Suppr超能文献

含达托霉素的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯骨水泥对抗万古霉素耐药菌:剂量、操作、洗脱、机械稳定性及有效性

Daptomycin-Impregnated PMMA Cement against Vancomycin-Resistant Germs: Dosage, Handling, Elution, Mechanical Stability, and Effectiveness.

作者信息

Humez Martina, Domann Eugen, Thormann Kai M, Fölsch Christian, Strathausen Rainer, Vogt Sebastian, Alt Volker, Kühn Klaus-Dieter

机构信息

Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Schubertstrasse 81, 35392 Giessen, Germany.

Heraeus Medical GmbH, Philipp-Reis-Str. 8-13, 61273 Wehrheim, Germany.

出版信息

Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Oct 26;12(11):1567. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12111567.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The number of periprosthetic joint infections caused by vancomycin-resistant pathogens is increasing. Currently, no PMMA cement is commercially available to cover VRE. Daptomycin shows promising results in treating infection, offering a good safety profile and a reduced risk of developing resistance. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the mechanical stability, handling properties, elution behavior, and antimicrobial effectiveness of PMMA cement loaded with three different daptomycin concentrations in comparison to commercially available antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC).

METHODS

Mechanical properties and handling characteristics (ISO 5833, DIN 53435), HPLC elution, antimicrobial effectiveness with proliferation assay (DIN 17025), and inhibition zone testing were investigated.

RESULTS

All tested daptomycin concentrations met the ISO and DIN standards for mechanical strength. Loading of 40 g of PMMA cement with 0.5 g of daptomycin did not show any antimicrobial effectiveness, in contrast to 1.0 g and 1.5 g. PMMA cement with 1.5 g of daptomycin was the best in terms of elution and effectiveness, and it showed good ISO mechanical strength; ISO doughing was sticky for a little longer and setting was faster compared to the vancomycin-containing reference cement.

CONCLUSION

PMMA cement containing 0.5 g of gentamicin and 1.5 g of daptomycin could be a good alternative to the already established COPAL (Wehrheim, Germany) G+V for the treatment of PJIs caused by VRE.

摘要

背景

由耐万古霉素病原体引起的人工关节周围感染数量正在增加。目前,市场上没有可用于覆盖耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)骨水泥。达托霉素在治疗感染方面显示出有前景的结果,具有良好的安全性和降低的耐药风险。本体外研究的目的是研究加载三种不同达托霉素浓度的PMMA骨水泥与市售含抗生素骨水泥(ALBC)相比的机械稳定性、操作性能、洗脱行为和抗菌效果。

方法

研究了机械性能和操作特性(ISO 5833,DIN 53435)、高效液相色谱洗脱、增殖试验的抗菌效果(DIN 17025)和抑菌圈测试。

结果

所有测试的达托霉素浓度均符合机械强度的ISO和DIN标准。与1.0 g和1.5 g相比,在40 g PMMA骨水泥中加载0.5 g达托霉素未显示出任何抗菌效果。含1.5 g达托霉素的PMMA骨水泥在洗脱和效果方面最佳,并且显示出良好的ISO机械强度;与含万古霉素的对照骨水泥相比,ISO面团期粘性持续时间稍长且凝固更快。

结论

含0.5 g庆大霉素和1.5 g达托霉素的PMMA骨水泥可能是已有的德国韦尔海姆COPAL G+V治疗由VRE引起的人工关节感染(PJI)的良好替代品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c5/10668807/a8c490562015/antibiotics-12-01567-g001a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验