• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

形式效应。

The formality effect.

机构信息

Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Department of Economics, Mathematics and Statistics, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Feb;8(2):300-310. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01761-z. Epub 2023 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1038/s41562-023-01761-z
PMID:37996499
Abstract

This paper documents the existence of a 'formality effect' in government communications. Across three online studies and three field experiments in different policy contexts (total N = 67,632), we show that, contrary to researcher and practitioner predictions, formal government communications are more effective at influencing resident behaviour than informal government communications. In exploring mechanisms, we show that formality operates as a heuristic for credibility and importance. Recipients view the source of a formal letter as more competent and trustworthy, and view the request itself as more important to take action on, despite no evidence of change in comprehension or in perceived ease of taking action. These findings have immediate implications for government communicators and open the door for a renewed focus on how the design and presentation of information impacts behaviour.

摘要

本文记录了政府沟通中存在的“形式效应”。通过三个不同政策背景下的在线研究和三个现场实验(总计 N=67632),我们表明,与研究人员和从业者的预测相反,正式的政府沟通在影响居民行为方面比非正式的政府沟通更有效。在探索机制的过程中,我们表明形式主义是一种可信度和重要性的启发式。收件人认为正式信件的来源更有能力和值得信赖,并且认为请求本身更重要,需要采取行动,尽管没有证据表明理解或采取行动的容易程度有所改变。这些发现对政府沟通者具有直接的意义,并为重新关注信息的设计和呈现方式如何影响行为开辟了道路。

相似文献

1
The formality effect.形式效应。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Feb;8(2):300-310. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01761-z. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
2
Citizen journalism reduces the credibility deficit of authoritarian government in risk communication amid COVID-19 outbreaks.公民新闻降低了在 COVID-19 疫情爆发期间威权政府在风险沟通中的可信度赤字。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 8;16(12):e0260961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260961. eCollection 2021.
3
Formal versus informal interventions for challenging behaviour in persons with intellectual disabilities.针对智障人士挑战性行为的正式干预与非正式干预
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2004 Jan;48(1):60-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2004.00578.x.
4
Who is a credible source of preventive advice? An experimental vignette study of general public attitudes towards role expansion in health and social care.谁是可信的预防建议来源?公众对健康和社会护理中角色扩展的态度的实验案例研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2021 Feb;26(1):198-213. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12464. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
5
Adaptation to climate change: A study on regional climate change adaptation policy and practice framework.适应气候变化:区域气候变化适应政策与实践框架研究
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jun 15;336:117666. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117666. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
6
Communications in the time of a pandemic: the readability of documents for public consumption.大流行时期的传播:面向公众的文件易读性。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2021 Apr;45(2):116-121. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13066. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
7
Health risks and informal employment in South Africa: does formality protect health?南非的健康风险与非正规就业:正规化能保障健康吗?
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2015 Jul-Sep;21(3):207-15. doi: 10.1179/2049396714Y.0000000066. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
8
Formality of the Chinese collective leadership.中国集体领导的形式。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):922-35. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0775-4.
9
How Experts' Use of Medical Technical Jargon in Different Types of Online Health Forums Affects Perceived Information Credibility: Randomized Experiment With Laypersons.专家在不同类型在线健康论坛中使用医学技术术语如何影响信息可信度认知:针对非专业人士的随机实验
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 23;20(1):e30. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8346.
10
Changing the culture: a qualitative study exploring research capacity in local government.改变文化:一项探索地方政府研究能力的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 14;22(1):1341. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13758-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting User Engagement in Health Misinformation Correction on Social Media Platforms in Taiwan: Content Analysis and Text Mining Study.预测台湾社交媒体平台上健康错误信息纠正中的用户参与度:内容分析与文本挖掘研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 23;27:e65631. doi: 10.2196/65631.
2
The effects of short messages encouraging prevention behaviors early in the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情早期鼓励预防行为的短信效果。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 14;18(4):e0284354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284354. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Behavioural nudges increase COVID-19 vaccinations.行为推动可增加 COVID-19 疫苗接种率。
Nature. 2021 Sep;597(7876):404-409. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03843-2. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
2
Using implementation intentions prompts to enhance influenza vaccination rates.使用实施意向提示来提高流感疫苗接种率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 28;108(26):10415-20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103170108. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
3
Do you have a voting plan?: implementation intentions, voter turnout, and organic plan making.你有投票计划吗?:实施意图、投票率和有机计划制定。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Feb;21(2):194-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797609359326. Epub 2010 Jan 8.