• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Tumour, narrow pelvis and surgery specific factors for total mesorectal excision quality and morbidity following rectal cancer resection.肿瘤、骨盆狭窄和手术特定因素对直肠癌切除术后全直肠系膜切除质量和发病率的影响。
BJS Open. 2023 Nov 1;7(6). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad114.
2
Outcomes of open vs laparoscopic vs robotic vs transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis.直肠癌开放手术、腹腔镜手术、机器人手术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TME)的疗效:一项网状Meta分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 May;27(5):345-360. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02739-1. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
3
[Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的安全性及预后分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 25;25(6):522-530. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210811-00321.
4
Influence of pelvic volume on surgical outcome after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.盆腔容积对直肠癌低位前切除术后手术结果的影响。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Aug;32(8):1125-1135. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2793-9. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
5
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)治疗直肠癌:与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术相比的肿瘤学及围手术期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 4;16:380. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2428-5.
6
CT/MRI pelvimetry as a useful tool when selecting patients with rectal cancer for transanal total mesorectal excision.CT/MRI骨盆测量作为为直肠癌患者选择经肛门全直肠系膜切除术时的一种有用工具。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1164-71. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4324-5. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
7
Meta-analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in management of rectal cancer.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Apr;35(4):575-593. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03545-7. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
8
Total mesorectal excision for low and middle rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus transanal approach-a meta-analysis.直肠系膜全切除术治疗中低位直肠癌:腹腔镜与经肛门入路的比较——一项荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):3908-3919. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07160-8. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
9
Anastomotic leakage and chronic presacral sinus after transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: A comparative study to laparoscopic TME.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)治疗直肠癌后吻合口漏和慢性直肠前窦:与腹腔镜 TME 的对比研究。
Asian J Surg. 2022 Nov;45(11):2197-2202. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
10
Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)与 MRI 定义低位直肠癌的腹腔镜 TME 比较:基于倾向评分匹配的肿瘤学结局分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2459-2467. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6530-4. Epub 2018 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of computed tomography-based pelvimetric parameters and surgical approaches on surgical difficulty in mid‑low rectal cancer.基于计算机断层扫描的骨盆测量参数及手术方式对中低位直肠癌手术难度的影响
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2025 Jul 4;20(2):165-172. doi: 10.20452/wiitm.2025.. eCollection 2025 Jul 8.
2
A simple and effective evaluation method to determine the difficulty of total mesorectal excision for male patients with mid and lower rectal cancer.一种用于确定男性中低位直肠癌患者全直肠系膜切除术难度的简单有效评估方法。
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Jul 19;29(1):145. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03181-9.
3
Role of pelvimetry in predicting surgical outcomes and morbidity in rectal cancer surgery: A retrospective analysis.骨盆测量在预测直肠癌手术的手术结果及发病率中的作用:一项回顾性分析。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Apr 27;17(4):104726. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.104726.

本文引用的文献

1
Anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Retrospective analysis of risk factors.直肠癌手术中的吻合口漏:危险因素的回顾性分析
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Dec 26;10(36):13321-13336. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13321.
2
Identification of Risk Factors for Sexual Dysfunction after Multimodal Therapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer and Their Impact on Quality of Life: A Single-Center Trial.局部晚期直肠癌多模式治疗后性功能障碍的危险因素识别及其对生活质量的影响:一项单中心试验
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 24;14(23):5796. doi: 10.3390/cancers14235796.
3
Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Lower Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌的倾向评分匹配分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 24;14(17):4098. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174098.
4
Are risk factors for anastomotic leakage influencing long-term oncological outcomes after low anterior resection of locally advanced rectal cancer with neoadjuvant therapy? A single-centre cohort study.新辅助治疗后低位前切除局部进展期直肠癌吻合口漏的危险因素是否影响长期肿瘤学结果?一项单中心队列研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Nov;407(7):2945-2957. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02609-2. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
5
A new method of intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring: a preclinical feasibility study in a porcine model.一种新的术中骨盆神经监测方法:在猪模型中的临床前可行性研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 7;12(1):3696. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07576-8.
6
Transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a comparative study of long-term oncological outcomes.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术:长期肿瘤学结果的比较研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Apr;26(4):279-290. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02570-8. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
7
Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of short-term outcomes.腹腔镜与机器人辅助与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的比较:短期结局的回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Br J Surg. 2021 Nov 11;108(11):1380-1387. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab233.
8
Localised colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.局限性结肠癌:ESMO 诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2020 Oct;31(10):1291-1305. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.022. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
9
The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review.MRI 骨盆测量在预测开腹和微创全直肠系膜切除术技术难度和结局中的作用:系统评价。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Oct;24(10):991-1000. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02274-x. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
10
Does anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection worsen long-term oncologic outcome?直肠癌切除术后吻合口漏是否会恶化长期肿瘤学结果?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jul;35(7):1243-1253. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03577-z. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

肿瘤、骨盆狭窄和手术特定因素对直肠癌切除术后全直肠系膜切除质量和发病率的影响。

Tumour, narrow pelvis and surgery specific factors for total mesorectal excision quality and morbidity following rectal cancer resection.

