倡导结束 SBLE 项目。我们以社区心理学和青少年积极发展的原则为依据,阐述了 SBLE 的存在和行动如何对个别学生以及学校系统产生负面影响,少数族裔和边缘化身份的学生尤其会受到不利影响。对 SBLE 和学校犯罪的研究并未提供积极影响的一致证据,许多研究发现 SBLE 与学校犯罪之间的关系或学校犯罪和暴力的增加没有任何影响。尽管 SBLE 的资金通常是由学校中发生的引人注目的枪支暴力事件引发的,但有证据表明,SBLE 既不能预防这些事件,也不能减轻事件发生时的严重程度。因此,我们倡导将执法从学校环境中移除,并将资源重新用于包容性、基于证据的应对措施,这些措施通常比 SBLE 更安全、更有效。最后,我们概述了管理 SBLE 项目的政策环境以及社区可以争取变革的方式。