FISPPA Department, University of Padova, Via Venezia 14, 35131 Padova, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 12;20(22):7056. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20227056.
Residents of an extensive area of the Veneto Region (Italy) face one of the largest technological disasters due to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). On the basis of a risk gradient of contamination, the affected territories were divided into 4 areas: Red (of maximum exposure, where a human biomonitoring programme (HBM) was activated), Orange, Yellow, and Green. This article presents a case study of residents who live in the Orange Area, the second area in terms of contamination, excluded from the HBM. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 residents engaged in promoting a legal procedure to exercise their right to know. Grounded theory and a thematic analysis method were used. Overall, the findings revealed that experiencing contamination causes a negative psychosocial impact on the residents' lives; difficulty accessing information; living with uncertainty, caused by the lack of institutional and health support and medical consultation; a sense of abandonment; difficulty managing preventive and protective actions; and the deterioration of relationships, on the basis of the social comparison with residents of the Red Area, to whom HBM was granted and where the concept of health ostracism has emerged. This study demonstrated that biomonitoring may help reduce discomfort in the case of contamination by informing people of their chemical exposure.
意大利威尼托地区(Veneto Region)大片地区的居民正面临着由于全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)而导致的最大技术灾难之一。根据污染程度的风险梯度,受影响的地区被分为 4 个区域:红色(最高暴露区,在此启动了人体生物监测计划(HBM))、橙色、黄色和绿色。本文介绍了居住在橙色区域(污染程度排名第二,未被纳入 HBM)的居民的案例研究。对参与推动法律程序以行使知情权的 17 名居民进行了半结构化访谈。采用扎根理论和主题分析方法。总的来说,研究结果表明,污染经历对居民的生活造成了负面影响,导致了心理社会压力;难以获取信息;由于缺乏机构和健康支持以及医疗咨询,生活在不确定之中;感到被抛弃;难以采取预防和保护措施;以及由于与获得 HBM 的红色区域的居民进行社会比较,出现了健康排斥的概念,从而导致人际关系恶化。这项研究表明,生物监测可能有助于减轻污染带来的不适,因为它可以告知人们其化学暴露情况。