• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我们通常会选择安全而非自由”:长期痴呆症护理专业护理人员的焦点小组结果。

''We usually choose safety over freedom'': results from focus groups with professional caregivers in long-term dementia care.

机构信息

Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), PO Box 1568, 3513 CR, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute (APH), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 20;22(1):677. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07952-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-022-07952-0
PMID:35596186
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9121585/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

People with dementia living in nursing homes are mostly sedentary, which is a consequence of various personal, environmental and organizational factors. Until now, studies on physical activity and safety in dementia have focused on residents and caregivers from the viewpoint of (individual) care provision and health benefits. There has been little to no focus on the possible influence of group dynamics between care providers with regard to physical activity and safety. The aim of this study is to gain more insight into the viewpoints and intentions of groups of professional caregivers towards safety and physical activity and the potential influence of the group-oriented setting in long-term care on physical activity of individual residents.

METHODS

A qualitative study comprising three focus group discussions including professional caregivers (n = 15) was conducted within two long-term care organizations in the Netherlands. Focus group discussions were structured using an interview guide derived from a preliminary framework, based on existing literature and complemented with clinical expertise.

RESULTS

Seven themes could be derived from the focus group discussions that influence physical activity and safety: 1) Individual health and abilities; 2) Balancing physical activity and safety; 3) Physical restraints; 4) Group interests versus the individual interests; 5) Organization of care and physical environment; 6) Perceived responsibilities and tasks of professional caregivers and 7) Change is challenging.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to multiple influencing factors, the balance for care providers in long-term care generally tends towards safety over physical activity. Furthermore, in order to stimulate physical activity various limitations are experienced, including the organization of care, the general health of the residents and difficulty to achieve changes in daily care. Most importantly, the group interests of both the professional caregivers and the residents have a substantial influence on the incorporation of physical activity in daily care.

摘要

背景

居住在养老院的痴呆症患者大多久坐不动,这是个人、环境和组织等多种因素共同作用的结果。迄今为止,有关痴呆症患者身体活动和安全的研究主要从(个人)护理提供和健康益处的角度关注居民和护理人员。几乎没有关注护理人员之间的群体动态对身体活动和安全的可能影响。本研究旨在更深入地了解专业护理人员群体对安全和身体活动的观点和意图,以及长期护理中以群体为导向的环境对个体居民身体活动的潜在影响。

方法

在荷兰的两个长期护理机构中进行了一项包括三个焦点小组讨论的定性研究,共纳入专业护理人员(n=15)。焦点小组讨论采用基于初步框架的访谈指南进行组织,该框架源自现有文献,并辅以临床专业知识。

结果

从焦点小组讨论中可以得出七个影响身体活动和安全的主题:1)个人健康和能力;2)平衡身体活动和安全;3)身体约束;4)群体利益与个人利益;5)护理组织和物理环境;6)专业护理人员的感知责任和任务;7)改变具有挑战性。

