Suppr超能文献

数字健康接受度问卷的编制与验证。

Development and validation of the Digital Health Acceptability Questionnaire.

机构信息

Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

J Telemed Telecare. 2023 Dec;29(10_suppl):8S-15S. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231202279.

Abstract

Acceptability (of healthcare services) is an important construct that lacks a consistent definition within research. Addressing this issue, a systematic review led to the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. In this study, we describe the development (based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability) and validation of the Digital Health Acceptability Questionnaire. Nineteen items aligning with the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability were developed. Two versions of the questionnaire measuring telehealth acceptability by telephone ( = 644) and videoconference appointment ( = 425), were administered to a nationally representative survey of consumers in Australia. Two exploratory factor analyses (Oblimin rotation) were conducted for each scale (telephone/videoconference). Two-factor solutions (5 items each) were found for both (telephone/videoconference) acceptability questionnaires: (a) attitude toward the service as a means to address healthcare needs and affective attitude and (b) individual capacity and effort to use telehealth. Before rotation, Factor 1 of the telephone scale (α = 0.92) measured 56.18% of the variance and Factor 2 (α = 0.86) measured 14.17%. Factor 1 of the videoconference scale (α = 0.90) measured 56.68% of the variance and Factor 2 (α = 0.85) measured 10.63%. The full10-item acceptability questionnaire showed excellent internal consistency (telephone: α = 0.91 and videoconference: α = 0.92). The 2-dimensional Digital Health Acceptability Questionnaire is a brief survey based on research evidence and validated in a large Australian sample.

摘要

可接受性(医疗服务)是一个重要的概念,在研究中缺乏一致的定义。为了解决这个问题,一项系统综述导致了可接受性的理论框架的产生。在这项研究中,我们描述了数字健康可接受性问卷的开发(基于可接受性的理论框架)和验证。与可接受性的理论框架相一致的 19 个项目被开发出来。两种版本的问卷通过电话( = 644)和视频预约( = 425)来衡量远程医疗的可接受性,对澳大利亚全国代表性的消费者调查进行了调查。对每个量表(电话/视频会议)进行了两次探索性因素分析(斜交旋转)。为每个可接受性问卷(电话/视频会议)找到了两个因素解决方案(每个因素各 5 个项目):(a)将服务作为满足医疗保健需求的手段的态度和情感态度,以及(b)个人使用远程医疗的能力和努力。在旋转之前,电话量表的因素 1(α = 0.92)测量了 56.18%的方差,因素 2(α = 0.86)测量了 14.17%。视频会议量表的因素 1(α = 0.90)测量了 56.68%的方差,因素 2(α = 0.85)测量了 10.63%。完整的 10 项可接受性问卷显示出极好的内部一致性(电话:α = 0.91 和视频会议:α = 0.92)。二维数字健康可接受性问卷是一种基于研究证据并在澳大利亚大样本中验证的简短调查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验