• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国新区域性创伤中心实施的绩效改进和患者安全计划效果评估。

An Evaluation of the Effect of Performance Improvement and Patient Safety Program Implemented in a New Regional Trauma Center of Korea.

机构信息

Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.

Gyeonggi South Regional Trauma Center, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Jun 7;36(22):e149. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e149.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e149
PMID:34100561
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8185120/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study examined the impact of the performance improvement and patient safety (PIPS) program implemented in 2015 on outcomes for trauma patients in a regional trauma center established by a government-led project for a national trauma system in Korea.

METHODS

The PIPS program was based on guidelines by the World Health Organization and American College of Surgeons. The corrective strategies were proceeded according to the loop closure principle: data-gathering and monitoring, identification of preventable trauma deaths (PTDs), evaluation of preventable factors, analysis of findings, and corrective action plans. We established guidelines and protocols for trauma care, conducted targeted education and peer review presentations for problematic cases, and enhanced resources for improvement accordingly. A comparative analysis was performed on trauma outcomes over a four-year period (2015-2018) since implementing the PIPS program, including the number of trauma team activation and admissions, time factors related to resuscitation, ventilator duration, and the rate of PTDs.

RESULTS

Human resources in the center significantly increased during the period; attending surgeons responsible for trauma resuscitation from 6 to 11 and trauma nurses from 85 to 218. Trauma admissions (from 2,166 to 2,786), trauma team activations (from 373 to 1,688), and severe cases (from 22.6 to 33.8%) significantly increased (all < 0.001). Time to initial resuscitation and transfusion significantly decreased from 120 to 36 minutes ( < 0.001) and from 39 to 16 minutes ( < 0.001). Time to surgery for hemorrhage control and decompressive craniotomy improved from 99 to 54 minutes ( < 0.001) and 181 to 135 minutes ( = 0.042). Ventilator duration and rate of PTDs significantly decreased from 6 to 4 days ( = 0.001) and 22.2% to 8.4% ( = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the PIPS program resulted in improvements in outcomes at a regional trauma center that has just been opened in Korea. Further establishment of the PIPS program is required for optimal care of trauma patients.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨 2015 年实施的绩效改进和患者安全(PIPS)计划对韩国一个由政府主导的国家创伤系统项目设立的区域创伤中心创伤患者结局的影响。

方法

PIPS 计划基于世界卫生组织和美国外科医师学会的指南。纠正策略按照循环闭合原则进行:数据收集和监测、确定可预防的创伤死亡(PTD)、评估可预防因素、分析结果和制定纠正行动计划。我们为创伤救治制定了指南和方案,对有问题的病例进行了针对性的教育和同行评审演示,并相应地加强了改进资源。对实施 PIPS 计划后的四年期间(2015-2018 年)的创伤结局进行了比较分析,包括创伤团队激活和入院人数、复苏相关时间因素、呼吸机使用时间和 PTD 发生率。

结果

该中心的人力资源在该期间显著增加;负责创伤复苏的主治外科医生从 6 人增加到 11 人,创伤护士从 85 人增加到 218 人。创伤入院人数(从 2166 人增加到 2786 人)、创伤团队激活人数(从 373 人增加到 1688 人)和严重病例比例(从 22.6%增加到 33.8%)均显著增加(均 <0.001)。初始复苏和输血的时间分别从 120 分钟减少到 36 分钟(<0.001)和从 39 分钟减少到 16 分钟(<0.001)。控制出血和减压性颅骨切开术的手术时间从 99 分钟改善至 54 分钟(<0.001)和从 181 分钟改善至 135 分钟(=0.042)。呼吸机使用时间和 PTD 发生率分别从 6 天减少至 4 天(=0.001)和从 22.2%减少至 8.4%(=0.008)。

结论

在韩国刚刚开设的区域创伤中心实施 PIPS 计划后,创伤患者结局得到改善。需要进一步建立 PIPS 计划,以优化创伤患者的救治。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccde/8185120/d9ccdfbaa6fa/jkms-36-e149-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccde/8185120/2482552544fe/jkms-36-e149-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccde/8185120/d9ccdfbaa6fa/jkms-36-e149-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccde/8185120/2482552544fe/jkms-36-e149-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccde/8185120/d9ccdfbaa6fa/jkms-36-e149-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
An Evaluation of the Effect of Performance Improvement and Patient Safety Program Implemented in a New Regional Trauma Center of Korea.韩国新区域性创伤中心实施的绩效改进和患者安全计划效果评估。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Jun 7;36(22):e149. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e149.
2
American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma Performance Improvement and Patient Safety program: maximal impact in a mature trauma center.美国外科医师学会创伤绩效改进与患者安全委员会项目:在成熟创伤中心的最大影响
J Trauma. 2011 Nov;71(5):1447-53; discussion 1453-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182325d32.
3
Trauma faculty and trauma team activation: impact on trauma system function and patient outcome.创伤科医护人员与创伤团队启动:对创伤系统功能及患者预后的影响
J Trauma. 1999 Sep;47(3):576-81. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199909000-00028.
4
The Genesis of a Trauma Performance Improvement Plan.创伤绩效改进计划的起源
J Trauma Nurs. 2015 Nov-Dec;22(6):315-20. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000166.
5
Core Team Members' Impact on Outcomes and Process Improvement in the Initial Resuscitation of Trauma Patients.核心团队成员对创伤患者初始复苏结局及流程改进的影响
J Trauma Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;23(2):83-8; quiz E3-4. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000191.
6
Trauma performance improvement and patient safety committee: fostering an effective team.创伤绩效改进与患者安全委员会:打造高效团队。
J Trauma Nurs. 2011 Oct-Dec;18(4):213-20. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0b013e31823a454f.
7
Closed-Loop Communication Improves Task Completion in Pediatric Trauma Resuscitation.闭环通信可提高儿科创伤复苏中的任务完成率。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Jan-Feb;75(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.06.025. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
8
Using a multidisciplinary and evidence-based approach to decrease undertriage and overtriage of pediatric trauma patients.采用多学科且基于证据的方法,以减少儿科创伤患者的分诊不足和过度分诊情况。
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Sep;51(9):1518-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
9
The effect of dead-on-arrival and emergency department death classification on risk-adjusted performance in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program.死亡即入院和急诊科死亡分类对美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进计划中风险调整绩效的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Nov;73(5):1086-91; discussion 1091-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31826fc7a0.
10
Learning from 2523 trauma deaths in India- opportunities to prevent in-hospital deaths.从印度2523例创伤死亡病例中吸取经验——预防院内死亡的机会
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 16;17(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2085-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Right patient to the right place: the impact of a 6-year regional trauma centre-led prehospital education programme on EMS triage and patient outcomes.将合适的患者送往合适的地方:一项由区域创伤中心主导的为期6年的院前教育项目对急救医疗服务分诊及患者结局的影响。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Aug 20;25(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01321-w.
2
State of orthopaedic trauma registries in South Korea, Japan, and Australia.韩国、日本和澳大利亚的骨科创伤登记现状。
OTA Int. 2025 Aug 12;8(4 Suppl):e383. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000383. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Quality of pediatric trauma care: development of an age-adjusted TRISS model and survival benchmarking in a major trauma center.