结论

由于多种影响因素,长期护理提供者的平衡普遍倾向于安全而非身体活动。此外,为了促进身体活动,他们面临着各种限制,包括护理组织、居民的整体健康状况以及难以在日常护理中实现改变。最重要的是,专业护理人员和居民的群体利益对将身体活动纳入日常护理有很大影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cd8/9121585/5c93d6451a77/12913_2022_7952_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cd8/9121585/5c93d6451a77/12913_2022_7952_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cd8/9121585/5c93d6451a77/12913_2022_7952_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
''We usually choose safety over freedom'': results from focus groups with professional caregivers in long-term dementia care.“我们通常会选择安全而非自由”:长期痴呆症护理专业护理人员的焦点小组结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 20;22(1):677. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07952-0.
2
Surveillance technology: an alternative to physical restraints? A qualitative study among professionals working in nursing homes for people with dementia.监测技术:替代身体约束的方法?一项针对痴呆症患者护理院专业人员的定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Feb;49(2):212-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.09.002. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
3
Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.改善老年护理机构中痴呆症患者护理中家庭与工作人员关系的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):52-63. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2415.
4
The best evidence for minimizing resistance-to-care during assisted personal care for older adults with dementia in nursing homes: a systematic review.养老院中为患有痴呆症的老年人提供协助性个人护理时将护理阻力降至最低的最佳证据:一项系统综述。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4622-4632. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-431.
5
Effectiveness of professional oral health care intervention on the oral health of residents with dementia in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review protocol.专业口腔保健干预对老年护理机构中痴呆症居民口腔健康的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):110-22. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2330.
6
How the interrelated physical, social and organizational environment impacts daily life of residents with dementia on a Green Care Farm.绿色关怀农场中相互关联的物理、社会和组织环境如何影响痴呆症居民的日常生活。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 29;10:946962. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.946962. eCollection 2022.
7
Professional caregivers' mental health problems and burnout in small-scale and traditional long term care settings for elderly people with dementia in the Netherlands and Belgium.专业照护者在荷兰和比利时小型传统老年痴呆长期护理环境中的心理健康问题和倦怠。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Jun;13(5):486.e7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Feb 11.
8
Physical Activity in People With Dementia Living in Long-Term Care Facilities and the Connection With Environmental Factors and Behavior.长期护理机构中痴呆症患者的身体活动与环境因素和行为的关系。
J Aging Phys Act. 2022 Aug 29;31(2):214-222. doi: 10.1123/japa.2021-0459. Print 2023 Apr 1.
9
Implementing a new living concept for persons with dementia in long-term care: evaluation of a quality improvement process.在长期护理中为痴呆症患者实施新的生活理念:质量改进过程的评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 7;24(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10765-y.
10
Family caregiver perspectives on social relations of elderly residents with dementia in small-scale versus traditional long-term care settings in the Netherlands and Belgium.家庭照顾者视角下的荷兰和比利时小规模与传统长期护理机构中痴呆老年人的社会关系。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Nov;21(21-22):3106-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04110.x. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Freedom of movement and health of nursing home residents with dementia: an exploratory cross-sectional study.痴呆症养老院居民的行动自由与健康:一项探索性横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Feb 22;25(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05774-3.
2
Informed Decision-Making with and for People with Dementia-Efficacy of the PRODECIDE Education Program for Legal Representatives: A Randomized Controlled Trial (PRODECIDE-RCT) and Process Evaluation.为痴呆症患者及其家属进行知情决策——PRODECIDE教育项目对法定代表人的效果:一项随机对照试验(PRODECIDE-RCT)及过程评估
Geriatrics (Basel). 2024 May 9;9(3):60. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics9030060.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Nursing assistants and resident satisfaction in long-term care: A systematic review.护理助理和长期护理中的居民满意度:系统评价。
Geriatr Nurs. 2021 Nov-Dec;42(6):1323-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.08.006. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
2
Individual and organizational factors of nurses' job satisfaction in long-term care: A systematic review.护士在长期护理中工作满意度的个体和组织因素:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Nov;123:104073. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104073. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
3
The relationship between quality and staffing in long-term care: A systematic review of the literature 2008-2020.
Implementing a new living concept for persons with dementia in long-term care: evaluation of a quality improvement process.
在长期护理中为痴呆症患者实施新的生活理念:质量改进过程的评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 7;24(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10765-y.
4
Association between freedom of movement and health of nursing home residents with dementia: an exploratory longitudinal study.行动自由与养老院痴呆症居民健康之间的关联:一项探索性纵向研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04677-z.
5
Factors Affecting Physical Activity in People with Dementia: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.影响痴呆症患者身体活动的因素:系统评价与叙述性综合分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Nov 8;13(11):913. doi: 10.3390/bs13110913.
长期护理中的质量与人员配备之间的关系:2008-2020 年文献的系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Oct;122:104036. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104036. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
4
Mapping the Social-Norms Literature: An Overview of Reviews.绘制社会规范文献图谱:综述概览
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Jan;15(1):62-80. doi: 10.1177/1745691619866455. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
5
Team inclusion and empowerment among nursing staff in long-term care.长期护理中护理人员的团队包容和赋权。
Geriatr Nurs. 2019 Sep-Oct;40(5):487-493. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
6
Does diverse staff and skill mix of teams impact quality of care in long-term elderly health care? An exploratory case study.团队中多样化的员工和技能组合会影响长期老年保健中的护理质量吗?一项探索性案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 20;18(1):988. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3812-4.
7
The Physical Environment of Nursing Homes for People with Dementia: Traditional Nursing Homes, Small-Scale Living Facilities, and Green Care Farms.为痴呆症患者提供护理的机构的物理环境:传统养老院、小型生活设施和绿色护理农场。
Healthcare (Basel). 2018 Nov 26;6(4):137. doi: 10.3390/healthcare6040137.
8
Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a residential aged care facility.老年护理机构中的身体活动与久坐行为
Australas J Ageing. 2019 Mar;38(1):E12-E18. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12589. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
9
Effects of Physical Activity in Nursing Home Residents with Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.体力活动对养老院痴呆患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2018;46(1-2):60-80. doi: 10.1159/000491818. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
10
Nurses' knowledge and attitudes about dementia care: Systematic literature review.护士对痴呆症护理的知识与态度:系统文献综述
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2019 Jan;55(1):48-60. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12291. Epub 2018 May 15.