Zulfiqar Abrar-Ahmad, Fresne Mathieu, Andres Emmanuel
Geriatric Readaptation Unit, Vitry-Le-François Hospital, 51300 Vitry-Le-François, France.
General Medicine Department, University Hospital of Reims, 51100 Reims, France.
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 7;12(22):6972. doi: 10.3390/jcm12226972.
Rapid identification of frail elderly individuals upon admission to the emergency department is pivotal for enhancing their care and alleviating emergency room congestion.
This pilot study aims to explore the relationship between morbidity, mortality, and frailty, as assessed by the mSEGA scale, among individuals aged 65 years or older in the emergency department.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single center. The pilot study included patients aged 65 and above who were admitted to Chaumont Hospital's emergency unit (Haute-Marne department) for medical and/or surgical reasons between 1 July 2017 and 31 January 2018. Data encompassed socio-demographic characteristics, medical profiles, and emergency department visit details. Outcomes for patients one year post-admission were obtained through consultation with their respective general practitioners.
A total of 255 subjects participated, with a mean age of 82.1 ± 8.2 years. Primary admission reasons were falls ( = 51, 20.0%), digestive issues (excluding hemorrhage) ( = 30, 11.8%), and "other" causes ( = 61, 23.9%). Among participants, 78 (30.6%) scored ≤8 on the mSEGA frailty scale, 49 (19.2%) scored 9 to 11, and 125 (50.2%) scored ≥12. Concerning post-emergency department outcomes, 152 patients (59.6%) were hospitalized, while 103 (40.4%) were discharged. No deaths were reported during the study period, and vital status was known for all subjects at the one-year mark. At that point, 63 out of 255 patients had passed away, with 30 of them being readmitted to the emergency department either before or at the time of their one-year death. The 12-month survival rate analysis based on frailty status revealed a significant difference. Low-frailty patients exhibited a survival rate of 87.2% (95% CI; [77.5-92.9]), whereas frail/very frail patients had a survival rate of 70.0% (95% CI; [62.7-76.2]). Similarly, the 12-month readmission-free survival rate demonstrated statistically significant disparities. Low-frailty patients had a rate of 76.9% (95% CI; [65.9-84.8]), compared to 51.4% (95% CI; [43.8-58.5]) for very frail patients.
Utilizing the mSEGA frailty scale in the Emergency Department could provide crucial prognostic insights, highlighting significant differences in 12-month survival and readmission-free survival rates based on frailty status.
在急诊科收治时快速识别体弱老年人对于改善其护理和缓解急诊室拥堵至关重要。
本试点研究旨在探讨急诊科65岁及以上患者中,通过mSEGA量表评估的发病率、死亡率与体弱之间的关系。
在单一中心进行回顾性队列研究。该试点研究纳入了2017年7月1日至2018年1月31日期间因医疗和/或手术原因入住肖蒙医院急诊科(上马恩省)的65岁及以上患者。数据包括社会人口学特征、医疗档案和急诊科就诊细节。通过与各自的全科医生咨询获得患者入院一年后的结局。
共有255名受试者参与,平均年龄为82.1±8.2岁。主要入院原因是跌倒(n = 51,20.0%)、消化系统问题(不包括出血)(n = 30,11.8%)和“其他”原因(n = 61,23.9%)。在参与者中,78人(30.6%)在mSEGA体弱量表上得分≤8,49人(19.2%)得分9至11,125人(50.2%)得分≥12。关于急诊科后的结局,152名患者(59.6%)住院,而103名患者(40.4%)出院。研究期间未报告死亡病例,在一年时所有受试者的生命状态均已知晓。此时,255名患者中有63人去世,其中30人在一年死亡前或死亡时再次入住急诊科。基于体弱状态的12个月生存率分析显示出显著差异。低体弱患者的生存率为87.2%(95%CI;[77.5 - 92.9]),而体弱/非常体弱患者的生存率为70.0%(95%CI;[62.7 - 76.2])。同样,12个月无再入院生存率也显示出统计学上的显著差异。低体弱患者的比率为76.9%(95%CI;[65.9 - 84.8]),而非常体弱患者为51.4%(95%CI;[43.8 - 58.5])。
在急诊科使用mSEGA体弱量表可提供关键的预后见解,突出基于体弱状态的12个月生存率和无再入院生存率的显著差异。