• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高架栽培中农药暴露生物监测研究的批判性范围综述

A Critical Scoping Review of Pesticide Exposure Biomonitoring Studies in Overhead Cultures.

作者信息

Willenbockel Christian Tobias, Prinz Julia, Dietrich Stefan, Marx-Stoelting Philip, Weikert Cornelia, Tralau Tewes, Niemann Lars

机构信息

Department for Pesticide Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.

Department for Food Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Toxics. 2022 Mar 31;10(4):170. doi: 10.3390/toxics10040170.

DOI:10.3390/toxics10040170
PMID:35448431
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9030759/
Abstract

The exposure of operators, workers, residents and bystanders to pesticides is of high potential concern. Yet, reports on pesticide residues in the environment and near treated fields often spark debates if such findings might indicate a health risk. Although the underlying models are considered conservative, there are only limited field data on systemic exposure available. As a first step to improve the situation, we conducted a scoping review of state-of-the-art pesticide exposure biomonitoring studies in operators, workers, residents or bystanders. In contrast to existing reviews, we focused on target cultures of potential high pesticide exposure such as tree-grown produce, vine or hops. The search was conducted in Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed. Out of 17 eligible articles, a total of 11 studies met our search criteria, and 6 of them quantified the systemic exposure of humans. The analysis revealed that exposure was mainly driven by application of pesticides and reentry work, resulting in a higher exposure of operators and workers than of residents and bystanders. In nearly all cases, the systemic exposure was below the relevant toxicological reference values. The studies were subsequently analyzed to identify key criteria for a reliable design of a biomonitoring study on pesticide exposure.

摘要

操作人员、工人、居民和旁观者接触农药的情况备受关注。然而,关于环境中以及施药农田附近农药残留的报告,一旦这些发现可能暗示健康风险,往往会引发争议。尽管基础模型被认为是保守的,但关于全身暴露的现场数据却十分有限。作为改善这种情况的第一步,我们对操作人员、工人、居民或旁观者中最先进的农药暴露生物监测研究进行了范围综述。与现有综述不同的是,我们关注的是农药潜在高暴露的目标作物,如树上生长的农产品、葡萄或啤酒花。检索在科学网、Scopus和PubMed中进行。在17篇符合条件的文章中,共有11项研究符合我们的检索标准,其中6项对人体的全身暴露进行了量化。分析表明,暴露主要是由农药施用和再次进入作业引起的,导致操作人员和工人的暴露程度高于居民和旁观者。几乎在所有情况下,全身暴露都低于相关的毒理学参考值。随后对这些研究进行分析,以确定农药暴露生物监测研究可靠设计的关键标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30f5/9030759/7e074998a76e/toxics-10-00170-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30f5/9030759/7e074998a76e/toxics-10-00170-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30f5/9030759/7e074998a76e/toxics-10-00170-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A Critical Scoping Review of Pesticide Exposure Biomonitoring Studies in Overhead Cultures.高架栽培中农药暴露生物监测研究的批判性范围综述
Toxics. 2022 Mar 31;10(4):170. doi: 10.3390/toxics10040170.
2
Addressing bystander exposure to agricultural pesticides in life cycle impact assessment.在生命周期影响评估中解决旁观者接触农业农药问题。
Chemosphere. 2018 Apr;197:541-549. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.01.088.
3
Perceptions of pesticides exposure risks by operators, workers, residents and bystanders in Greece, Italy and the UK.希腊、意大利和英国的经营者、工人、居民和旁观者对农药接触风险的看法。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Feb 1;505:1082-92. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.099. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
4
Modelling human health risks from pesticide use in innovative legume-cereal intercropping systems in Mediterranean conditions.模拟地中海条件下创新豆科-谷类间作系统中农药使用对人类健康的风险。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022 Jun 15;238:113590. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113590. Epub 2022 May 5.
5
Pesticide risk perceptions among bystanders of aerial spraying on bananas in Costa Rica.哥斯达黎加香蕉园空中喷雾旁旁观者对农药风险的认知。
Environ Res. 2020 Oct;189:109877. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109877. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
6
Dietary glycation compounds - implications for human health.饮食糖化化合物 - 对人类健康的影响。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2024 Sep;54(8):485-617. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2362985. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
7
Are encapsulated pesticides less harmful to human health than their conventional alternatives? Protocol for a systematic review of in vitro and in vivo animal model studies.与传统替代品相比,封装农药对人类健康的危害更小吗?体外和体内动物模型研究的系统评价方案。
Environ Int. 2023 Apr;174:107924. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.107924. Epub 2023 Apr 9.
8
New Methodologies and Techniques for Biomonitoring Pesticide Exposure in Agricultural Workers: A Systematic Review.农业工人农药暴露生物监测的新方法和技术:一项系统综述
Toxics. 2025 Jan 28;13(2):104. doi: 10.3390/toxics13020104.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Determination of pesticide residues in urine by chromatography-mass spectrometry: methods and applications.色谱-质谱法测定尿中农药残留:方法与应用。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 12;12:1336014. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1336014. eCollection 2024.
2
Applicability of Food Monitoring Data for Assessing Relative Exposure Contributions of Pyrethroids in Retrospective Human Biomonitoring Risk Estimations.食品监测数据在回顾性人体生物监测风险评估中用于评估拟除虫菊酯相对暴露贡献的适用性。
Toxics. 2023 Dec 28;12(1):24. doi: 10.3390/toxics12010024.
3
Health and Psychological Concerns of Communities Affected by Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances: The Case of Residents Living in the Orange Area of the Veneto Region.