本文引用的文献

1
Timing and Associated Factors for Sepsis-3 in Severe Trauma Patients: A 3-Year Single Trauma Center Experience.严重创伤患者中脓毒症3的发生时间及相关因素:一项为期3年的单创伤中心经验
Acute Crit Care. 2018 Aug;33(3):130-134. doi: 10.4266/acc.2018.00122. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
2
Preventable Trauma Death Rate after Establishing a National Trauma System in Korea.韩国建立国家创伤系统后可预防创伤死亡率。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Feb 22;34(8):e65. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e65. eCollection 2019 Mar 4.
3
Sign of Life is Associated with Return of Spontaneous Circulation After Resuscitative Thoracotomy: Single Trauma Center Experience of Republic of Korea.
儿童创伤护理质量:在一家大型创伤中心开发年龄调整后的TRISS模型及生存基准评估
Front Pediatr. 2024 Dec 12;12:1481467. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1481467. eCollection 2024.
4
Intentionally self-injured patients have lower mortality when treated at trauma centers versus non-trauma centers in South Korea.在韩国,故意自残患者在创伤中心接受治疗时的死亡率低于在非创伤中心接受治疗时的死亡率。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 May 20;9(1):e001258. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001258. eCollection 2024.
5
[Indicators to measure the performance of emergency trauma care].[衡量急诊创伤护理绩效的指标]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Nov 6;61(6):819-840. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10064412.
6
Comparison of Preventable Trauma Death Rates in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Before and After the Establishment of Regional Trauma Center: A Single Center Experience.区域创伤中心建立前后创伤性脑损伤患者可预防创伤死亡率的比较:单中心经验
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2023 May 26;19(2):227-233. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e16. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
National Follow-up Survey of Preventable Trauma Death Rate in Korea.韩国可预防创伤死亡率的全国随访调查。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Dec 26;37(50):e349. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e349.
8
A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of In-Hospital Mortality between Dedicated Regional Trauma Centers and Emergency Medical Centers in the Republic of Korea.韩国专用区域创伤中心与急诊医疗中心住院死亡率的倾向评分匹配比较
Emerg Med Int. 2022 Nov 16;2022:5749993. doi: 10.1155/2022/5749993. eCollection 2022.
9
Survival benefit of direct transport to trauma centers among patients with unintentional injuries in Korea: a propensity score-matched analysis.韩国意外伤害患者直接转运至创伤中心的生存获益:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2023 Mar;10(1):37-43. doi: 10.15441/ceem.22.318. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
10
Effect of Quality Control Program in Surgical Management of Early Cervical Cancer.质量控制方案对早期宫颈癌外科治疗的影响。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Nov 22;36(45):e316. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e316.
有生命迹象与抢救性开胸术后自主循环恢复相关:来自韩国某单一创伤中心的经验
World J Surg. 2019 Jun;43(6):1519-1524. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-04939-7.
4
Analyses of clinical outcomes after severe pelvic fractures: an international study.严重骨盆骨折后临床结局分析:一项国际研究。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018 Nov 21;3(1):e000238. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000238. eCollection 2018.
5
Efficacy of Uncross-Matched Type O Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion to Traumatic Shock Patients: a Propensity Score Match Study.未交叉配型 O 型红细胞输注对创伤性休克患者的疗效:倾向评分匹配研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Dec;32(12):2058-2063. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.12.2058.
6
Guidelines for Field Triage of Injured Patients: In conjunction with the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report published by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention.《伤员现场分类指南:与疾病预防控制中心发布的发病率和死亡率周报合作》。
West J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;14(1):69-76. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.1.15981.
7
Quality of Care Within a Trauma Center Is not Altered by Injury Type.创伤中心的医疗质量不会因损伤类型而改变。
J Trauma. 2010 Mar;68(3):716-20. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a7bec0.
8
A major trauma centre is a specialty hospital not a hospital of specialties.大型创伤中心是专科医院,而非专科综合医院。
Br J Surg. 2010 Jan;97(1):109-17. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6806.
9
Preparation and achievement of American College of Surgeons level I trauma verification raises hospital performance and improves patient outcome.美国外科医师学会一级创伤认证的准备与达成提升了医院绩效并改善了患者预后。
J Trauma. 2001 Aug;51(2):294-9; discussion 299-300. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200108000-00011.