• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Literacy and Facilitators Related to a Free Screening Program in Thailand.结直肠癌(CRC)筛查素养及泰国免费筛查项目相关促进因素。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Nov 1;24(11):3883-3889. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.11.3883.
2
Questionnaire Validation of Colorectal Cancer Literacy Scale among Thai People in Northeastern Thailand.泰国东北部人群结直肠癌知识量表的问卷效度验证
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Feb 26;20(2):645-651. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.2.645.
3
Association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening behaviors in adults in Northwestern Turkey.土耳其西北部成年人健康素养与结直肠癌筛查行为的关系。
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Apr 24;31(2):361-366. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa227.
4
Health Literacy and Demand for Medical Cannabis use among Colorectal Cancer Patients in Northern Thailand: A Cross-Sectional Study.泰国北部结直肠癌患者的健康素养与医用大麻使用需求:一项横断面研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Mar 1;25(3):999-1005. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.3.999.
5
Are anxiety levels associated with the decision to participate in a Swedish colorectal cancer screening programme? A nationwide cross-sectional study.焦虑水平是否与参与瑞典结直肠癌筛查计划的决定有关?一项全国性的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e025109. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025109.
6
A Cross-Sectional Assessment of Literacy and Awareness, Attitudes, and Beliefs About Colorectal Cancer and Its Screening in Riyadh Region.利雅得地区关于结直肠癌及其筛查的读写能力、认知、态度和信念的横断面评估
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Jun;33(3):660-667. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1129-8.
7
Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic.目标人群对捷克共和国结直肠癌筛查障碍和促进因素的观点。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar 7;25(9):1132-1141. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1132.
8
Barriers and facilitators for colorectal cancer screening in a low-income urban community in Mexico City.墨西哥城低收入城市社区中结直肠癌筛查的障碍与促进因素
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Jul 10;1:64. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00055-z. eCollection 2020.
9
Association of eHealth literacy with colorectal cancer knowledge and screening practice among internet users in Japan.日本互联网用户的电子健康素养与结直肠癌知识及筛查实践的关联
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 13;14(6):e153. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1927.
10
Patient activation increases colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized trial among low-income minority patients.患者激活可提高结直肠癌筛查率:一项针对低收入少数族裔患者的随机试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jan;21(1):45-52. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0815. Epub 2011 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceived Importance of the Benefits and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Best-Worst Scaling Study.结直肠癌筛查的获益和危害感知重要性:最佳最差量表研究。
Value Health. 2023 Jun;26(6):918-924. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.12.015. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
2
Facilitators and barriers to colorectal cancer screening using the immunochemical faecal occult blood test among an average-risk population in semi-rural Malaysia: A qualitative study.在马来西亚半农村地区的普通风险人群中使用免疫化学粪便潜血试验进行结直肠癌筛查的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 29;17(12):e0279489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279489. eCollection 2022.
3
Barriers and facilitators to colonoscopy for cancer detection: patient and practitioner perspectives.用于癌症检测的结肠镜检查的障碍和促进因素:患者和医生的观点。
Psychol Health. 2024 Sep;39(9):1263-1283. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2141241. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
4
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death.结肠镜筛查对结直肠癌发病风险和相关死亡的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 27;387(17):1547-1556. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2208375. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
5
Coronavirus-Related Health Literacy: A Cross-Sectional Study during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.新冠病毒相关健康素养:意大利 COVID-19 大流行期间的一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;19(7):3807. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073807.
6
Risk Factors for the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌诊断的危险因素。
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748211056692. doi: 10.1177/10732748211056692.
7
Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in Asia.亚洲结直肠癌筛查的障碍与促进因素
Ecancermedicalscience. 2021 Sep 13;15:1285. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1285. eCollection 2021.
8
Healthcare provider cultural competency and receptivity to colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.医疗服务提供者的文化能力和对非裔美国人结直肠癌筛查的接受程度。
Psychol Health Med. 2022 Dec;27(10):2073-2084. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2021.1939073. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
9
Factors Associated with Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice towards Colorectal Cancer and Its Screening among People Aged 50-75 Years.50至75岁人群对结直肠癌及其筛查的知识、态度和行为的相关因素
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 13;18(8):4100. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084100.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in a low incidence country: The case of Saudi Arabia.在低发国家进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益分析:以沙特阿拉伯为例。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul-Aug;27(4):208-216. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_526_20.

