Ballesteros-Sánchez Antonio, Peraza-Nieves Jorge, Casablanca-Piñera Anna, Rodríguez-Calvo-De-Mora Marina, Catalán-Coronado Saray, Torras-Sanvicens Josep, Borroni Davide, Sánchez-González José-María, Rocha-De-Lossada Carlos
Department of Physics of Condensed Matter, Optics Area, University of Seville, 41004 Seville, Spain.
Department of Ophthalmology, Novovision Ophthalmologic Clinic, 30008 Murcia, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 16;12(22):7133. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227133.
To compare corneal densitometry (CD) patterns at the graft-host interface between Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK). Corneal densitometry is a quantitative assessment that objectively evaluates corneal clarity and optical quality by measuring the light backscatter from the cornea.
Fifty-one eyes that received DMEK or DSAEK surgery for corneal endothelium dysfunction were evaluated. The primary endpoint included CD patterns at the graft-host interface, which were assessed by the Pentacam HR device at the center point of the corneal horizontal meridian (CD), and at six points on the central circumference of the cornea (with a total diameter of 4 mm) (CD). Secondary endpoints included the best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and graft thickness (GT). All of the evaluations were performed at follow-up appointments one, three, six and twelve months after the procedure.
DMEK showed a significant overall CD reduction of -7.9 ± 8.5 grayscale unit (GSU) compared to DSAEK ( < 0.001). In addition, the DMEK group showed significantly lower CD values at follow-up appointments one, three, six and twelve months after the procedure compared to the DSAEK group ( < 0.001). BCDVA, CCT and GT were in favor of the DMEK group with a mean value of 0.39 ± 0.35 LogMar, 552.2 ± 71.1 µm and 11.03 ± 1.4 µm, respectively ( < 0.001).
CD patterns at the graft-host interface seem to be different depending on the endothelial keratoplasty procedure. This provides specific insight into CD changes in this critical region of surgery, which may provide a better understanding of the postoperative evolution of these patients.
比较Descemet膜内皮角膜移植术(DMEK)和Descemet膜剥除自动内皮角膜移植术(DSAEK)中移植片与宿主界面处的角膜密度测量(CD)模式。角膜密度测量是一种通过测量角膜的光背散射来客观评估角膜透明度和光学质量的定量评估方法。
对51只因角膜内皮功能障碍接受DMEK或DSAEK手术的眼睛进行评估。主要终点包括移植片与宿主界面处的CD模式,通过Pentacam HR设备在角膜水平子午线的中心点(CD)以及角膜中央圆周上的六个点(总直径为4mm)(CD)进行评估。次要终点包括最佳矫正远视力(BCDVA)、中央角膜厚度(CCT)和移植片厚度(GT)。所有评估均在术后1个月、3个月、6个月和12个月的随访中进行。
与DSAEK相比,DMEK的总体CD显著降低-7.9±8.5灰度单位(GSU)(P<0.001)。此外,与DSAEK组相比,DMEK组在术后1个月、3个月、6个月和12个月的随访中CD值显著更低(P<0.001)。BCDVA、CCT和GT均有利于DMEK组,平均值分别为0.39±0.35 LogMar、552.2±71.1μm和11.03±1.4μm(P<0.001)。
移植片与宿主界面处的CD模式似乎因内皮角膜移植手术方式而异。这为该关键手术区域的CD变化提供了具体见解,可能有助于更好地理解这些患者的术后演变。