Slankamenac Ksenija, Haberkorn Gertraud, Meyer Otto, Bischoff-Ferrari Heike A, Keller Dagmar I
Emergency Department, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Geriatrics, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Centre on Aging and Mobility, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Geriatrics (Basel). 2018 Jun 21;3(3):33. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics3030033.
The "Identification of Seniors at Risk" (ISAR) screening is a tool to identify seniors at risk of adverse outcomes. We investigated whether seniors with a positive ISAR screening have an increased risk of Emergency Department (ED) re-visits and health-service costs. In a pilot project, we enrolled 96 ED patients (≥70 years) who received an ISAR screening in the ED. We compared the rate of ED re-visits and in-hospital costs between ISAR positive (≥2 pts) and ISAR negative (<2 pts) patients. In some patients, a geriatrician performed a single Geriatric Consultation (GC) during the ED stay to assess older patients' needs.32% of the study population had an unplanned ED re-visit (31 of 96). Fifty patients were ISAR positive (52%) and showed an increased risk of ED re-visits compared with ISAR negative patients (dds ratio (OR) 6.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2-21.0, = 0.001). The positive ISAR screening tool fairly predicted ED re-visits in seniors (area under the curve (AUC) 0.711). A single GC during the ED stay did not reduce the risk of unplanned ED re-visits in ISAR positive patients ( = 0.80) ISAR positive patients with GC did not have higher in-hospital costs than ISAR negative patients without GC. Based on these findings, we aim to establish a comprehensive outpatient geriatric assessment program to identify relevant risk factors for ED re-visits and to recommend preventive strategies in ISAR positive ED seniors.
“高危老年人识别”(ISAR)筛查是一种识别有不良后果风险的老年人的工具。我们调查了ISAR筛查呈阳性的老年人再次前往急诊科(ED)就诊的风险以及医疗服务成本是否增加。在一个试点项目中,我们招募了96名在急诊科接受ISAR筛查的老年患者(≥70岁)。我们比较了ISAR阳性(≥2分)和ISAR阴性(<2分)患者的急诊科再次就诊率和住院费用。在一些患者中,老年病医生在急诊科停留期间进行了一次老年病咨询(GC),以评估老年患者的需求。32%的研究人群进行了非计划的急诊科再次就诊(96人中的31人)。50名患者ISAR呈阳性(52%),与ISAR阴性患者相比,其急诊科再次就诊的风险增加(比值比(OR)6.8,95%置信区间(CI)2.2 - 21.0,P = 0.001)。阳性ISAR筛查工具能较好地预测老年人的急诊科再次就诊情况(曲线下面积(AUC)0.711)。在急诊科停留期间进行一次GC并不能降低ISAR阳性患者非计划的急诊科再次就诊风险(P = 0.80)。接受GC的ISAR阳性患者的住院费用并不高于未接受GC的ISAR阴性患者。基于这些发现,我们旨在建立一个全面的门诊老年评估项目,以识别急诊科再次就诊的相关风险因素,并为ISAR阳性的急诊科老年患者推荐预防策略。