Russo Momtchilo, Mendes-Corrêa Maria Cássia, Lins Bruna B, Kersten Victor, Pernambuco Filho Paulo C A, Martins Toni Ricardo, Tozetto-Mendoza Tânia Regina, Vilas Boas Lucy Santos, Gomes Brisa Moreira, Dati Livia Mendonça Munhoz, Duarte-Neto Amaro Nunes, Reigado Gustavo Roncoli, Frederico Ana Beatriz T, de Brito E Cunha Danielle R de A, de Paula Anderson Vicente, da Silva José Igor G, Vasconcelos Carlos F Moreira, Chambergo Felipe S, Nunes Viviane Abreu, Ano Bom Ana Paula Dinis, Castilho Leda R, Martins Rodrigo A P, Hirata Mario Hiroyuki, Mirotti Luciana
Department of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Science, University of São Paulo (ICB-USP), São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.
Laboratório de Virologia (LIM52), Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FM-USP), São Paulo 05403-000, Brazil.
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Nov 20;11(11):1732. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11111732.
Mucosal vaccination appears to be suitable to protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this study, we tested an intranasal mucosal vaccine candidate for COVID-19 that consisted of a cationic liposome containing a trimeric SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and CpG-ODNs, a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist, as an adjuvant. In vitro and in vivo experiments indicated the absence of toxicity following the intranasal administration of this vaccine formulation. First, we found that subcutaneous or intranasal vaccination protected hACE-2 transgenic mice from infection with the wild-type (Wuhan) SARS-CoV-2 strain, as shown by weight loss and mortality indicators. However, when compared with subcutaneous administration, the intranasal route was more effective in the pulmonary clearance of the virus and induced higher neutralizing antibodies and anti-S IgA titers. In addition, the intranasal vaccination afforded protection against gamma, delta, and omicron virus variants of concern. Furthermore, the intranasal vaccine formulation was superior to intramuscular vaccination with a recombinant, replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus vector encoding the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein (Oxford/AstraZeneca) in terms of virus lung clearance and production of neutralizing antibodies in serum and bronchial alveolar lavage (BAL). Finally, the intranasal liposomal formulation boosted heterologous immunity induced by previous intramuscular vaccination with the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine, which was more robust than homologous immunity.
黏膜疫苗接种似乎适合预防新型冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染。在本研究中,我们测试了一种用于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的鼻内黏膜候选疫苗,该疫苗由一种含有三聚体SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白的阳离子脂质体和作为佐剂的Toll样受体9激动剂CpG寡脱氧核苷酸(CpG-ODNs)组成。体外和体内实验表明,鼻内给予这种疫苗制剂后没有毒性。首先,我们发现皮下或鼻内接种疫苗可保护人血管紧张素转换酶2(hACE-2)转基因小鼠免受野生型(武汉)SARS-CoV-2毒株感染,体重减轻和死亡率指标表明了这一点。然而,与皮下接种相比,鼻内途径在病毒的肺部清除方面更有效,并诱导产生更高的中和抗体和抗S IgA滴度。此外,鼻内接种疫苗可提供针对γ、δ和奥密克戎等关注的病毒变体的保护。此外,在病毒肺部清除以及血清和支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)中中和抗体的产生方面,鼻内疫苗制剂优于用编码SARS-CoV-2刺突糖蛋白的重组、复制缺陷型黑猩猩腺病毒载体(牛津/阿斯利康)进行的肌肉注射接种。最后,鼻内脂质体制剂增强了先前用牛津/阿斯利康疫苗进行肌肉注射接种所诱导的异源免疫,这种异源免疫比同源免疫更强。