本文引用的文献

1
Toxicological Comparison of Mancozeb and Zoxamide Fungicides at Environmentally Relevant Concentrations by an In Vitro Approach.采用体外方法比较代森锰锌和唑酰草胺杀菌剂在环境相关浓度下的毒理学差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 14;18(16):8591. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168591.
2
Pesticide Exposure of Residents Living Close to Agricultural Fields in the Netherlands: Protocol for an Observational Study.荷兰靠近农田居民的农药暴露情况:一项观察性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Apr 28;10(4):e27883. doi: 10.2196/27883.
3
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance mancozeb.
受全氟和多氟烷基物质影响的社区的健康和心理问题:居住在威尼托地区橙色区域的居民的情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 12;20(22):7056. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20227056.
4
Regional Variations in Pesticide Residue Detection Rates and Concentrations in Saudi Arabian Crops.沙特阿拉伯农作物中农药残留检测率和浓度的区域差异
Toxics. 2023 Sep 21;11(9):798. doi: 10.3390/toxics11090798.
5
Editorial for the Special Issue on "Human Biomonitoring in Health Risk Assessment: Current Practices and Recommendations for the Future".“健康风险评估中的人体生物监测:当前实践与未来建议”特刊社论
Toxics. 2023 Feb 10;11(2):168. doi: 10.3390/toxics11020168.
活性成分代森锰锌农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2020 Dec 16;18(12):e05755. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5755. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
Determinants of non-dietary exposure to agricultural pesticides in populations living close to fields: A systematic review.居住在农田附近人群的非饮食性农业农药暴露的决定因素:系统评价。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Mar 20;761:143294. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143294. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
5
Evaluating imidacloprid exposure among grape field male workers using biological and environmental assessment tools: An exploratory study.利用生物和环境评估工具评估葡萄园男性工人的吡虫啉暴露情况:一项探索性研究。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020 Sep;230:113625. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113625. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
6
Scientific Opinion of the PPR Panel on the follow-up of the findings of the External Scientific Report 'Literature review of epidemiological studies linking exposure to pesticides and health effects'.动物健康与福利专家组关于《将接触农药与健康影响联系起来的流行病学研究文献综述》外部科学报告研究结果后续跟进的科学意见。
EFSA J. 2017 Oct 31;15(10):e05007. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5007. eCollection 2017 Oct.
7
Establishing health-based biological exposure limits for pesticides: A proof of principle study using mancozeb.制定基于健康的农药生物接触限值:以代森锰锌为例的原理验证研究。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Aug;115:104689. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104689. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
8
Assessment of residential exposures to agricultural pesticides: A scoping review.居住环境中农业用农药暴露评估:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0232258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232258. eCollection 2020.
9
Urine glyphosate level as a quantitative biomarker of oral exposure.尿中草甘膦水平作为口服暴露的定量生物标志物。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020 Jul;228:113526. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113526. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
10
Relationship between Organophosphate and Pyrethroid Insecticides in Blood and Their Metabolites in Urine: A Pilot Study.血液中有机磷和拟除虫菊酯杀虫剂及其代谢物的关系:一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 18;17(1):34. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010034.