Health Care Manage Rev. 2024;49(1):35-45. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000389. Epub 2023 Nov 19.
When frontline employees' voice is not heard and their ideas are not implemented, patient care is negatively impacted, and frontline employees are more likely to experience burnout and less likely to engage in subsequent change efforts.
Theory about what happens to voiced ideas during the critical stage after employees voice and before performance outcomes are measured is nascent. We draw on research from organizational behavior, human resource management, and health care management to develop a multilevel model encompassing practices and processes at the individual, team, managerial, and organizational levels that, together, provide a nuanced picture of how voiced ideas reach implementation.
INSIGHT/ADVANCE: We offer a multilevel understanding of the practices and processes through which voice leads to implementation; illuminate the importance of thinking temporally about voice to better understand the complex dynamics required for voiced ideas to reach implementation; and highlight factors that help ideas reach implementation, including voicers' personal and interpersonal tactics with colleagues and managers, as well as senior leaders modeling and explaining norms and making voice-related processes and practices transparent.
Our model provides evidence-based strategies for bolstering rejected or ignored ideas, including how voicers (re)articulate ideas, whom they enlist to advance ideas, how they engage peers and managers to improve conditions for intentional experimentation, and how they take advantage of listening structures and other formal mechanisms for voice. Our model also highlights how senior leaders can make change processes and priorities explicit and transparent.
如果一线员工的意见没有被听到,他们的想法没有得到实施,那么患者的护理质量就会受到负面影响,一线员工更有可能感到精疲力竭,也不太可能参与后续的变革努力。
关于员工提出意见后、绩效结果衡量前,意见在关键阶段会发生什么的理论还处于起步阶段。我们借鉴了组织行为学、人力资源管理和医疗保健管理方面的研究,制定了一个包含个人、团队、管理层和组织层面的实践和流程的多层次模型,该模型提供了一个细致入微的视角,说明了意见是如何落实的。
洞察/进展:我们提供了一个多层次的理解,即意见如何导致实施;阐明了从时间角度思考意见的重要性,以更好地理解实现意见所需的复杂动态;并强调了有助于意见实施的因素,包括意见提出者与同事和经理的个人和人际策略,以及高级领导的榜样作用、解释规范以及使与意见相关的流程和实践透明化。
我们的模型提供了支持被拒绝或被忽视的意见的循证策略,包括意见提出者如何重新表达意见、他们争取谁来推进意见、他们如何与同行和经理合作以改善有计划实验的条件,以及他们如何利用倾听结构和其他正式的意见渠道。我们的模型还强调了高级领导者如何使变革流程和优先事项明确和透明化。