• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种新的评分系统,预测 4-10mm 远端输尿管结石的药物排石治疗效果:药物排石治疗结石评分(METSS)。

Development of a new scoring system predicting medical expulsive therapy success on 4-10 mm distal ureteral stones: medical expulsive therapy stone score (METSS).

机构信息

Department of Urology, Ankara City Hospital, Üniversiteler Mahallesi, 1604. Cadde No: 9, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.

First Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Urolithiasis. 2023 Nov 28;52(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01504-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-023-01504-9
PMID:38015235
Abstract

Ureteral stone passage by using medical expulsive therapy (MET) are affected by numerous radiological and clinical parameters. We aimed to construct a scoring system, which would be based on clinical and computed tomography (CT)-derived data, to predict the success of the MET approach. 186 patients presenting to urology clinic or emergency department with unilateral single 4-10 mm distal ureteral stone and who had MET were included. All patients were divided into two groups as the MET-successful group and the MET-unsuccessful group. The success rate of MET was 67.2%. Stone size ≥ 6.5 mm, stone density > 1078 HU, ureteral wall thickness (UWT) > 2.31 mm, ureteral diameter (UD) > 9.24 mm, presence of periureteral stranding (PUS) and presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) were stated as the independent risk factors. Based on the regression coefficients on multivariate logistic regression analysis, 1 point for stone size > 6.5 mm, 2 points for stone density > 1078 HU, 2 points for UWT > 2.31 mm, 3 points for UD > 9.24 mm, 1 point for presence of PUS and 1 point for presence of DM were assigned to patients for each risk factor. Higher medical expulsive therapy stone score (METSS) indicated lower MET success. All patients were classified into three risk groups according to METSS: low risk (0-3 points; success percentage: 92.8%); intermediate risk (4-5 points; success percentage: 60.4%) and high risk (6-10 points; success percentage: 8.3%). The METSS seems to separate successfully the patients with a favorable or adverse constellation of factors.

摘要

采用药物排石疗法(MET)排石时,输尿管结石的排出受到许多放射学和临床参数的影响。我们旨在构建一个评分系统,该系统将基于临床和计算机断层扫描(CT)得出的数据,预测 MET 方法的成功。186 名因单侧单发 4-10mm 下段输尿管结石就诊于泌尿科门诊或急诊科且接受 MET 的患者被纳入研究。所有患者均分为 MET 成功组和 MET 失败组。MET 的成功率为 67.2%。结石大小≥6.5mm、结石密度>1078HU、输尿管壁厚度(UWT)>2.31mm、输尿管直径(UD)>9.24mm、存在输尿管周围条纹征(PUS)和存在糖尿病(DM)被认为是独立的危险因素。基于多元逻辑回归分析的回归系数,将结石大小>6.5mm 记为 1 分、结石密度>1078HU 记为 2 分、UWT>2.31mm 记为 2 分、UD>9.24mm 记为 3 分、存在 PUS 记为 1 分、存在 DM 记为 1 分,为每位患者的每个危险因素分配分数。METSS 越高,MET 成功率越低。根据 METSS,所有患者被分为三个风险组:低危组(0-3 分;成功率:92.8%)、中危组(4-5 分;成功率:60.4%)和高危组(6-10 分;成功率:8.3%)。METSS 似乎成功地将具有有利或不利因素组合的患者区分开来。

