Aldaz-Lusarreta Alaitz, Campo-Bescós Miguel Ángel, Virto Iñigo, Giménez Rafael
Institute for Innovation & Sustainable Development in Food Chain (IS-FOOD), Public University of Navarre (UPNA), Campus de Arrosadia, 31006 Pamplona, Spain.
Department of Engineering, Los Olivos Building, Public University of Navarre (UPNA), Campus de Arrosadia, 31006 Pamplona, Spain.
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Nov 17;23(22):9255. doi: 10.3390/s23229255.
Proper irrigation practice consists of applying the optimum amount of water to the soil at the right time. The porous characteristics of the soil determine the capacity of the soil to absorb, infiltrate, and store water. In irrigation, it is not sufficient to only determine the water content of the soil; it is also necessary to determine the availability of water for plants: water potential. In this paper, a comprehensive laboratory evaluation-accuracy and variability-of the world's leading commercial water potential sensors is carried out. No such comprehensive and exhaustive comparative evaluation of these devices has been carried out to date. Ten pairs of representative commercial sensors from four different families were selected according to their principle of operation (tensiometers, capacitive sensors, heat dissipation sensors, and resistance blocks). The accuracy of the readings (0 kPa-200 kPa) was determined in two soils of contrasting textures. The variability in the recordings-repeatability and reproducibility-was carried out in a homogeneous and inert material (sand) in the same suction range. The response in terms of accuracy and value dispersion of the different sensor families was different according to the suction range considered. In the suction range of agronomic interest (0-100 kPa), the heat dissipation sensor and the capacitive sensors were the most accurate. In both families, registrations could be extended up to 150-200 kPa. The scatter in the readings across the different sensors was due to approximately 80% of the repeatability or intrinsic variability in the sensor unit and 20% of the reproducibility. Some sensors would significantly improve their performance with ad hoc calibrations.
正确的灌溉方法是在合适的时间向土壤施加适量的水。土壤的多孔特性决定了土壤吸收、渗透和储存水分的能力。在灌溉过程中,仅确定土壤的含水量是不够的;还需要确定植物可利用的水分:水势。本文对世界领先的商用水分传感器进行了全面的实验室评估——准确性和变异性。迄今为止,尚未对这些设备进行过如此全面详尽的比较评估。根据其工作原理(张力计、电容式传感器、散热传感器和电阻块),从四个不同系列中挑选出十对具有代表性的商用传感器。在两种质地截然不同的土壤中测定了读数(0千帕至200千帕)的准确性。在相同吸力范围内,在均质惰性材料(沙子)中进行了记录的变异性——重复性和再现性——测试。根据所考虑的吸力范围,不同传感器系列在准确性和数值离散方面的响应有所不同。在农艺学关注的吸力范围(0至100千帕)内,散热传感器和电容式传感器最为准确。在这两个系列中,记录范围均可扩展至150至200千帕。不同传感器读数的离散约80%归因于传感器单元的重复性或固有变异性,20%归因于再现性。一些传感器通过专门校准可显著提高其性能。