Zeiner Sebastian, Zadrazil Markus, Willschke Harald, Wiegele Marion, Marhofer Peter, Hammerle Fabian Peter, Laxar Daniel, Gleiss Andreas, Kimberger Oliver
Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety (LBI DHPS), 1090 Vienna, Austria.
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 9;12(22):7018. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227018.
Accurate temperature measurement is crucial for the perioperative management of pediatric patients, and non-invasive thermometry is necessary when invasive methods are infeasible. A prospective observational study was conducted on 57 patients undergoing elective surgery. Temperatures were measured using a dual-sensor heat-flux (DHF) thermometer (Tcore™) and a rectal temperature probe (TRec), and the agreement between the two measurements was assessed. The DHF measurements showed a bias of +0.413 °C compared with those of the TRec. The limits of agreement were broader than the pre-defined ±0.5 °C range (-0.741 °C and +1.567 °C). Although the DHF sensors tended to overestimate the core temperature compared to the rectal measurements, an error grid analysis demonstrated that 95.81% of the DHF measurements would not have led to a wrong clinical decision, e.g., warming or cooling when not necessary. In conclusion, the low number of measurements that would have led to incorrect decisions suggests that the DHF sensor can be considered an option for continuous temperature measurement when more invasive methods are infeasible.
准确的体温测量对于小儿患者的围手术期管理至关重要,当侵入性方法不可行时,非侵入性体温测量是必要的。对57例接受择期手术的患者进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。使用双传感器热通量(DHF)温度计(Tcore™)和直肠温度探头(TRec)测量体温,并评估两种测量方法之间的一致性。与TRec相比,DHF测量显示偏差为+0.413℃。一致性界限比预先定义的±0.5℃范围更宽(-0.741℃和+1.567℃)。尽管与直肠测量相比,DHF传感器倾向于高估核心体温,但误差网格分析表明,95.81%的DHF测量不会导致错误的临床决策,例如在不必要时进行升温或降温。总之,导致错误决策的测量次数较少,这表明当更具侵入性的方法不可行时,DHF传感器可被视为连续体温测量的一种选择。