Rigaud Solange, d'Errico Francesco, Vanhaeren Marian
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unité Mixte Internationale 3199 (UMI3199), Centre for International Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences (CIRHUS), New York University, New York, New York, United States of America; Service de Préhistoire de l'Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unité Mixte de Recherche 5199 (UMR5199), de la Préhistoire à l'Actuel: Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie (PACEA), Université de Bordeaux, Talence, France; Institute for Archaeology, History, Cultural Studies and Religion, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 8;10(4):e0121166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121166. eCollection 2015.
The transition to farming is the process by which human groups switched from hunting and gathering wild resources to food production. Understanding how and to what extent the spreading of farming communities from the Near East had an impact on indigenous foraging populations in Europe has been the subject of lively debates for decades. Ethnographic and archaeological studies have shown that population replacement and admixture, trade, and long distance diffusion of cultural traits lead to detectable changes in symbolic codes expressed by associations of ornaments on the human body. Here we use personal ornaments to document changes in cultural geography during the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition. We submitted a binary matrix of 224 bead-types found at 212 European Mesolithic and 222 Early Neolithic stratigraphic units to a series of spatial and multivariate analyses. Our results reveal consistent diachronic and geographical trends in the use of personal ornaments during the Neolithisation. Adoption of novel bead-types combined with selective appropriation of old attires by incoming farmers is identified in Southern and Central Europe while cultural resistance leading to the nearly exclusive persistence of indigenous personal ornaments characterizes Northern Europe. We argue that this pattern reflects two distinct cultural trajectories with different potential for gene flow.
向农业的转变是人类群体从狩猎和采集野生资源转向粮食生产的过程。几十年来,了解近东地区农业社区的扩张如何以及在多大程度上对欧洲本土觅食人口产生影响一直是激烈辩论的主题。人种志和考古学研究表明,人口替代与混合、贸易以及文化特征的远距离传播会导致人体上装饰品组合所表达的象征符号发生可检测到的变化。在这里,我们使用个人装饰品来记录中石器时代至新石器时代过渡期间文化地理的变化。我们将在212个欧洲中石器时代和222个新石器时代早期地层单位中发现的224种珠子类型的二元矩阵进行了一系列空间和多变量分析。我们的结果揭示了新石器时代化过程中个人装饰品使用上一致的历时性和地理趋势。在南欧和中欧,新珠子类型的采用与新来农民对旧服饰的选择性挪用相结合,而北欧则以文化抵制为特征,导致本土个人装饰品几乎完全留存下来。我们认为这种模式反映了两种具有不同基因流动潜力的不同文化轨迹。