相似文献

1
Development of a new scoring system predicting medical expulsive therapy success on 4-10 mm distal ureteral stones: medical expulsive therapy stone score (METSS).开发一种新的评分系统,预测 4-10mm 远端输尿管结石的药物排石治疗效果:药物排石治疗结石评分(METSS)。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Nov 28;52(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01504-9.
2
Can CT-Based Stone Impaction Markers Augment the Predictive Ability of Spontaneous Stone Passage?基于CT的结石嵌顿标志物能否增强结石自然排出的预测能力?
J Endourol. 2021 Apr;35(4):429-435. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0645. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
3
Computed tomography findings predicting the success of silodosin for medical expulsive therapy of ureteral stones.计算机断层扫描结果预测西洛多辛用于输尿管结石药物排石治疗的成功率。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2017 Jun;33(6):290-294. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 May 3.
4
Impaction and Prediction: Does Ureteral Wall Thickness Affect the Success of Medical Expulsive Therapy in Pediatric Ureteral Stones?梗阻与预测:输尿管壁厚度会影响小儿输尿管结石药物排石治疗的成功率吗?
Urol Int. 2017;98(4):436-441. doi: 10.1159/000453668. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
5
CT-Based Predictors of Spontaneous Ureteral Stone Passage.基于 CT 的输尿管结石自然排出的预测因素。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2024 Aug;34(8):879-884. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2024.08.879.
6
Predictive parameters for medical expulsive therapy in ureteral stones: a critical evaluation.输尿管结石药物排石治疗的预测参数:一项批判性评估
Urolithiasis. 2015 Jun;43(3):271-5. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0762-8. Epub 2015 Mar 29.
7
Longitudinal stone diameter on coronal reconstruction of computed tomography as a predictor of ureteral stone expulsion in medical expulsive therapy.冠状位重建 CT 上的结石长径作为药物排石治疗中输尿管结石排出的预测指标。
Urology. 2012 Oct;80(4):784-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.06.032. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
8
CT-related parameters and Framingham score as predictors of spontaneous passage of ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm: results from a prospective, observational, multicenter study.CT 相关参数和弗雷明汉评分预测 ≤ 10 毫米输尿管结石的自发排出:一项前瞻性、观察性、多中心研究的结果。
Urolithiasis. 2021 Jun;49(3):227-237. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01214-6. Epub 2020 Sep 27.
9
A novel model using computed tomography parameters to predict shock wave lithotripsy success in ureteral stones at different locations.一种利用计算机断层扫描参数预测不同部位输尿管结石碎石术成功的新模型。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Mar;46(2):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.01.011. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
10
Can ureteral wall thickness (UWT) be used as a potential parameter for decision-making in uncomplicated distal ureteral stones 5-10 mm in size? A prospective study.输尿管壁厚度(UWT)能否作为大小为 5-10mm 的无复杂症状的输尿管下段结石治疗决策的潜在参数?一项前瞻性研究。
World J Urol. 2021 Sep;39(9):3555-3561. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03608-6. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Transforming urinary stone disease management by artificial intelligence-based methods: A comprehensive review.基于人工智能的方法对尿石症治疗的变革:一项全面综述
Asian J Urol. 2023 Jul;10(3):258-274. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 May 2.
2
Ureteral Obstruction Promotes Ureteral Inflammation and Fibrosis.输尿管梗阻会促进输尿管炎症和纤维化。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Mar;9(2):371-380. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.09.014. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
3
Nomogram predicting the probability of spontaneous stone passage in patients presenting with acute ureteric colic.
预测急性输尿管绞痛患者结石自然排出概率的列线图。
BJU Int. 2022 Jun 28;130(6):823-31. doi: 10.1111/bju.15839.
4
Global Trends in Incidence and Burden of Urolithiasis from 1990 to 2019: An Analysis of Global Burden of Disease Study Data.1990年至2019年全球尿石症发病率和负担趋势:全球疾病负担研究数据分析
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Jan 3;35:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.10.008. eCollection 2022 Jan.
5
Comparison of efficacy of three commonly used alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureter stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.三种常用α受体阻滞剂作为医学排石疗法治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Sep-Oct;48(5):742-759. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0548.
6
Current and emerging pharmacological targets for medical expulsive therapy.药物排石治疗的当前及新出现的药理学靶点
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2022 Jan;130 Suppl 1:16-22. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13613. Epub 2021 May 26.
7
Spontaneous ureteral stone passage: a novel and comprehensive nomogram.自发性输尿管结石排出:一种新颖而全面的列线图。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022 Feb;74(1):102-109. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.20.04125-9. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
8
Osteochondroma of the pubic symphysis causing hematuria: a case report and literature review.耻骨联合骨软骨瘤导致血尿:病例报告及文献复习。
BMC Urol. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00770-8.
9
CT-related parameters and Framingham score as predictors of spontaneous passage of ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm: results from a prospective, observational, multicenter study.CT 相关参数和弗雷明汉评分预测 ≤ 10 毫米输尿管结石的自发排出:一项前瞻性、观察性、多中心研究的结果。
Urolithiasis. 2021 Jun;49(3):227-237. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01214-6. Epub 2020 Sep 27.
10
Can CT-Based Stone Impaction Markers Augment the Predictive Ability of Spontaneous Stone Passage?基于CT的结石嵌顿标志物能否增强结石自然排出的预测能力?
J Endourol. 2021 Apr;35(4):429-435. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0645. Epub 2020 Oct 27.