• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者激活可提高结直肠癌筛查率:一项针对低收入少数族裔患者的随机试验。

Patient activation increases colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized trial among low-income minority patients.

机构信息

College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Suite 525, 1590 North High Street, Columbus, Ohio 43201, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jan;21(1):45-52. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0815. Epub 2011 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0815
PMID:22068288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3650905/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates remain low among low-income and minority populations. The purpose of this study was to determine whether providing patients with screening information, activating them to ask for a screening test, and telephone barriers counseling improves CRC screening rates compared with providing screening information only.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to CRC screening information plus patient activation and barriers counseling (n = 138) or CRC screening information (n = 132). Barriers counseling was attempted among activated patients if screening was not completed after one month. CRC screening test completion was determined by medical record review at two months after the medical visit. Logistic regression was used to determine whether activated patients were more likely to complete CRC screening, after adjustment for confounding factors (e.g., demographic characteristics and CRC knowledge).

RESULTS

Patients were African American (72.2%), female (63.7%), had annual household incomes less than $20,000 (60.7%), no health insurance (57.0%), and limited health literacy skills (53.7%). In adjusted analyses, more patients randomized to the activation group completed a screening test (19.6% vs. 9.9%; OR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.14-5.56; P = 0.020). In addition, more activated patients reported discussing screening with their provider (54.4% vs. 27.5%, OR = 3.29, 95% CI: 1.95-5.56; P < 0.001) and had more screening tests ordered (39.1% vs. 17.6%; OR = 3.40, 95% CI: 1.88-6.15; P < 0.001) compared with those in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Patient activation increased CRC screening rates among low-income minority patients.

IMPACT

Innovative strategies are still needed to increase CRC screening discussions, motivate providers to recommend screening to patients, as well as assist patients to complete ordered screening tests.

摘要

背景

在低收入和少数族裔人群中,结直肠癌(CRC)筛查率仍然较低。本研究的目的是确定提供筛查信息、促使患者主动要求进行筛查检测,以及进行电话障碍咨询是否比仅提供筛查信息更能提高 CRC 筛查率。

方法

将患者随机分为 CRC 筛查信息加患者激活和障碍咨询组(n = 138)或 CRC 筛查信息组(n = 132)。如果一个月后未完成筛查,则对激活患者进行障碍咨询。在就诊后两个月通过病历回顾确定 CRC 筛查检测完成情况。采用逻辑回归,在校正混杂因素(如人口统计学特征和 CRC 知识)后,确定激活患者是否更有可能完成 CRC 筛查。

结果

患者为非裔美国人(72.2%)、女性(63.7%)、年收入低于 20,000 美元(60.7%)、没有医疗保险(57.0%)和有限的健康素养技能(53.7%)。在调整后的分析中,更多随机分配到激活组的患者完成了筛查检测(19.6%比 9.9%;OR = 2.35,95%CI:1.14-5.56;P = 0.020)。此外,更多的激活患者报告与他们的提供者讨论了筛查(54.4%比 27.5%,OR = 3.29,95%CI:1.95-5.56;P < 0.001),并要求进行更多的筛查检测(39.1%比 17.6%;OR = 3.40,95%CI:1.88-6.15;P < 0.001)与对照组相比。

