• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较闭合式与开放式侧方内括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Comparing closed versus open lateral internal sphincterotomy for management of chronic anal fissure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials.

作者信息

Asefa Zelalem, Awedew Atalel Fentahun

机构信息

Department of Surgery, SoM, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 28;13(1):20957. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48286-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-48286-z
PMID:38017243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10684486/
Abstract

Chronic anal fissure is one of the most common benign anorectal health conditions, causing significant morbidity, quality of life, and economic loss. Eight randomized controlled trials with a total population size of 1035 were eligible for analysis. Seven studies included both males and female, while one only included females. The majority of randomized controlled trials involved female dominance [54.9% (43.5-66.3)] and posterior midline location [86.1% (95% CI 81.5-90.8%)]. This meta-analysis of randomised control trials found that overall postoperative healing was 90.2%, recurrent anal fissure was 3.7%, and postoperative incontinence was 8.9% after LIS. Even though there was no statistically significant difference, closed lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) had higher rates of recurrent anal fissure (RR = 1.73 (95% CI 0.86-3.47, p = 0.90, I2 = 0%) and lower rates of postoperative incontinence rate (RR = 0.60 (95% CI 0.37-0.96, p = 0.76, I2-0) as compared with open LIS. We recommended that closed lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) is a safe and effective surgical treatment option for chronic anal fissures.

摘要

慢性肛裂是最常见的良性肛肠健康问题之一,会导致严重的发病率、生活质量下降和经济损失。共有1035名受试者的8项随机对照试验符合分析条件。7项研究纳入了男性和女性,而1项仅纳入了女性。大多数随机对照试验中女性占主导[54.9%(43.5 - 66.3)],且肛裂多位于后正中线[86.1%(95%CI 81.5 - 90.8%)]。这项随机对照试验的荟萃分析发现,在接受侧方内括约肌切开术(LIS)后,总体术后愈合率为90.2%,肛裂复发率为3.7%,术后大便失禁率为8.9%。尽管无统计学显著差异,但与开放性LIS相比,闭合性侧方内括约肌切开术的肛裂复发率较高(RR = 1.73(95%CI 0.86 - 3.47,p = 0.90,I2 = 0%)),术后大便失禁率较低(RR = 0.60(95%CI 0.37 - 0.96,p = 0.76,I2 = 0))。我们建议,闭合性侧方内括约肌切开术(LIS)是治疗慢性肛裂的一种安全有效的手术选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1d/10684486/7435c5be1f80/41598_2023_48286_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1d/10684486/5b0d80cc33cd/41598_2023_48286_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1d/10684486/e25873dc1af8/41598_2023_48286_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1d/10684486/a7885ceff80e/41598_2023_48286_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1d/10684486/af0598ea340a/41598_2023_48286_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1d/10684486/354f53c87bcf/41598_2023_48286_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1d/10684486/7435c5be1f80/41598_2023_48286_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1d/10684486/5b0d80cc33cd/41598_2023_48286_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1d/10684486/e25873dc1af8/41598_2023_48286_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1d/10684486/a7885ceff80e/41598_2023_48286_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1d/10684486/af0598ea340a/41598_2023_48286_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1d/10684486/354f53c87bcf/41598_2023_48286_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca1d/10684486/7435c5be1f80/41598_2023_48286_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing closed versus open lateral internal sphincterotomy for management of chronic anal fissure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials.比较闭合式与开放式侧方内括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 28;13(1):20957. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48286-z.
2
Anal advancement flap versus lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure- a systematic review and meta-analysis.分析推进皮瓣与侧方内括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂的疗效比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jan;49:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
3
Letter to the editor on "Open versus closed lateral internal anal sphincterotomy in the management of chronic anal fissures: A prospective randomised study". Our results in the patients who undergone to secondary healing following the fissure tract excision for primary chronic anal fissure.
Asian J Surg. 2017 Nov;40(6):495-497. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
4
Operative procedures for fissure in ano.肛瘘手术操作
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD002199. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002199.pub4.
5
Posterolateral versus lateral internal anal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a randomized controlled trial.后外侧与外侧内括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂:一项随机对照试验
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Oct;33(10):1461-1467. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3087-6. Epub 2018 May 19.
6
Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure: randomized prospective controlled trial.肉毒杆菌毒素注射与外侧内括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂:随机前瞻性对照试验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Oct;397(7):1093-8. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0948-2. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
7
Modified open posterior internal sphincterotomy with sliding skin graft for chronic anal fissure and anal stenosis: Low recurrence rate and no serious faecal incontinence postoperative complication.改良开放式后位内括约肌切开术联合滑行皮瓣移植治疗慢性肛裂及肛门狭窄:复发率低,术后无严重大便失禁并发症。
J Visc Surg. 2022 Aug;159(4):267-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2021.07.002. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatment of anal fissure.一种肛门裂治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Aug;21(8):605-625. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1664-2. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
9
Clinical Outcome of 0.2% Glyceryl Trinitrate Topical Ointment Compared to Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy in the Treatment of Patient with Chronic Anal Fissure: A Randomized Control Trial.硝酸甘油 0.2%软膏外用与侧方内括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂患者的临床疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Mymensingh Med J. 2022 Oct;31(4):1034-1039.
10
Operative procedures for fissure in ano.肛管裂的手术方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20(1):CD002199. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002199.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
High-Intensity Laser Therapy - An Option for Managing the Pain in Anal Fissures.高强度激光疗法——一种治疗肛裂疼痛的选择。
J Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Oct 23;15:e52. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2024.52. eCollection 2024.
2
Temporal trends and treatment patterns in anal fissure management: insights from a multicenter study in Italy.分析性肛裂治疗的时间趋势和治疗模式:意大利多中心研究的结果
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Oct 4;28(1):139. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03011-4.
3
Comparative Analysis of Open and Closed Sphincterotomy for the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: Safety and Efficacy Evaluation.

