• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Beyond the confidence interval.

作者信息

Poole C

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1987 Feb;77(2):195-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.2.195.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.77.2.195
PMID:3799860
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1646825/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Beyond the confidence interval.超出置信区间。
Am J Public Health. 1987 Feb;77(2):195-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.2.195.
2
Introduction to statistics--1. The confidence interval.统计学导论——1. 置信区间
Inj Prev. 1997 Sep;3(3):213. doi: 10.1136/ip.3.3.213.
3
On sample-size and power calculations for studies using confidence intervals.关于使用置信区间的研究的样本量和效能计算。
Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Jul;128(1):231-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114945.
4
Comparisons of confidence intervals for attributable risk.归因风险置信区间的比较。
Biometrics. 1981 Jun;37(2):293-302.
5
Statistical significance and confidence intervals.
Br J Clin Pract. 1988 Nov;42(11):465-8.
6
Epidemiology for nutritionists: 5. Some statistical aspects.
Hum Nutr Appl Nutr. 1984 Jun;38(3):215-22.
7
Breaking down P values and 95% confidence intervals: what infection preventionists should know about statistical certainty.
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Nov;41(11):1083-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.03.298. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
8
Commentary: reconciling theory and practice: what is to be done with p values?评论：调和理论与实践：如何处理P值？
Epidemiology. 2013 Mar;24(2):212-4. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318281e856.
9
Statistical criteria in the interpretation of epidemiologic data.流行病学数据解读中的统计学标准。
Am J Public Health. 1987 Feb;77(2):191-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.2.191.
10
Limitations of the logistic analysis of epidemiologic data.
Am J Epidemiol. 1979 Dec;110(6):693-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112849.

引用本文的文献

1
Alternative to the statistical mass confusion of testing for "no effect".替代对“无效应”进行检验时的统计大规模混淆。
J Cell Biol. 2025 Aug 4;224(8). doi: 10.1083/jcb.202403034. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
2
Alternative to the statistical mass confusion of testing for "no effect".用于检验“无效应”的统计学大规模混淆的替代方法。
ArXiv. 2025 May 12:arXiv:2407.07114v3.
3
Associations of prenatal urinary melamine, melamine analogues, and aromatic amines with gestational duration and fetal growth in the ECHO Cohort.ECHO队列中孕期尿中三聚氰胺、三聚氰胺类似物及芳香胺与孕期时长和胎儿生长的关联
Environ Int. 2025 Jan;195:109227. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.109227. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
4
Reporting and interpreting statistical results in veterinary medicine: Calling for change.兽医学中统计结果的报告与解读：呼吁变革。
J Vet Intern Med. 2025 Jan-Feb;39(1):e17258. doi: 10.1111/jvim.17258. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
5
P>0.05 Is Good: The NORD-h Protocol for Several Hypothesis Analysis Based on Known Risks, Costs, and Benefits.P>0.05 是有益的：基于已知风险、成本和效益的几种假设分析的NORD-h方案。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2024 Nov;57(6):511-520. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.24.250. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
6
Can algorithms replace expert knowledge for causal inference? A case study on novice use of causal discovery.算法能否取代专家知识进行因果推断？一项关于新手使用因果发现的案例研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 May 7;194(5):1399-1409. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae338.
7
Why Stating Hypotheses in Grant Applications Is Unnecessary.为何在基金申请中陈述假设并无必要。
JAMA. 2024 Jan 23;331(4):285-286. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.27163.
8
Why and how we should join the shift from significance testing to estimation.我们为何以及如何应该从显著性检验转向估计。
J Evol Biol. 2022 Jun;35(6):777-787. doi: 10.1111/jeb.14009. Epub 2022 May 18.
9
The reporting of values, confidence intervals and statistical significance in Preventive Veterinary Medicine (1997-2017).《预防兽医学》（1997 - 2017年）中数值、置信区间及统计学显著性的报告
PeerJ. 2021 Nov 24;9:e12453. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12453. eCollection 2021.
10
On Causal Inferences for Personalized Medicine: How Hidden Causal Assumptions Led to Erroneous Causal Claims About the D-Value.关于个性化医疗的因果推断：隐藏的因果假设如何导致关于D值的错误因果声明。
Am Stat. 2020;74(3):243-248. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2019.1575771. Epub 2019 May 20.

本文引用的文献

1
'Truth in packaging?' The unwrapping of epidemiologic research.“包装中的真相？”流行病学研究的剖析
J Occup Med. 1984 Aug;26(8):571-4.
2
Spermicide use and Down's syndrome.杀精剂的使用与唐氏综合征
Am J Public Health. 1982 Apr;72(4):399-401. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.4.399.
3
Asbestos exposure, smoking, and neoplasia.石棉暴露、吸烟与肿瘤形成。
JAMA. 1968 Apr 8;204(2):106-12.
4
Epidemiology of urinary tract infection: I. Diaphragm use and sexual intercourse.尿路感染的流行病学：I. 避孕隔膜的使用与性交
Am J Public Health. 1985 Nov;75(11):1308-13. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.11.1308.
5
Are there adverse effects of periconceptional spermicide use?受孕前使用杀精剂是否有不良影响？
Fertil Steril. 1985 Mar;43(3):442-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48446-3.
6
Science and policy making.科学与政策制定。
Am J Public Health. 1985 Apr;75(4):340-1. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.4.340.
7
Confidence intervals vs significance tests: quantitative interpretation.置信区间与显著性检验：定量解释
Am J Public Health. 1986 May;76(5):587-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.5.587.
8
Significance tests have a role in epidemiologic research: reactions to A. M. Walker.显著性检验在流行病学研究中的作用：对A.M.沃克的回应
Am J Public Health. 1986 May;76(5):559-60. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.5.559.
9
Reporting the results of epidemiologic studies.报告流行病学研究结果。
Am J Public Health. 1986 May;76(5):556-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.5.556.
10
Significance tests represent consensus and standard practice.显著性检验代表了共识和标准做法。
Am J Public Health. 1986 Aug;76(8):1033-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.8.1033.