Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Jan 1;184(1):54-62. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.6279.
Modifiable risk factors are hypothesized to account for 30% to 40% of dementia; yet, few trials have demonstrated that risk-reduction interventions, especially multidomain, are efficacious.
To determine if a personalized, multidomain risk reduction intervention improves cognition and dementia risk profile among older adults.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Systematic Multi-Domain Alzheimer Risk Reduction Trial was a randomized clinical trial with a 2-year personalized, risk-reduction intervention. A total of 172 adults at elevated risk for dementia (age 70-89 years and with ≥2 of 8 targeted risk factors) were recruited from primary care clinics associated with Kaiser Permanente Washington. Data were collected from August 2018 to August 2022 and analyzed from October 2022 to September 2023.
Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (personalized risk-reduction goals with health coaching and nurse visits) or to a health education control.
The primary outcome was change in a composite modified Neuropsychological Test Battery; preplanned secondary outcomes were change in risk factors and quality of life (QOL). Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Linear mixed models were used to compare, by intention to treat, average treatment effects (ATEs) from baseline over follow-up. The intervention and outcomes were initially in person but then, due to onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, were remote.
The 172 total participants had a mean (SD) age of 75.7 (4.8) years, and 108 (62.8%) were women. After 2 years, compared with the 90 participants in the control group, the 82 participants assigned to intervention demonstrated larger improvements in the composite cognitive score (ATE of SD, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.25; P = .02; a 74% improvement compared with the change in the control group), better composite risk factor score (ATE of SD, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.01-0.20; P = .03), and improved QOL (ATE, 0.81 points; 95% CI, -0.21 to 1.84; P = .12). There were no between-group differences in serious adverse events (24 in the intervention group and 23 in the control group; P = .59), but the intervention group had greater treatment-related adverse events such as musculoskeletal pain (14 in the intervention group vs 0 in the control group; P < .001).
In this randomized clinical trial, a 2-year, personalized, multidomain intervention led to modest improvements in cognition, dementia risk factors, and QOL. Modifiable risk-reduction strategies should be considered for older adults at risk for dementia.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03683394.
可改变的风险因素据推测占痴呆症的 30%至 40%;然而,很少有试验表明,风险降低干预措施,尤其是多领域的干预措施,是有效的。
确定个性化、多领域的风险降低干预措施是否能改善老年人的认知能力和痴呆风险状况。
设计、地点和参与者:系统多领域阿尔茨海默病风险降低试验是一项随机临床试验,为期 2 年的个性化、风险降低干预措施。共有 172 名处于痴呆高风险的成年人(年龄 70-89 岁,有 8 个目标风险因素中的≥2 个)从与 Kaiser Permanente Washington 相关的初级保健诊所招募。数据收集于 2018 年 8 月至 2022 年 8 月,并于 2023 年 10 月至 9 月进行分析。
参与者被随机分配到干预组(个性化的风险降低目标,包括健康指导和护士访视)或健康教育对照组。
主要结果是改良神经心理测试电池的复合变化;预先计划的次要结果是风险因素和生活质量(QOL)的变化。在基线和 6、12、18 和 24 个月时进行评估。线性混合模型用于按意向治疗比较随访期间的平均治疗效果(ATE)。干预和结果最初是面对面的,但由于 COVID-19 大流行的爆发,后来转为远程进行。
172 名参与者的平均(SD)年龄为 75.7(4.8)岁,108 名(62.8%)为女性。与对照组的 90 名参与者相比,经过 2 年的治疗,82 名被分配到干预组的参与者在复合认知评分方面有更大的改善(ATE,0.14;95%CI,0.03-0.25;P=0.02;与对照组相比,改善了 74%),复合风险因素评分更好(ATE,0.11;95%CI,0.01-0.20;P=0.03),生活质量得到改善(ATE,0.81 分;95%CI,-0.21 至 1.84;P=0.12)。两组之间严重不良事件(干预组 24 例,对照组 23 例;P=0.59)没有差异,但干预组出现了更多的与治疗相关的不良事件,如肌肉骨骼疼痛(干预组 14 例,对照组 0 例;P<0.001)。
在这项随机临床试验中,为期 2 年的个性化、多领域干预措施导致认知能力、痴呆风险因素和生活质量适度改善。对于有痴呆风险的老年人,应考虑采取可改变的风险降低策略。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03683394。