结论

患者激活增加了低收入少数族裔患者的 CRC 筛查率。

影响

仍然需要创新策略来增加 CRC 筛查讨论,促使提供者向患者推荐筛查,并帮助患者完成已开的筛查检测。

相似文献

1
Patient activation increases colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized trial among low-income minority patients.患者激活可提高结直肠癌筛查率:一项针对低收入少数族裔患者的随机试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jan;21(1):45-52. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0815. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
2
The Effectiveness of a Physician-Only and Physician-Patient Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussions Between Providers and African American and Latino Patients.仅医生参与及医生-患者共同参与的干预措施对医疗服务提供者与非裔美国人和拉丁裔患者之间结直肠癌筛查讨论的有效性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Dec;30(12):1780-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3381-8. Epub 2015 May 19.
3
Patient Navigation Plus Tailored Digital Video Disc Increases Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Low-Income and Minority Patients Who Did Not Attend a Scheduled Screening Colonoscopy: A Randomized Trial.患者导航加定制数字视频光盘增加了低收入和少数族裔患者的结直肠癌筛查率,这些患者没有参加计划的筛查结肠镜检查:一项随机试验。
Ann Behav Med. 2024 Apr 11;58(5):314-327. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaae013.
4
Patient-provider discussions about colorectal cancer screening: who initiates elements of informed decision making?医患关于结直肠癌筛查的讨论:谁主动开展知情决策的要素?
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Sep;27(9):1135-41. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2045-1. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
5
Assessing Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers by Two Methods.通过两种方法评估结直肠癌筛查障碍。
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Jun;33(3):536-543. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1148-5.
6
Randomized controlled dissemination study of community-to-clinic navigation to promote CRC screening: Study design and implications.社区到诊所引导促进结直肠癌筛查的随机对照传播研究:研究设计与启示
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Feb;53:106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
7
Colorectal cancer screening among African American church members: a qualitative and quantitative study of patient-provider communication.非裔美国教会成员的结直肠癌筛查:患者与医护人员沟通的定性和定量研究
BMC Public Health. 2004 Dec 15;4:62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-62.
8
Implementation intentions and colorectal screening: a randomized trial in safety-net clinics.实施意图与结直肠癌筛查:在安全网诊所进行的一项随机试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Dec;47(6):703-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
9
A culturally tailored navigator program for colorectal cancer screening in a community health center: a randomized, controlled trial.社区卫生中心针对结直肠癌筛查的文化定制导航计划:一项随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Feb;24(2):211-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0864-x.
10
Computer-tailored intervention increases colorectal cancer screening among low-income African Americans in primary care: Results of a randomized trial.计算机定制干预措施提高了初级保健中低收入非裔美国人的结直肠癌筛查率:一项随机试验的结果。
Prev Med. 2021 Apr;145:106449. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106449. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Activation and Shared Decision-Making Among Hispanics/Latinos With Metastatic Cancer: A Qualitative Study.西班牙裔/拉丁裔转移性癌症患者的患者激活与共同决策:一项定性研究。
Psychooncology. 2025 Apr;34(4):e70145. doi: 10.1002/pon.70145.
2
Mi-CARE: Comparing Three Evidence-Based Interventions to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening among Ethnic Minorities within Three Different Clinical Contexts.美加爱护航:在三种不同临床环境下,比较三种循证干预措施在少数民族群体中促进结直肠癌筛查的效果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 10;20(22):7049. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20227049.
3
An Exploratory Analysis of the Role of Religion in Colorectal Cancer Screening among Safety-Net Clinic Patients.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized trial comparing the effect of two phone-based interventions on colorectal cancer screening adherence.一项比较两种基于电话的干预措施对结直肠癌筛查依从性影响的随机试验。
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Dec;42(3):294-303. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9291-z.
2
Productivity savings from colorectal cancer prevention and control strategies.结直肠癌预防和控制策略的生产力节约。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Aug;41(2):e5-e14. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.04.008.
3
State disparities in colorectal cancer mortality patterns in the United States.美国结直肠癌死亡率模式的州际差异。
安全网诊所患者中宗教在结直肠癌筛查中的作用的探索性分析。
J Geriatr Med Gerontol. 2019;5(1). doi: 10.23937/2469-5858/1510058.
4
Assessment of online patient education material for eye cancers: A cross-sectional study.眼癌在线患者教育材料评估:一项横断面研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Oct 16;3(10):e0001967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001967. eCollection 2023.
5
Assessing the Functional Accessibility, Actionability, and Quality of Patient Education Materials from Canadian Cancer Agencies.评估加拿大癌症机构患者教育材料的功能可及性、可操作性和质量。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Jan 19;30(2):1439-1449. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30020110.
6
Improving Uptake of Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment in a Remote Tailored Risk Communication and Navigation Intervention: Large Effect Size but Room to Grow.提高偏远地区癌症遗传风险评估的接受度:定制风险沟通和导航干预的大效应量,但仍有增长空间。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 May 20;41(15):2767-2778. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00751. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
7
Protocol for a pilot and feasibility study evaluating a complex nurse-led patient education intervention to promote cancer patient engagement in healthy lifestyle (O-PHE programme).评价以护士为主导的复杂患者教育干预措施以促进癌症患者参与健康生活方式(O-PHE 计划)的试点和可行性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 23;12(12):e066163. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066163.
8
Patient Engagement in Oncology Practice: A Qualitative Study on Patients' and Nurses' Perspectives.肿瘤学实践中的患者参与:基于患者和护士视角的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;19(18):11644. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811644.
9
Healthcare Disparities and Colorectal Cancer.医疗保健差异与结直肠癌。
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2022 Apr;31(2):157-169. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2021.11.002. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
10
Preparing Patients with Early Stage Prostate Cancer to Participate in Clinical Appointments Using a Shared Decision Making Training Video.使用共享决策制定培训视频准备早期前列腺癌患者参加临床预约。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Apr;42(3):364-374. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211028563. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Jul;20(7):1296-302. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0250.
4
Vital signs: Colorectal cancer screening, incidence, and mortality--United States, 2002-2010.生命体征:2002-2010 年美国结直肠癌筛查、发病和死亡情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Jul 8;60(26):884-9.
5
Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States.美国脆弱人群中结直肠癌检测使用的趋势。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Aug;20(8):1611-21. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0220. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
6
Colorectal cancer screening among ethnically diverse, low-income patients: a randomized controlled trial.不同种族低收入患者的结直肠癌筛查:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 May 23;171(10):906-12. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.201.
7
Effectiveness of a web-based colorectal cancer screening patient decision aid: a randomized controlled trial in a mixed-literacy population.基于网络的结直肠癌筛查患者决策辅助工具的有效性:在混合读写人群中进行的一项随机对照试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jun;40(6):608-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.019.
8
A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same.一项针对促进结直肠癌筛查的定制化交互式计算机推送干预的随机对照试验:有时更多只是一样。
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Jun;41(3):284-99. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9258-5.
9
Physicians' colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns.医生的结直肠癌筛查讨论和推荐模式。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Mar;20(3):509-21. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0749. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
10
Electronic patient messages to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.通过电子患者信息促进结直肠癌筛查:一项随机对照试验
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Apr 11;171(7):636-41. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.467. Epub 2010 Dec 13.