Department of Neonatology, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University/Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2024 Jan;100(1):36-49. doi: 10.1111/cen.14995. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
In recent years, a series of clinical guidelines on neonatal hypoglycemia have been developed in different countries and regions. This systematic review was aimed at providing evidence for clinical decision-making and providing ideas for future research by comparatively analyzing the contents of various guidelines.
A multilateral approach was used, including comprehensive literature searches and online research. The retrieved studies were screened by two independent reviewers according to our inclusion criteria. The two reviewers independently extracted the descriptive data. Four appraisers assessed the guidelines using the AGREE-II instrument.
Ten clinical guidelines on neonatal hypoglycemia were included, with a mean score of 45.28%-83.45% in six domains. The guidelines are relatively consistent in their recommendations on clinical symptoms of neonatal hypoglycemia, but different in risk factors, preventive measures, thresholds for clinical management of hypoglycemia, target glucose ranges for its control, and pharmacotherapy.
By summarising the recommendations in the guidelines on neonatal hypoglycemia, we found that blood glucose values were not the only observational indicator, and other indicators (e.g., ketone bodies, lactate) related to glucose metabolism should also be considered for a comprehensive assessment. There is still a lack of consensus on thresholds for the clinical management of hypoglycemia and target glucose ranges for its control, and the recommendations on its pharmacotherapy are rather simple and sketchy. In the future, more high-quality studies are required to further improve the early identification of neonatal hypoglycemia and intervention strategies against it.
近年来,不同国家和地区相继制定了一系列新生儿低血糖临床指南。本系统评价旨在通过比较分析各指南的内容,为临床决策提供证据,并为未来的研究提供思路。
采用多边方法,包括全面的文献检索和在线研究。根据纳入标准,由两名独立的综述作者筛选检索到的研究。两名综述作者独立提取描述性数据。四位评估员使用 AGREE-II 工具对指南进行评估。
共纳入 10 篇新生儿低血糖临床指南,6 个领域的平均得分在 45.28%-83.45%之间。这些指南在新生儿低血糖的临床症状推荐方面相对一致,但在危险因素、预防措施、低血糖临床管理的阈值、控制目标血糖范围和药物治疗方面存在差异。
通过总结新生儿低血糖指南中的推荐意见,我们发现血糖值并不是唯一的观察指标,还应考虑与葡萄糖代谢相关的其他指标(如酮体、乳酸)进行综合评估。对于低血糖的临床管理阈值和控制目标血糖范围仍缺乏共识,药物治疗的推荐意见较为简单和粗略。未来需要更多高质量的研究来进一步改善新生儿低血糖的早期识别和干预策略。