• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男性心理研究随机等待名单对照试验:提高心理健康从业者自我评估的临床能力,以与男性合作。

A randomized wait-list controlled trial of Men in Mind: Enhancing mental health practitioners' self-rated clinical competencies to work with men.

机构信息

Orygen.

Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2024 Apr;79(3):423-436. doi: 10.1037/amp0001242. Epub 2023 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1037/amp0001242
PMID:38010768
Abstract

Improved engagement of men in psychotherapy is an essential element in improving male health outcomes. This trial examined whether the Men in Mind intervention improved practitioners' self-rated clinical competencies to engage and respond to male clients in therapy. A parallel, single-blind, wait-list randomized controlled trial was conducted with Australian-based mental health practitioners, currently administering psychotherapy to males, fluent in English, and not currently completing their undergraduate degree. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1, through variable-sized blocks stratified by gender, to either the intervention (Men in Mind) or wait-list control. Men in Mind was offered as a self-led 6-week, five-module online program to upskill practitioners to engage and respond to male clients. The primary outcome was self-reported competency in engaging men in psychotherapy, measured by the Engaging Men in Therapy Scale (EMITS) at 6 weeks. All analyses were by intention-to-treat. Between January 16 and March 17, 2022, 587 participants were randomly assigned to the intervention ( = 300) or wait-list control ( = 287). In total, 492 (84%) participants completed the primary endpoint assessment at 6 weeks. Men in Mind demonstrated a large effect of improved EMITS scores compared to the control group ( = 2.63, 95% CI [2.39, 2.87], < .001). Men in Mind was effective at increasing mental health practitioners' self-reported efficacy to work with men, which is potentially a key change mechanism in their ability to improve health outcomes for male clients. A limitation of the trial was the use of a bespoke, self-reported primary outcome, while a strength was the gender-responsive intervention design. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

提高男性参与心理治疗的积极性是改善男性健康结果的一个重要因素。本试验研究了 Men in Mind 干预措施是否提高了从业者在治疗中吸引和回应男性客户的自我评估临床能力。这是一项平行的、单盲、等待名单随机对照试验,对象是澳大利亚的心理健康从业者,他们目前正在用英语为男性提供心理治疗,并且目前尚未完成本科课程。参与者通过按性别分层的大小可变块以 1:1 的比例被随机分配到干预组(Men in Mind)或等待名单对照组。Men in Mind 是一个为期 6 周、5 个模块的在线自我引导计划,旨在提高从业者吸引和回应男性客户的能力。主要结果是通过 Engaging Men in Therapy Scale(EMITS)在 6 周时衡量的心理治疗中吸引男性的自我报告能力。所有分析均采用意向治疗。在 2022 年 1 月 16 日至 3 月 17 日期间,587 名参与者被随机分配到干预组(n = 300)或等待名单对照组(n = 287)。共有 492 名(84%)参与者在 6 周时完成了主要终点评估。与对照组相比,Men in Mind 显著提高了 EMITS 评分( = 2.63,95%CI [2.39, 2.87], <.001)。Men in Mind 有效地提高了心理健康从业者自我报告与男性合作的效能,这可能是他们改善男性客户健康结果的能力的关键变化机制。试验的一个局限性是使用了定制的、自我报告的主要结局,而一个优势是性别响应的干预设计。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
A randomized wait-list controlled trial of Men in Mind: Enhancing mental health practitioners' self-rated clinical competencies to work with men.男性心理研究随机等待名单对照试验:提高心理健康从业者自我评估的临床能力,以与男性合作。
Am Psychol. 2024 Apr;79(3):423-436. doi: 10.1037/amp0001242. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
2
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of the Men in Mind training for mental health practitioners to enhance their clinical competencies for working with male clients.《男性心理训练对心理健康从业者的随机对照试验方案》旨在提高他们为男性客户提供服务的临床能力。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Jul 15;10(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00875-9.
3
Effect of a Qigong Intervention on Telomerase Activity and Mental Health in Chinese Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.气功干预对亲密伴侣暴力中国女性幸存者端粒酶活性和心理健康的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e186967. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6967.
4
Control interventions in randomised trials among people with mental health disorders.精神障碍患者随机试验中的对照干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):MR000050. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000050.pub2.
5
Supporting Clinical Competencies in Men's Mental Health Using the Men in Mind Practitioner Training Program: User Experience Study.使用“心中有男”从业者培训项目支持男性心理健康方面的临床能力:用户体验研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Nov 7;9:e48804. doi: 10.2196/48804.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
White and non-White Australian mental health care practitioners' desirable responding, cultural competence, and racial/ethnic attitudes.澳大利亚白人和非白种人心理健康护理从业者的理想反应、文化能力和种族/民族态度。
BMC Psychol. 2022 May 7;10(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00818-4.
8
A transdiagnostic community-based mental health treatment for comorbid disorders: development and outcomes of a randomized controlled trial among Burmese refugees in Thailand.一种针对共病障碍的基于社区的跨诊断心理健康治疗:泰国缅甸难民随机对照试验的开展与结果
PLoS Med. 2014 Nov 11;11(11):e1001757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001757. eCollection 2014 Nov.
9
A brief intervention to increase uptake and adherence of an online program for depression and anxiety: Protocol for the Enhancing Engagement with Psychosocial Interventions (EEPI) Randomized Controlled Trial.一项提高在线抑郁和焦虑干预措施的参与度和依从性的简短干预措施:增强对心理社会干预措施的参与度(EEPI)随机对照试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Mar;78:107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
10
Acupuncture for depression.针灸治疗抑郁症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 4;3(3):CD004046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004046.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Problem Gambling in Young Men: The Impact of Sports Gambling Frequency and Internalizing Symptoms.预测青年男性的问题赌博行为:体育赌博频率和内化症状的影响。
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1007/s10899-025-10403-0.
2
"They're Lacking Purpose. It's a Recipe for Suicide.": Masculinity and Gender-Based Inequalities in Deaths of Despair in England.“他们缺乏目标。这是自杀的诱因。”:英国绝望死亡中的男性气质与性别不平等
Am J Mens Health. 2025 Mar-Apr;19(2):15579883251329715. doi: 10.1177/15579883251329715. Epub 2025 May 1.
3
Men's mental health and suicide prevention service landscape in Australia: a scoping review.
澳大利亚男性心理健康与自杀预防服务概况:一项范围综述
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):1593. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22676-6.
4
Gender Differences in Coping Strategies and Life Satisfaction Following Cognitive-Behavioral and Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Crohn's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.针对克罗恩病的认知行为和正念干预后应对策略及生活满意度的性别差异:一项随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 26;14(5):1569. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051569.
5
Understanding Men's Lived Experience of Mental Distress Through Metaphors.通过隐喻理解男性的精神困扰体验
Am J Mens Health. 2024 May-Jun;18(3):15579883241260920. doi: 10.1177/15579883241260920.
6
Approaches to Engaging Men During Primary Healthcare Encounters: A scoping review.在初级医疗保健中接触男性的方法:范围综述。
Am J Mens Health. 2024 Mar-Apr;18(2):15579883241241090. doi: 10.1177/15579883241241090.
7
Supporting Clinical Competencies in Men's Mental Health Using the Men in Mind Practitioner Training Program: User Experience Study.使用“心中有男”从业者培训项目支持男性心理健康方面的临床能力:用户体验研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Nov 7;9:e48804. doi: 10.2196/48804.