• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

碳排放交易能否改善碳排放绩效?来自中国准自然实验的证据。

Can carbon emission trading improve carbon emission performance? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China.

机构信息

College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, China.

College of Economic and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(59):124028-124040. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31060-z. Epub 2023 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-023-31060-z
PMID:37995033
Abstract

Carbon emission trading policies play a key role in reducing carbon emissions through market-based mechanisms. In the context of China's carbon neutrality goals and carbon peaking targets, it is important to predict and evaluate the effectiveness of such policies. The combined impact of carbon trading policies on carbon emission reduction and economic output has not been well investigated in previous studies. In this study, the impact of carbon emission trading policies on regional carbon emission performance was assessed through mechanism analysis and empirical tests. The mechanism analysis showed that carbon emission intensity reduction relied on three mediating effects: technological innovation incentives, industrial structure optimization, and energy substitution. For the empirical test, the multi-time difference-in-differences (DID) method was adopted to study the impact using panel data from 30 provinces in China between 2005 and 2019. Moreover, the specific impact mechanism was further tested using mediating effects. The results showed that China's carbon trading policy has significantly affected the carbon emission performance of the pilot regions, and factors such as GDP per capita, urbanization level, and capital-labor ratio have notably contributed to the reduction of carbon emission intensity. The proportions of the three mediating effects in the total effect were estimated to be 60.98%, 23.17%, and 10.14%, respectively. This study provides an empirical approach to the study of the impact of carbon trading policy on carbon emission reduction and economic output and can serve as a reference for addressing climate change and alleviating conflicts between the environment and economic growth in similar regions.

摘要

碳排放交易政策通过市场机制在减少碳排放方面发挥着关键作用。在中国实现碳中和目标和碳峰值目标的背景下,预测和评估这些政策的有效性非常重要。在之前的研究中,碳交易政策对减排和经济产出的综合影响尚未得到很好的研究。本研究通过机制分析和实证检验评估了碳排放交易政策对区域碳排放绩效的影响。机制分析表明,碳排放量减少依赖于三种中介效应:技术创新激励、产业结构优化和能源替代。对于实证检验,采用多期差分法(DID)使用中国 2005 年至 2019 年的 30 个省份的面板数据进行了研究。此外,还通过中介效应进一步测试了具体影响机制。结果表明,中国的碳交易政策显著影响了试点地区的碳排放绩效,人均 GDP、城市化水平和资本劳动比率等因素对碳强度的降低有显著贡献。三种中介效应在总效应中的比例分别估计为 60.98%、23.17%和 10.14%。本研究为研究碳交易政策对减排和经济产出的影响提供了一种实证方法,可为类似地区应对气候变化和缓解环境与经济增长之间的冲突提供参考。

相似文献

1
Can carbon emission trading improve carbon emission performance? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China.碳排放交易能否改善碳排放绩效?来自中国准自然实验的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(59):124028-124040. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31060-z. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
2
Evaluation of carbon emission reduction effect and porter effect of China's carbon trading policy.中国碳交易政策的碳排放减少效应与波特效应评估
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(16):46527-46546. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25593-6. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
3
Study of the Impact of Industrial Restructuring on the Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Carbon Emission Intensity in Chinese Provinces-Analysis of Mediating Effects Based on Technological Innovation.基于技术创新的中介效应分析:产业结构调整对中国省份碳排放强度时空演变的影响研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 17;19(20):13401. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013401.
4
Market incentives, carbon quota allocation and carbon emission reduction: Evidence from China's carbon trading pilot policy.市场激励、碳配额分配与碳排放减排:来自中国碳交易试点政策的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Oct 1;319:115650. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115650. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
5
Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China's Pilot Emission Trading Scheme.排放交易是否能提高碳生产力?来自中国试点排放交易计划的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 30;17(15):5522. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155522.
6
Impact on Carbon Intensity of Carbon Emission Trading-Evidence from a Pilot Program in 281 Cities in China.中国 281 个城市碳交易试点对碳强度的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 30;19(19):12483. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912483.
7
Urban carbon emission intensity under emission trading system in a developing economy: evidence from 273 Chinese cities.发展中经济体排放交易体系下的城市碳排放强度:来自中国 273 个城市的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(5):5168-5179. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10785-1. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
8
Does the low carbon transition impact urban resilience? Evidence from China's pilot cities for carbon emission trading.低碳转型是否会影响城市韧性?来自中国碳排放交易试点城市的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):11128-11149. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-31903-3. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
9
The effects of carbon trading on resident income: a theoretical and empirical study on the pilot carbon market in China.碳排放交易对居民收入的影响:基于中国碳市场试点的理论与实证研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(59):123843-123861. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30903-z. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
10
The Energy Saving and Emission Reduction Effect of Carbon Trading Pilot Policy in China: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment.中国碳交易试点政策的节能减排效果:基于准自然实验的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;19(15):9272. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159272.