Department of Neurosciences, Division of Ophthalmology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Cytology Unit, National Health Laboratory Service and Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Eye (Lond). 2024 Apr;38(6):1118-1124. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02833-0. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
The aim of the study is to assess non-invasive diagnostic modalities for ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) when compared to histology.
A prospective case-control study was conducted of patients presenting with conjunctival masses at a tertiary eye hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. Patients completed an interview and had three non-invasive diagnostic tests: optical coherence tomography, impression cytology and methylene blue stain. A biopsy with histology was performed as the gold standard to confirm the diagnosis.
One hundred and eighty-two conjunctival masses of 175 patients were evaluated. There were 135 lesions identified as OSSN on biopsy and 47 lesions were benign on histology. Optical coherence tomography had a sensitivity and specificity of 87.2% (95% CI: 80.0-92.5) and 75.6% (95% CI: 60.5-87.1), respectively, when an epithelial thickness cutoff of 140 um was used. Shadowing was found in 46% of cases due to leukoplakia or increased thickness of the mass. Cytology had a sensitivity of 72.4% (95% CI: 62.5-81.0) and a specificity of 74.3% (95% CI: 56.7-87.5). Twenty-seven per cent of cytology specimens were excluded from analysis due to inadequate cellularity. Methylene blue had a high sensitivity of 91.9% (95% CI: 85.9-95.9), but low specificity of 55.3% (95% CI: 40.1-69.8).
Optical coherence tomography had a high sensitivity and specificity as a non-invasive test and liquid-based cytology performed well but had a lower sensitivity and specificity than with optical coherence tomography. Methylene blue performed well as a screening test, with a high sensitivity but low specificity.
本研究旨在评估与组织病理学相比,各种非侵入性诊断方法在眼表鳞状上皮肿瘤(OSSN)中的诊断价值。
这是一项在南非约翰内斯堡的一家三级眼科医院进行的前瞻性病例对照研究。患者完成了一份访谈,并接受了三种非侵入性诊断测试:光学相干断层扫描、印迹细胞学和亚甲蓝染色。活检和组织病理学检查被用作金标准来确认诊断。
共评估了 175 名患者的 182 个结膜肿块。活检显示 135 个病变为 OSSN,47 个病变为良性组织病理学。当使用上皮厚度 140μm 的截断值时,光学相干断层扫描的敏感性和特异性分别为 87.2%(95%CI:80.0-92.5)和 75.6%(95%CI:60.5-87.1)。46%的病例因白斑病或肿块厚度增加而出现阴影。细胞学的敏感性为 72.4%(95%CI:62.5-81.0),特异性为 74.3%(95%CI:56.7-87.5)。由于细胞数量不足,27%的细胞学标本被排除在分析之外。亚甲蓝的敏感性为 91.9%(95%CI:85.9-95.9),但特异性仅为 55.3%(95%CI:40.1-69.8)。
光学相干断层扫描作为一种非侵入性检查方法具有较高的敏感性和特异性,液基细胞学检查也具有良好的性能,但敏感性和特异性均低于光学相干断层扫描。亚甲蓝作为一种筛查试验具有较高的敏感性,但特异性较低。