机构信息

Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria.

Department of Radio-Oncology, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2023 Nov 1;7(6). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad114.

DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrad114
PMID:38006203
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10674077/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pelvic anatomy is critical in challenging rectal resections. This study investigated how pelvic anatomy relates to total mesorectal excision (TME) quality, anastomotic leakage rate, and long-term oncological outcomes.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective rectal cancer resection from 2008 to 2017 in an Austrian institution were retrospectively reviewed regardless of the surgical approach. CT scans were analysed for pelvic measurements and volumes. The primary outcomes of interest were the correlation between pelvic dimensions and the TME quality and anastomotic leakage. Subanalysis was done by surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, transanal TME). Secondary outcomes were overall and disease-free survivals.

RESULTS

Among 154 eligible patients, 112 were included. The angle between pubic symphysis and promontory significantly correlated with worse TME grades (TME grade 1: mean(s.d.) 102.7(5.7)°; TME grade 2: 92.0(4.4)°; TME grade 3: 91.4(3.6)°; P < 0.001). A significantly lower distance between tumour and circumferential resection margin (CRM) was observed in grade 3 resections, whereas no difference appeared in grade 1 and grade 2 resection (TME grade 1: mean(s.d.) 11.92(9.4) mm; TME grade 2: 10.8(8.1) mm; TME grade 3: 3.1(4.1) mm; P = 0.003). The anastomotic leakage rate was significantly higher in case of a lower CRM (patients with anastomotic leakage: mean(s.d.) 6.8(5.8) mm versus others: 12.6(9.8) mm, P = 0.027), but not associated with pelvimetry measurements. The transanal TME (TaTME) subgroup displayed a wider angle between the pubic symphysis and promontory, younger age and improved TME quality compared to others (respectively, mean TME grades in TaTME versus open versus laparoscopic: 1.0 ± 0.0, 1.5 ± 0.7 and 1.3 ± 0.5, P = 0.013). Finally, oncological survival was not impacted by pelvic measurements or worse TME quality.

CONCLUSION

The angle between the pubic symphysis and promontory and the distance between tumour and CRM were associated with worse TME grades. The anastomotic leakage was associated with a lower CRM but not with pelvimetric measures.

摘要

背景

盆腔解剖在直肠切除术方面具有重要意义。本研究旨在探讨盆腔解剖与全直肠系膜切除术(TME)质量、吻合口漏发生率和长期肿瘤学结果的关系。

方法

回顾性分析 2008 年至 2017 年在奥地利一家机构接受择期直肠切除术的患者,无论手术方式如何均纳入研究。对 CT 扫描进行盆腔测量和体积分析。主要研究结果为盆腔测量与 TME 质量和吻合口漏的相关性。通过手术方式(开腹、腹腔镜、经肛门 TME)进行亚分析。次要结果为总生存和无病生存。

结果

在 154 名符合条件的患者中,纳入了 112 名患者。耻骨联合与穹窿之间的角度与较差的 TME 分级显著相关(TME 分级 1:平均(标准差)102.7(5.7)°;TME 分级 2:92.0(4.4)°;TME 分级 3:91.4(3.6)°;P<0.001)。在 TME 分级 3 中,肿瘤与环周切缘(CRM)之间的距离明显更低,而 TME 分级 1 和分级 2 之间无差异(TME 分级 1:平均(标准差)11.92(9.4)mm;TME 分级 2:10.8(8.1)mm;TME 分级 3:3.1(4.1)mm;P=0.003)。较低的 CRM 与更高的吻合口漏发生率相关(吻合口漏患者:平均(标准差)6.8(5.8)mm 与其他患者:12.6(9.8)mm,P=0.027),但与盆腔测量无关。与其他患者相比,经肛门 TME(TaTME)亚组的耻骨联合与穹窿之间的角度更宽,年龄更小,TME 质量更好(分别为 TaTME 中的平均 TME 分级与开腹、腹腔镜:1.0±0.0、1.5±0.7 和 1.3±0.5,P=0.013)。最后,盆腔测量或较差的 TME 质量并不影响肿瘤学生存。

结论

耻骨联合与穹窿之间的角度和肿瘤与 CRM 之间的距离与较差的 TME 分级相关。吻合口漏与较低的 CRM 相关,但与盆腔测量值无关。