Feenstra Ruth W, de Bruin Liese J E, van Heuvelen Marieke J G
Department of Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 196, 9700 AD Groningen, The Netherlands.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Nov 8;13(11):913. doi: 10.3390/bs13110913.
Physical activity (PA) has positive effects on the physical and cognitive functioning of people with dementia. Knowledge about what limits and stimulates people with dementia to participate in PA is essential to promote effective PA implementation and enhance PA levels. Previous reviews primarily included opinion-based studies, using data from interviews, focus groups or dyads. By including implementation studies, we aimed to elaborate on previous reviews by identifying new barriers to PA and new facilitators and motivators for PA. We conducted systematic searches in Pubmed, PsychInfo and Web of Science for studies published up to the 21st of September 2021. Search terms were related to the population of people with dementia, PA interventions and implementation outcomes. Studies were included if PA participation was investigated during actual PA implementation. No restrictions were made regarding study design, date of publication, PA type or outcome measures. Studies not implementing PA or not evaluating the implementation were excluded. Based on 13 empirical studies, we identified 35 barriers, 19 facilitators and 12 motivators. Of these, 21 barriers, 11 facilitators and 4 motivators were not identified by previous reviews. New factors are related to the support for people with dementia from informal and formal caregivers, e.g., revealing the importance of a trusting relationship. Furthermore, support for staff from the institution or an external party is needed to overcome doubts about PA, for example, related to safety and effects. New factors also suggested specific recommendations for the content and organization of the PA intervention, for instance, related to how to give instructions. Overall, factors affecting PA identified with opinion-based or implementation studies are complementary. Our extended overview shows the complexity of PA implementation and may help to personalize PA, develop implementation strategies, facilitate actual PA implementation and free up resources needed for effective implementation.
身体活动(PA)对痴呆症患者的身体和认知功能具有积极影响。了解限制和刺激痴呆症患者参与身体活动的因素对于促进有效的身体活动实施和提高身体活动水平至关重要。以往的综述主要包括基于观点的研究,使用来自访谈、焦点小组或二元组的数据。通过纳入实施研究,我们旨在通过识别身体活动的新障碍以及新的促进因素和动机来详细阐述以往的综述。我们在PubMed、PsychInfo和Web of Science中进行了系统检索,以查找截至2021年9月21日发表的研究。检索词与痴呆症患者群体、身体活动干预和实施结果相关。如果在实际身体活动实施过程中对身体活动参与情况进行了调查,则纳入该研究。对研究设计、发表日期、身体活动类型或结果测量没有限制。未实施身体活动或未评估实施情况的研究被排除。基于13项实证研究,我们识别出35个障碍、19个促进因素和12个动机。其中,21个障碍、11个促进因素和4个动机是以往综述未识别出的。新因素与非正式和正式护理人员对痴呆症患者的支持有关,例如,揭示了信任关系的重要性。此外,需要机构或外部方对工作人员提供支持,以消除对身体活动的疑虑,例如与安全性和效果相关的疑虑。新因素还针对身体活动干预的内容和组织提出了具体建议,例如,关于如何给予指导。总体而言,通过基于观点的研究或实施研究识别出的影响身体活动的因素是互补的。我们扩展后的概述显示了身体活动实施的复杂性,可能有助于使身体活动个性化、制定实施策略、促进实际身体活动实施并释放有效实施所需的资源。