• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗抑郁药和苯二氮䓬类药物治疗惊恐障碍的疗效及可接受性比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants and benzodiazepines for the treatment of panic disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Du Yang, Du Biao, Diao Yun, Yin Zubin, Li Jin, Shu Yunfeng, Zhang Zizhen, Chen Lizhi

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, The Affiliated Three Gorges Hospital of Chongqing University, Chongqing, 404000, China.

Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Three Gorges Hospital of Chongqing University, Chongqing, 404000, China.

出版信息

Asian J Psychiatr. 2021 Jun;60:102664. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102664. Epub 2021 May 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102664
PMID:33965693
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and acceptability of the different types of antidepressants and benzodiazepines for the treatment of panic disorder (PD) in adult patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1995 and 2020 on the use of antidepressants and benzodiazepines for the treatment of PD. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were performed.

RESULTS

42 RCTs were included in the network meta-analysis, with a comparison of 11 interventions.Escitalopram (odds ratios OR 1.52, 95 % credible interval CI 1.09-2.10), venlafaxine (OR 1.33, 95 % CI 1.16-1.51) and benzodiazepines (OR 1.50, 95 % CI 1.29-1.75) had greater efficacy and acceptability than the placebo. Imipramine(OR 1.43, 95 % CI 1.15-1.79) was also demonstrated to be efficacious and tolerated but the results were restricted to small sample size. Moreover, paroxetine, sertraline, fluoxetine, citalopram and clomipramine (OR 1.37, 1.36, 1.45, 1.33 and 1.36, respectively) were more efficacious, although the acceptability of paroxetine and sertraline were significantly less tolerated than benzodiazepines. Notably, the efficacy of reboxetine and fluvoxamine were merely as equal as that of the placebo.

OUTCOMES

This is the first systematic review of antidepressants and benzodiazepines for the treatment of PD to use a network analysis. Escitalopram and venlafaxine as well as benzodiazepines may be effective choices as treatments for PD with relatively good acceptability, which still needs to be confirmed byhigh-quality RCTs.

摘要

目的

本系统评价旨在评估不同类型的抗抑郁药和苯二氮䓬类药物治疗成年惊恐障碍(PD)患者的疗效和可接受性。

方法

检索了PubMed、科学网、EMBASE、MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆和ClinicalTrials.gov,查找1995年至2020年期间发表的关于使用抗抑郁药和苯二氮䓬类药物治疗PD的随机对照试验(RCT)。进行了系统评价和网状Meta分析。

结果

网状Meta分析纳入了42项RCT,比较了11种干预措施。艾司西酞普兰(优势比OR 1.52,95%可信区间CI 1.09 - 2.10)、文拉法辛(OR 1.33,95% CI 1.16 - 1.51)和苯二氮䓬类药物(OR 1.50,95% CI 1.29 - 1.75)比安慰剂具有更高的疗效和可接受性。丙咪嗪(OR 1.43,95% CI 1.15 - 1.79)也被证明有效且耐受性良好,但结果限于小样本量。此外,帕罗西汀、舍曲林、氟西汀、西酞普兰和氯米帕明(分别为OR 1.37、1.36、1.45、1.33和1.36)更有效,尽管帕罗西汀和舍曲林的可接受性明显低于苯二氮䓬类药物。值得注意的是,瑞波西汀和氟伏沙明的疗效仅与安慰剂相当。

结果

这是首次使用网状分析对治疗PD的抗抑郁药和苯二氮䓬类药物进行的系统评价。艾司西酞普兰、文拉法辛以及苯二氮䓬类药物可能是治疗PD的有效选择,且具有相对较好的可接受性,这仍需高质量RCT予以证实。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants and benzodiazepines for the treatment of panic disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药和苯二氮䓬类药物治疗惊恐障碍的疗效及可接受性比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Asian J Psychiatr. 2021 Jun;60:102664. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102664. Epub 2021 May 3.
2
Pharmacological treatments in panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人惊恐障碍的药物治疗:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):CD012729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012729.pub3.
3
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.21 种抗抑郁药治疗成人重度抑郁症的急性治疗的疗效和可接受性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1357-1366. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
4
New generation antidepressants for depression in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.新一代抗抑郁药治疗儿童和青少年抑郁症:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;5(5):CD013674. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013674.pub2.
5
Antidepressants versus placebo for panic disorder in adults.成人惊恐障碍患者使用抗抑郁药与安慰剂的对照研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 5;4(4):CD010676. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010676.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
7
Antidepressants for the treatment of people with co-occurring depression and alcohol dependence.用于治疗同时患有抑郁症和酒精依赖症患者的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 24;4(4):CD008581. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008581.pub2.
8
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人重性抑郁障碍维持期:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;28(1):402-409. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01824-z. Epub 2022 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Approaches to panic attack symptoms in cardiology outpatients.心脏病门诊患者惊恐发作症状的处理方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 21;15(1):17558. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93701-2.
2
Antidepressant Non-refill as a Proxy Measure for Medication Acceptability in Electronic Health Records.电子健康记录中抗抑郁药未再取药作为药物可接受性的替代指标
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025;45(4):310-319. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000002001. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
3
The Efficacy of Fluvoxamine in Anxiety Disorders and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
氟伏沙明治疗焦虑症和强迫症的疗效:系统评价与荟萃分析概述
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Feb 28;18(3):353. doi: 10.3390/ph18030353.
4
Psychotropic Medications Promote Time-Dependent Reduction of Suicidal Ideation in Mood Disorder: A Prospective Cohort Study.精神药物促进心境障碍患者自杀意念的时间依赖性降低:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Aug 12;39(31):e226. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e226.
5
Pharmacological treatments in panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人惊恐障碍的药物治疗:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):CD012729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012729.pub3.
6
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Assessment and Management of Anxiety and Panic Disorders in Emergency Setting.急诊环境中焦虑和惊恐障碍评估与管理的临床实践指南
Indian J Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;65(2):181-185. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_489_22. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
7
Panic disorder in general medical practice- A narrative review.综合医疗实践中的惊恐障碍——一篇叙述性综述。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Mar;11(3):861-869. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_888_21. Epub 2022 Mar 10.