本文引用的文献

1
The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-proctology (SIUCP: Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of anal fissure.意大利统一肛肠外科学会(SIUCP:Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia)关于肛裂管理的指南。
BMC Surg. 2023 Oct 13;23(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02223-z.
2
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Anal Fissures.美国结肠和直肠外科医师协会肛裂管理临床实践指南。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Feb 1;66(2):190-199. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002664. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
3
A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing treatments for anal fissure.
比较分析肛门括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂的疗效和安全性
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Apr 29;30:e944127. doi: 10.12659/MSM.944127.
系统评价和网络荟萃分析比较肛裂治疗方法。
Surgery. 2022 Jul;172(1):41-52. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.11.030. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
4
Anal Fissure - an extensive update.肛门裂 - 全面更新。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2021 Mar 12;93(4):46-56. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.7879.
5
Diagnosis and Treatment of Anal Fissures in 2021.2021年肛裂的诊断与治疗
JAMA. 2021 Feb 16;325(7):688-689. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.16705.
6
Comparative efficacy of medical treatment versus surgical sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure.药物治疗与手术括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂的疗效比较
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;23(4):539-544. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_383_19.
7
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
8
Treatment of chronic anal fissure: Is open lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) a safe and adequate option?慢性肛裂的治疗:开放式外侧内括约肌切开术(LIS)是否安全有效?
Asian J Surg. 2019 May;42(5):628-633. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
9
Bilateral versus unilateral botulinum toxin injections for chronic anal fissure: a randomised trial.双侧与单侧肉毒毒素注射治疗慢性肛裂的随机对照研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Jul;22(7):545-551. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1821-2. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
10
Botulinum toxin injection vs topical nitrates for chronic anal fissure: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.肉毒杆菌毒素注射与局部硝酸盐治疗慢性肛裂的比较:一项更新的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jan;20(1):6-15. doi: 10.1111/codi.13969.