结直肠癌(CRC)筛查素养及泰国免费筛查项目相关促进因素。

Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Literacy and Facilitators Related to a Free Screening Program in Thailand.

机构信息

Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Nov 1;24(11):3883-3889. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.11.3883.

DOI:10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.11.3883
PMID:38019247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10772750/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate CRC screening literacy and to determine the association between demographic characteristics and levels of CRC screening literacy and facilitators motivating participation.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was carried out with 1,272 Thai citizens aged 50-70 years consenting to complete the screening protocol. Data were collected at the final visit by a self-reported questionnaire which was developed and validated using I-CVI=1. Difficulty of CRC screening knowledge dimension was tested by KR20, Cronbach's alpha 0.49.

RESULTS

The majority of participants, 834 (65.6%) had sufficient CRC screening literacy and association between characteristics and levels of CRC screening literacy was not different. Comparing between characteristics and facilitators showed significant differences in trusting healthcare providers, perceiving harmless procedures, having constipation and time available. By married and own income participants exhibited lower trust in healthcare providers, 68% (OR 0.32, 95%CI 0.14 - 0.73) and 59% (OR 0.41, 95%CI 0.19 - 0.95), respectively. Married individuals perceived the procedures of screening involved higher harm, 32% (OR 0.68, 95%CI 0.45 - 0.99). Female and age over 60 with constipation constituted higher screening, 1.9 fold (OR 1.93, 95%CI 1.44 - 2.60) and 1.4 fold (OR 1.44, 95%CI 1.09 - 1.90). Though time available, age over 60 was lower screening 56% (OR 0.44, 95%CI 0.24 - 0.80), while own income and income more than 30,000 THB/month participants constituted higher screening 15 fold (OR 15.14, 95%CI 4.72 - 48.56) and 2.5 fold (OR 2.50, 95%CI 1.50 - 4.18), respectively.

CONCLUSION

CRC screening literacy of participants was high. The association between characteristics and CRC screening literacy levels did not differ while characteristics and facilitators differed in some aspects. The free program promoted CRC screening equity; however, multilevel facilitators must be concerned, prioritized and intervened to motivate participation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估 CRC 筛查素养,并确定人口统计学特征与 CRC 筛查素养水平之间的关联,以及促使参与的因素。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,共纳入 1272 名同意完成筛查方案的 50-70 岁泰国公民。数据通过自报问卷收集,该问卷使用 I-CVI=1 进行了开发和验证。CRC 筛查知识维度的难度通过 KR20 进行了测试,Cronbach's alpha 为 0.49。

结果

大多数参与者(834 名,65.6%)具有足够的 CRC 筛查素养,且特征与 CRC 筛查素养水平之间的关联没有差异。在特征与促进因素的比较中,在信任医疗保健提供者、认为程序无害、有便秘和有时间等方面存在显著差异。已婚和有收入的参与者对医疗保健提供者的信任度较低,分别为 68%(OR 0.32,95%CI 0.14 - 0.73)和 59%(OR 0.41,95%CI 0.19 - 0.95)。已婚者认为筛查程序危害更大,为 32%(OR 0.68,95%CI 0.45 - 0.99)。女性和 60 岁以上且有便秘的人群筛查率更高,分别为 1.9 倍(OR 1.93,95%CI 1.44 - 2.60)和 1.4 倍(OR 1.44,95%CI 1.09 - 1.90)。尽管有时间,但年龄超过 60 岁的人群筛查率较低,为 56%(OR 0.44,95%CI 0.24 - 0.80),而收入超过 30000 泰铢/月和有收入的参与者的筛查率更高,分别为 15 倍(OR 15.14,95%CI 4.72 - 48.56)和 2.5 倍(OR 2.50,95%CI 1.50 - 4.18)。

结论

参与者的 CRC 筛查素养较高。特征与 CRC 筛查素养水平之间的关联没有差异,而特征和促进因素在某些方面存在差异。免费计划促进了 CRC 筛查的公平性;然而,必须关注、优先考虑和干预多层次的促进因素,以激发参与。