Mbuya-Bienge Cynthia, Pashayan Nora, Kazemali Cornelia D, Lapointe Julie, Simard Jacques, Nabi Hermann
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, QC G1S 4L8, Canada.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 12;15(22):5380. doi: 10.3390/cancers15225380.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the form of a polygenic risk score (PRS) have emerged as a promising factor that could improve the predictive performance of breast cancer (BC) risk prediction tools. This study aims to appraise and critically assess the current evidence on these tools. Studies were identified using Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library up to November 2022 and were included if they described the development and/ or validation of a BC risk prediction model using a PRS for women of the general population and if they reported a measure of predictive performance. We identified 37 articles, of which 29 combined genetic and non-genetic risk factors using seven different risk prediction tools. Most models (55.0%) were developed on populations from European ancestry and performed better than those developed on populations from other ancestry groups. Regardless of the number of SNPs in each PRS, models combining a PRS with genetic and non-genetic risk factors generally had better discriminatory accuracy (AUC from 0.52 to 0.77) than those using a PRS alone (AUC from 0.48 to 0.68). The overall risk of bias was considered low in most studies. BC risk prediction tools combining a PRS with genetic and non-genetic risk factors provided better discriminative accuracy than either used alone. Further studies are needed to cross-compare their clinical utility and readiness for implementation in public health practices.
以多基因风险评分(PRS)形式存在的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)已成为一个有前景的因素,有望提高乳腺癌(BC)风险预测工具的预测性能。本研究旨在评估和严格评价关于这些工具的现有证据。通过检索截至
2022 年 11 月的 Medline、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆来确定研究,如果这些研究描述了使用 PRS 为一般人群中的女性开发和 / 或验证 BC 风险预测模型,并且报告了预测性能的衡量指标,则纳入研究。我们确定了 37 篇文章,其中 29 篇使用七种不同的风险预测工具结合了遗传和非遗传风险因素。大多数模型(55.0%)是在欧洲血统人群中开发的,并且比在其他血统人群中开发的模型表现更好。无论每个 PRS 中的 SNP 数量如何,将 PRS 与遗传和非遗传风险因素相结合的模型通常比单独使用 PRS 的模型具有更好的区分准确性(AUC 为 0.52 至 0.77),而单独使用 PRS 的模型的 AUC 为 0.48 至 0.68。大多数研究中总体偏倚风险被认为较低。将 PRS 与遗传和非遗传风险因素相结合的 BC 风险预测工具比单独使用任何一种工具都具有更好的区分准确性。需要进一步研究来交叉比较它们的临床效用以及在公共卫生实践中实施的准备情况。